Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy
News announcements and other topics => News => Topic started by: gravityblock on November 19, 2010, 07:34:22 PM
-
Review: Anti-Gravity / Cold Fusion Explained In Detail: A New Era in Physics - PESWiki, http://www.peswiki.com/index.php/Review:_Anti-Gravity_/_Cold_Fusion_Explained_In_Detail:_A_New_Era_in_Physics
All papers including newest, plus a lecture given by Frank, a talk show interview, and a rip of his website, peer reviewed papers on cold fusion and Podkletnov's work, and other gravitomagnetism experiments, http://frankz.cwahi.net/
GB
-
An electron is an intergration of electromagnetic waves. We can define the electron as deformed magnetic space, propagated in wave form. Now an electron, as a wave form, is moved in an (anti)clockwise circle. In this spiraloid movement it has a discontinuous wave surface rather like a spiral spring. The movement itself is not discontinuous, but only appears so by virtue of its spiralling movement. It also shows a magnetic phenomenon cancelling out the charge on one side which gives an observer the impression that the energy moves in jumps. Further, it is subject to the outcome of the difference of charge due to this magnetic effect, as well as the result of its rotation.
The so-called orbits K-L-M'0 are nothing but stationary electrical waves in the field of the atom, each having its particular wave structure and frequency. It is known that waves of varying length do not interfere with one another as is shown by radio, even though they occupy the same area of space.
The whole concept of modern science will fall to the ground if the electron is a wave form having its origin in space. It would contradict the principal argument of Planck's theory which asserts that an electron is a particle whose energy is stepped up in "quantic jumps". It would also lead to the collapse of our conception of light and all the mechanics of relativity. Let the fall and collapse begin.
GB
-
Interesting gravityblock,
I recently punted my theory of an electromagnetic spheroidal wavepoint, with zero point twin singularities simultaneously rotating around a static vacuum core, in a pulsed theoretical electro-magnetic-mechanical system.
http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=182621
It supports what your saying here on a different scale.
Rob Mason :)
-
Hi GB,
thank you. I was up all night watching all 19 Vids in one stride . My head is still buzzing
Really phantatic
Regards
Kator01
-
Part 20 released on PESWiki, http://www.peswiki.com/index.php/Review:_Anti-Gravity_/_Cold_Fusion_Explained_In_Detail:_A_New_Era_in_Physics
GB
-
Segment 21 released, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wo1NrKiHxe8
GB
-
Hi GB - I've commented on your reverse engineering of Steorn's principle of operation, also as mentioned there, been watching S4T's videos as they are released. Since it sounds like you've got a handle on the matter, I'm hoping you can help me with some details I'm struggling with. Not going to bury you with questions, I just want to bounce some ideas off of you to see if I've got the right idea.
I understand (or think I do) from the videos that the proposition is that: If you can match the speed of light (em wave) in a medium with the speed of sound (mechanical resonance) in the nucleus of the atom(s) that comprise the medium, then energy transfer into or across that medium will be 100% because you've matched the impedance of these two variables (speed of light and frequency of the mechanical resonance in the nucleus).
Is my understanding correct, from what you understand? Would you mind correcting any mistakes?
That's very interesting, if correct. I'm a physics noob by far, and maybe those obstacles are far from simple to overcome. But to have a clearly defined problem... Identifying (correctly) the problem is half of the solution! Not sure if that was first said by someone important or who it was ;)
-
Hi GB - I've commented on your reverse engineering of Steorn's principle of operation, also as mentioned there, been watching S4T's videos as they are released. Since it sounds like you've got a handle on the matter, I'm hoping you can help me with some details I'm struggling with. Not going to bury you with questions, I just want to bounce some ideas off of you to see if I've got the right idea.
I understand (or think I do) from the videos that the proposition is that: If you can match the speed of light (em wave) in a medium with the speed of sound (mechanical resonance) in the nucleus of the atom(s) that comprise the medium, then energy transfer into or across that medium will be 100% because you've matched the impedance of these two variables (speed of light and frequency of the mechanical resonance in the nucleus).
Is my understanding correct, from what you understand? Would you mind correcting any mistakes?
That's very interesting, if correct. I'm a physics noob by far, and maybe those obstacles are far from simple to overcome. But to have a clearly defined problem... Identifying (correctly) the problem is half of the solution! Not sure if that was first said by someone important or who it was ;)
That's pretty much the basic idea and is my current understanding of it also. The electronic structure is where the speed of light in the "electron cloud" slows down to match the speed of mechanical waves in the nucleur structure.
GB
-
I applaud your efforts to keep us all here
up to date on these postings GravityBlock.
Sadly, (Google)-YouTube is satisfied to slam us
with a "Most Popular" as a default sort order
to keep up the best traffic-to-cost ratio
on their standard browser website.
Every time I visit a member by name,
I have to sort "By Date" forceably sadly.
They chose to hide qualifiers behind those java buttons,
instead of updating the URL path so us mere mortals
could make links that sort correctly in the first place.
(Please advise if you know the URL qualifiers to do this !)
Fortunately, that doesn't seem palatable
to the makers of mobile apps, and they won.
http://m.youtube.com/profile?gl=US&hl=en&user=seattle4truth
this is (by default) sorted by DATE,
and has the option to force HD by default.
Now admittadly,
he has decided to change music and repost them,
so they are not in perfect order by date now...
But this is the best bet to quickly see
if a new one has been posted yet,
without mucking with YouTube defaults
every friggin time one visits.
Hope this helps
Give it a try.
-
this is it.
follow these lines carefully and you will see
-
this is it.
follow these lines carefully and you will see
I couldn't have said this anybetter.
GB
-
Segment 23 is released, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RNSwZoFxnoA
GB
-
Thanks all for reviewing my work. My best and latest work is posted on Microsoft academic.
http://academic.research.microsoft.com/Author/7519801.aspx
I'll also be speaking at the Space and Propulsion Conference this March, with a peer reviewed paper. Come and see me.
http://www.ias-spes.org/SPESIF2011/AGENDA/2011_Agenda.pdf
I appreciate all of the feedback I can get. Lane Davis gave me some good feedback that resulted in a quantum leap in my papers.
Frank Znidarsic
-
Terrific thread GB - Thanks for starting it.
Frank - Love the videos. I am in the process of watching them now and plan to give your paper a thorough reading. Thanks for taking the time to make and share it all. You have a really nice way of teaching. Between you and the Resonance Project, I find myself pinned between two colliding worlds of physics that hopefully become one in the end. It's all relative.
-
They seem to have thrown me off of Microsoft academic. Direct links to my papers are below.
wbabin.net/science/znidarsic3.pdf
wbabin.net/science/znidarsic2.pdf
wbabin.net/science/znidarsic.pdf
Frank Znidarsic
-
Bad links - try again.
EDIT
Sorry
Disregard - now it works.
-
@Znidarsic, Welcome to the forum. In my opinion, you're doing a very good work. Thanks for sharing.
@Quarktoo, Thanks for joining the discussion.
@All, I've been debating if I should post this video or not in this thread, because it's speculation on my part at this time. However, this video may be showing a quantum transition on a macroscopic scale where the water is acting as a single atom or one big water molecule. The entire bowl of water will very quickly begin spinning at the critical speed when acoustically stimulated with the appropriate frequency. Also, take note when the rotation direction of the "wand" moving around the bowl is reversed, all of the water will very quickly reverse it's direction of rotation simultaneously and reach it's critical speed almost instantaneously as if it was one big water molecule or atom undergoing a single quantum transition. This behavior is similar to the quantized vortices in a superfluid.
Here's the video, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XUvbBK9fGrw
GB
-
What would happen if we substituted the water in the "singing bowl" with a superfluid, such as helium-4 or helium-3? Just a thought.
GB
-
What would happen if we substituted the water in the "singing bowl" with a superfluid, such as helium-4 or helium-3? Just a thought.
GB
be interesting to see. does water with a different specific gravity behave the same? does fluid viscosity matter? i guess comparing helium-3 or 4 to water would answer that. what effect, if any, infinite thermal conductivity would have would be interesting as well.
-
Thank singing boal is pretty neat. There has got to be a use for the effect as some sort of wind or water turbine. Keep thinking.
-
Hi Frank! I'm very glad to see you posting here and hope to learn more about your work. I am inspired by Lane's videos which seems I cannot get enough of. I really didn't even think much of quantum physics and also thought it was much too complicated to ponder until it was put into a perspective that I think most people like me can digest. Thank you!
Are you experiencing any rejection from your peers? I have tried recently to find anyone willing to discuss this topic in other forums and with friends, but, I don't get much response or all too often the topic moves to unrelated banter. It is my guess that you will have to go through the three phases of truth to get the recognition you deserve. Well, we all deserve it really...
So, now the question for me is, how can I use this information to further my research outside of technologies such as cold fusion? I first became interested in this stuff when Wilby and I discussed lightly the works done by Patterson and his power cell some years ago. As I studied, I came across a gentleman known as Stanley Meyer who successfully ran a dune buggy from water along with Paul Pantone who invented a fuel reformer that works on the same principals, although not as advanced as Meyer's. The difference I see between cold fusion and fuel reformation is the transmutation part. It appears the palladium goes through transmutation while the fuel reformers transmute the medium(water/heavy water) instead of the electrode material. My thoughts on that may be off, but, I am still learning and my math skills are not up to snuff quite yet.
Thanks again for sharing and I hope to see more of you and Lane in the public eye with success. Let's just hope your traveled path is not like the road Pons and Fleishman went down in the beginning.
Cheers!
-
"Znidarsic's Constant" 1,094,000 m/s - is the key to Cold Fusion and has many other practical applications of atomic resonance effects for control over the natural forces.
AlienScientist on youtube has recognized Znidarsic's work in a video titled, "The Answer to all our energy problems: Cold Fusion", http://www.youtube.com/user/AlienScientist#p/u/2/i29oXQHh-U4
AlienScientist has interviewed Znidarsic and released a few videos based around his work in regards to gravity modification:
"The Physics of Anti-gravity", http://www.youtube.com/user/AlienScientist#p/u/39/Rr_s28wIOzQ
"Gravity from Electromagnetism (Part 1)", http://www.youtube.com/user/AlienScientist#p/u/37/UJxs7dCpq9k
"Gravity from Electromagnetism (Part 2)", http://www.youtube.com/user/AlienScientist#p/u/38/EiG0VExMthw
GB
-
I'm in the beginning process of compiling a list of all empirical constants or equations that have been injected ad-hoc into physics. The purpose of this list is to derive the empirical constants or equations from first principals. I suspect, Znidarsic's constant for the quantum transitional speed will allow us to derive some of these other empirical constants from first principals (hopefully it will have a cascading effect). If you know of any, please let me know and I will add them to the list.
Example:
1) Balmer formula, an empirical equation discovered by Johann Balmer in 1885. B is a constant with the value of 3.6456×10-7 m or 364.56 nm. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Balmer_series
Thanks,
GB
-
Blocked again. I was to present a peer reviewed paper at the American Chemical Societies spring meeting in Anaheim this March. The session on Low Level Nuclear Reaction was was blocked from publication by the AIP. No papers, including mine, from this session will be published. I was to present a paper this March at the Space and Propulsion International Forum near Washington DC. Papers from this conference were also blocked from publication by the AIP. Who is doing this? Way have they did this? It came down from a high level at the American Institute of Physics and I have no clue why. Did they not hear what Obama is saying about new energy initiates. Thanks for supporting my, however, the state of things now are now pretty sad. I hope Andrei Rossi really has something, thats the only way this situation will turn around.
Frank Znidarsic
-
Frank,
This is a hard road to travel, don't lose hope. I have a simple question. Plugging 1.094 x 106 m/s2 into WolframAlpha gives a corresponding quanity of 1.094 x 106 N/kg, which is the gravitational field strength and a unit conversion of 111,557 g, which is the standard acceleration due to gravity at the surface of the earth. http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=1.094%C3%9710%5E6+meters+per+second+squared&lk=1
Is the quantum transitional speed of 1,094,000 m/s a constant everywhere, or is the quantum transitional speed a variable according to the distance from the surface of the earth?
[Edit:] My interpretations of the WolframAlpha results was totally incorrect as a basis for the quantum transitional speed being a variable according to the distance from the surface of the earth.
Thanks,
GB
-
It has nothing to to with the motion of the Earth of the gravity of the Earth.
Matter is the same on the moon,Mars, the sun and everywhere else as far as we can tell.
Frank z
-
Deleted.
GB
-
Blocked again. I was to present a peer reviewed paper at the American Chemical Societies spring meeting in Anaheim this March. The session on Low Level Nuclear Reaction was was blocked from publication by the AIP. No papers, including mine, from this session will be published. I was to present a paper this March at the Space and Propulsion International Forum near Washington DC. Papers from this conference were also blocked from publication by the AIP. Who is doing this? Way have they did this? It came down from a high level at the American Institute of Physics and I have no clue why. Did they not hear what Obama is saying about new energy initiates. Thanks for supporting my, however, the state of things now are now pretty sad. I hope Andrei Rossi really has something, thats the only way this situation will turn around.
Frank Znidarsic
If this is not an example of a conspiracy against "free" energy I don't know what is. If somebody can provide another explanation I would like to hear it.
By the way, I wouldn't take too much notice of what Obama says. He is a politician and as such, he may say what the public wishes to hear, whereas in reality he is doing the bidding of big fossil fuel interests.
I am going through the videos at the moment although I think it may take a couple of viewings before it sinks in. I am certainly no physicist but am not completely in the dark regarding classical physics.
-
Deleted.
GB
-
Frank,
I now see the mistake I made about the quantum transitional speed possibly being a variable. My sincere apologies.
GB
-
Energy packets the molecular orbitals. Check out "d" orbitals,"d" orbitals,"D"ORBITALS.
-
My work is at low energy and at ordinary conditions. This is where you need to be to build usable technology. I do nothing at super high temperatures that are found in super novas or super high gravitational fields that are found in a black hole. I stick within the conservations laws and look at what is possible at low energies. I have found that magnetism is not conserved. We know this, metals have been used for a long time in devices such as speakers to increase the strength of the electromagnetic-magnetic field. The other force fields also have dynamic magnetic components. The magnetic components of these fields ( gravitomagnetic and nuclear spin orbit ) should be variable, within the conservation laws, under the right conditions. It took me a long while to find the right condition but I think I have now found it. The conditions is the state of quantum transition. I done some work with Special relativity, however, I do not do much with Gravity and General Relativity. Why go any deeper when my core ideas have been rejected time after time by the peer review system? I believe Obama would be sad to know how progress in the field of Low Energy Nuclear Reactions has been held back for decades by the closed minded state of the peer review system. Someday this will prove to be quite a story.
Frank Znidarsic
-
I believe Obama would be sad to know how progress in the field of Low Energy Nuclear Reactions has been held back for decades by the closed minded state of the peer review system. Someday this will prove to be quite a story.
Frank Znidarsic
Someone more cynical than ourselves might say Obama knows perfectly well how this research has been held back for all these years.
His advisers have told him so because his friends do not want everyone to have it.
So to speak.
I watched with great interest the videos produced by Seattle4truth on this subject and have been reviewing some old documentary's about cold fusion. 10 years ago they (the scientists working on LENR) still didn't know what was producing this effect and had far too many theories about what was going on.
Now we have the Italian announcement .
Do you think they might have read your papers Mr Znidarsic?
Where do we, as an open source community, fit into all of this?
-
I don't know, but I hope to play a small part in this unfolding story.
Time will tell, however, I want things to happen fast as I am getting old.
Frank Znidarsic
-
Hey Mr. Z
I'm a big fan of what you have figured out. I would love to recreate the cold fusion experiments but they are outside of my budget. Would it be possible to do something with plasma as I suggested in this thread.
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=10023.0
Another question I have is, how do you apply the speed of transition to elements other than hydrogen and pallidum. Like hydrogen and nickel. Just looking for some lower budget solutions.
Thanks again for all of your hard work!!
-
I did all I could with a plasma. Frank Staenger and I tried everything, I even went into a submarine and looked around. Here is the link.
http://www.angelfire.com/scifi2/zpt/chapter2.html
I am trying to come up with some new ideas of my own right now. I believe that Rossi has beat us all to the gate.
Frank
-
I've been doing extensive research in this area and I know Rossi's method. Cold Fusion or LENR may be an inter-dimensional phenomenon. When the temperature is exact there is an endothermic reaction, thus the reason for stimulation to get the process started. Take a look at Rossi's patent, he describes an exothermal reaction, which is the opposite of an endothermic reaction. Endothermic describes a process or reaction in which the system absorbs energy from the surroundings in the form of heat. The opposite of an endothermic process is an exothermic process, one that releases energy in the form of heat. An endothermic reaction explains the lack of radiation in LENR. There is excess heat generated in LENR. This in no way invalidates Znidarsic's work. If we can find a relationship between the Avogadro constant to the 1,094,000 m/s, then Znidarsic's work can explain this inter-dimensional phenomenon. According to wiki, the precision of the Avogadro constant is the uncertainty in the value of the Planck constant. Since this is the case, then it's directly linked to the quantum transitional speed of 1,094,000 m/s.
Phonon Resonance is responsible for the endothermic reaction. I have the math equations and the resonance frequencies of all the elements to back this up. Frank's work is related to phonons. A phonon is a quantum mechanical description of a special type of vibrational motion, in which a lattice uniformly oscillates at the same frequency. This vibrational motion within the nucleus of an atom produces a mechanical wave at 1,094,000 m/s.
Rossi's patent also refers to transmutation. The conversion of one element (specifically one isotope) to another through a dimensional reaction occurs under select conditions of phonon resonance. Dimensional phonon resonance occurs when the space occupied by one isotope is exactly the same as that of another isotope in its rest state. This event only occur under the following two conditions: the expansion of an isotope by heating; or, the contraction of an isotope by cooling. Due to the natural characteristics of elemental properties, this event is extremely rare and one can only force the event under select conditions.
In subsequent postings, I'll release the phonon resonance frequencies for all the elements along with the math equations.
Here's a link to Rossi's patent, http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/RossiAmethodanda.pdf
Thanks,
GB
-
Phonon Resonance Calculator, http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=downloads;sa=downfile&id=456
If you have issues with downloading the file, then please leave me a PM. I'll post the math equations next. I need to convert them into a format in which this forum can accept since there is no latex function available here.
Thanks,
GB
-
To determine the phonon resonance of an isotope, it is necessary to apply the following formula:
whereas, d - Density in gm/cm3
Na - Avogadro's Constant
m - mass
Equation 1 of 4:
-
By determining the inverse, one will observe the linear atomic spacing.
Equation 2 of 4:
-
When an element is heated or cooled, the atomic spacing will change proportionally to the cube of the product of the temperature (increase/decrease) and the expansion coefficient. To understand, following is the mathematical model for determining the linear spacing in reference to temperature:
whereas, t - temperature increase
St - standardized temperature
Ec - expansion coefficient
Equation 3 of 4:
-
To place this in perspective, to determine the exacting temperature for a dimensional phonon reaction to occur, requires knowing the starting element (specifically the isotope of the starting element if more than one) and the element to be produced. Once this is known, you can apply the below formula. This will provide the temperature required within statistical probabilities. A statistical probability deals with the least significant digit (LSD) of each variable. In the case of phonon resonance, this is limited to the density. For example, the density of Ag is 10.50 gm/cm3. Taking that the accuracy is plus/minus 1 LSD, we can establish a variable range by applying the following: 1/1050 Or, +/- 0.0009524
Equation 4 of 4:
-
To place the mathematics in perspective, following is the calculations for the conversion of Ag107 to Au.
-
I noticed in the Phonon Resonance Calculator, under the Periodic Phonon Resonance tab, the minimum and maximum phonon resonance multiplies the density(gm/cm3) of the element by 1,000,000. This is close to the quantum transitional speed of 1,093,845.63. The Phonon resonance midpoint is calculated by density(gm/cm3) * 6.02214199*1023)/atomic mass(1/3), which is equivelant to equation 1?
GB
-
ROTFL!
Some of you guys are simply - the best!
Surely you cannot believe yourselves all this BS?
-
ROTFL!
Some of you guys are simply - the best!
Surely you cannot believe yourselves all this BS?
The elements can naturally decay into lighter elements on their own. The reverse process should be possible also. This process occurs in nature, and I don't see why we can't speed this process up under the right conditions. Transmutations is reported in LENR and other experiments. Do the research and don't spam this thread. You have no belief in anything, so move on. Here's a gold nugget you can shove up your ass.
GB
-
Ok, ok, cool down....
Which "natural transmutation processes" do you have on mind?
Oh, BTW, I don't need any delusional "amateur scientist" to tell me to move on... Ok?
-
Ok, ok, cool down....
Which "natural transmutation processes" do you have on mind?
Oh, BTW, I don't need any delusional "amateur scientist" to tell me to move on... Ok?
http://www.lbl.gov/abc/Basic.html
This is a quote from the above link, "The emission of an a particle, or 4He nucleus, is a process called a decay. Since a particles contain protons and neutrons, they must come from the nucleus of an atom. The nucleus that results from a decay will have a mass and charge different from those of the original nucleus. A change in nuclear charge means that the element has been changed into a different element. Only through such radioactive decays or nuclear reactions can transmutation, the age-old dream of the alchemists, actually occur."
Move on dumbass!
GB
-
Lol, what an idiot..
The "Philosopher's stone" is quite on level with your "knowledge"...
-
Lol, what an idiot..
The "Philosopher's stone" is quite on level with your "knowledge"...
Your the idiot, because you didn't know transmutations naturally occur in nature. Your "false knowledge" and belief in nothing is quite on level with the ones who said the atomic bomb will never go off or airplanes would never fly, etc.
GB
-
;D
Don't make me laugh, we all know what decay (or even a natural transmutation of the elements to a LOWER energy state is...). Where energy is released, etc.
I ask you, dumbass (oh, how original!), which natural transmutations lead to a more complex elements? Naturally, without any energy input?
(And please don't edit your posts so fast, i have a difficulty to follow your "reasoning".. )
-
;D
Don't make me laugh, we all know what decay (or even a natural transmutation of the elements to a LOWER energy state is...). Where energy is released, etc.
I ask you, dumbass (oh, how original!), which natural transmutations lead to a more complex elements? Naturally, without any energy input?
(And please don't edit your posts so fast, i have a difficulty to follow your "reasoning".. )
Ok, ok, cool down....
Which "natural transmutation processes" do you have on mind?
Your first question is different than your last question, as you can see from the above quotes. If you look at my reply to your first question, I said, "The reverse should be possible also", and this is exaxtly what occurs in LENR and other experiments. I never said the reverse happens in nature to form heavier or more complex elements, although it wouldn't surprise me if it does on a smaller scale. Now, you're trying to take things out of context and twisting words just like a troll. You didn't know transmutations naturally occured, so you then formed another similar but different question to cover up your ignorance. I'm no longer responding to you.
GB
-
You can twist your views however you want.
I became "interested" when you said "even the reverse should be possible"...
You know, the "REAL" LENR/CANR stuff...
So, your previous Math is showing... What exactly? That you know how to divide and multiply? ;)
It's fine by me if you don't want to talk to me anymore.
Maybe someday I could learn to live with that... ;D
-
Below is a snapshot of section 12 on page 29 in a publication by Infinite Energy on LENR, http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/NagelDJscientific.pdf
The highlighted text says peaks in excess power generation aligns with Phonon frequencies in the PdD system. Phonon resonance is the key to LENR.
GB
-
Spinn, your turning this thread into a flame. If you don't have anything positive to add please quit posting. and Gravity, your feeding right into it, just ignore these people.
Gravity, how does the excel sheet help us with figuring out how to apply other elements to Mr.Z formulas? Please explain for the rest of us dummies.
-
@All: In the Excel sheet I posted earlier, there are 4 tabs at the bottom for additional functions and data. I attached an image to this post showing where the tabs are located. The tabs are labeled, "Periodic Table Phonon Resonance", "Conversion Calculator", "Temperature Calculator", and "Results & Graphs".
@Tempest: The excel sheet should be helpful in determining alternative elements to be used in LENR. We need to find elements giving the highest excess heat production for the least amount of input energy with the least amount of costs for the elements. Hopefully Znidarsic can be helpful in this area. If not, then we'll have to figure out how to apply this ourselves. It may take a little time and research, but it should be workable since we have the formulas and phonon resonance frequencies for all of the elements. The more people who gets involved, the quicker we can apply this.
Thanks,
GB
-
So Gravity, from your charts, do you think something like this might work? I know that Mr. Z said that he did every thing he could with Plasma, but I keep looking at it because of the cost of the experiment.
This would provide the heat, light and correct freq. (if your calculations are correct)
-
Rossi's patent states a nickel powder, even of nanometric dimensions, or nickel granules or bars is used and the nickel powder contains catalyzer materials. The powder will increase the surface area where the LENR's are taking place as suggested by the "Infinite Energy" publication. Also it states the temperature should be preferably from 150 to 500o C, but it can be a variable. The phonon resonant frequency is the linear spacing in reference to temperature as calculated by equation 3 of 4 in Post #40 . The below screen capture for nickel will help to visualize this.
GB
-
Is that a no in your opinion then??
-
Is that a no in your opinion then??
I wouldn't rule it out. I need more time to digest all of this information.
GB
-
Tempest,
Your idea may work. I doubt Znidarsic hit the correct frequencies in his plasma experiments. We need to make sure we're not over-looking something. This is a good start IMO.
GB
-
Below is a quote on page 14 from a publication titled, "Anomalous Heat Generation during Hydrogenation of Carbon (Phenanthrene)," http://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/MizunoTanomaloushb.pdf
With this technique, unlike electrochemical cold fusion, there is no electrolysis power or other
direct input power. The only input is to the heater, so once high-temperature triggers a reaction,
all of the anomalous heat is self-sustaining. The reaction could be sustained without electricity
by insulating the cell to maintain the temperature, but this would make it difficult to control the
temperature.
GB
-
LENR is not cold fusion, it uses the weak nucleur force, http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=10230.msg272847#msg272847
This is the real deal. It's mainstream now. Lets get busy to replicate.
GB
-
I don't know, but I hope to play a small part in this unfolding story.
Time will tell, however, I want things to happen fast as I am getting old.
Frank Znidarsic
Znidarsic,
Here's your opportunity to play a small part in this unfolding story. Please extend your model from the quantum world to the molecular or macroscopic world in regards to the molecular orbitals, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molecular_orbital
A molecular orbital (MO) can specify the electron configuration of a molecule: the spatial distribution and energy of one (or one pair of) electron(s). Most commonly an MO is represented as a linear combination of atomic orbitals (the LCAO-MO method), especially in qualitative or very approximate usage. They are invaluable in providing a simple model of bonding in molecules, understood through molecular orbital theory.
Some properties:
1.) The number of molecular orbitals is equal to the number of atomic orbitals included in the linear expansion, <----- I've already posted information about this linear expansion in regards to Phonon Resonance.
2.) If the molecule has some symmetry, the degenerate atomic orbitals (with the same atomic energy) are grouped in linear combinations (called symmetry adapted atomic orbitals (SO)) which belong to the representation of the symmetry group, so the wave functions that describe the group are known as symmetry-adapted linear combinations (SALC).
3.) The number of molecular orbitals belonging to one group representation is equal to the number of symmetry-adapted atomic orbitals belonging to this representation,
4.) Within a particular representation, the symmetry-adapted atomic orbitals mix more if their atomic energy levels are closer.
I believe the above is all related to Phonon Resonance, but your model needs to be extendend so we can understand the LENR's of the weak nuclear force. If my memory serves me correctly, I believe you have previously stated the weak nuclear force isn't understood very well. I think it's time for us to begin to learn more about this weak nuclear force. If you disagree, please express your opinions here. The only way progress is going to happen which is beneficial to all, is to have an open discussion in a constructive way. I think most of us here would highly value your opinion and would like to hear where you stand on all of this.
Thank You,
GB
-
Znidarsic,
Here's your opportunity to play a small part in this unfolding story. Please extend your model from the quantum world to the molecular or macroscopic world in regards to the molecular orbitals, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molecular_orbital (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molecular_orbital)
A molecular orbital (MO) can specify the electron configuration of a molecule: the spatial distribution and energy of one (or one pair of) electron(s). Most commonly an MO is represented as a linear combination of atomic orbitals (the LCAO-MO method), especially in qualitative or very approximate usage. They are invaluable in providing a simple model of bonding in molecules, understood through molecular orbital theory.
Some properties:
1.) The number of molecular orbitals is equal to the number of atomic orbitals included in the linear expansion, <----- I've already posted information about this linear expansion in regards to Phonon Resonance.
2.) If the molecule has some symmetry, the degenerate atomic orbitals (with the same atomic energy) are grouped in linear combinations (called symmetry adapted atomic orbitals (SO)) which belong to the representation of the symmetry group, so the wave functions that describe the group are known as symmetry-adapted linear combinations (SALC).
3.) The number of molecular orbitals belonging to one group representation is equal to the number of symmetry-adapted atomic orbitals belonging to this representation,
4.) Within a particular representation, the symmetry-adapted atomic orbitals mix more if their atomic energy levels are closer.
I believe the above is all related to Phonon Resonance, but your model needs to be extendend so we can understand the LENR's of the weak nucleur force. If you disagree, please express your opinions here. The only way progress is going to happen which is beneficial to all, is to have an open discussion in a constructive way. I think most of us here would highly value your opinion and would like to here where you stand on all of this.
Thank You,
GB
Energy wise this can be useful in splitting water with low energy and collecting it as electricity with a fuel cell.
Phonon resonance could also explain how freddy can run a car on hydrogen. I believe his electrode tubes are tuned to a certain acoustic frequency.
I would rather much see someone else making gold first to at least prove that phonon resonance works.
Even though the math, process and science is open to this extraordinary achievement it's amazing to see how naive Joe Champion is.
http://www.drjoechampion.com/ (http://www.drjoechampion.com/phonon.data/math.explanation.htm)
Apparently he's about to mass produce gold. When you can mass produce almost any metal from another abundant metal dirt cheaply then you will cause a serious disrupt across the entire corrupt economy that is based on scarcity.
What's the point for precious metals if they are mass produced by the tons weekly. I always admire people who explore science on their own but I get baffled by the shear ignorance that comes with it about current world affairs.
Putting mass produced gold behind a vault won't magically solve all our problems. What will is applying this technology into practical solutions. Cheap gold conductors, cheap platinum fuel cells, cheap neo magnets...
-
I would rather much see someone else making gold first to at least prove that phonon resonance works.
Phonon Resonance Transmutation:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nRIsPq2C-5Q
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vprDxvQ_LuE
This result of metal formation (e.i.gold) was produced by two steps: 1- Using phonon resonance reactor for 10 days; 2- Heated the output til molten then poured it and let it cool.
GB
-
Don't forget about the "Infinite Energy" publication where LetsLab found 2 peaks of excess heat generation aligned with the phonon frequencies. The information at this time is overwhelming pointing to Phonon Resonance using the weak nuclear force in LENR.
GB
-
Even though the math, process and science is open to this extraordinary achievement it's amazing to see how naive Joe Champion is.
http://www.drjoechampion.com/ (http://www.drjoechampion.com/phonon.data/math.explanation.htm)
Apparently he's about to mass produce gold. When you can mass produce almost any metal from another abundant metal dirt cheaply then you will cause a serious disrupt across the entire corrupt economy that is based on scarcity.
What's the point for precious metals if they are mass produced by the tons weekly. I always admire people who explore science on their own but I get baffled by the shear ignorance that comes with it about current world affairs.
Putting mass produced gold behind a vault won't magically solve all our problems. What will is applying this technology into practical solutions. Cheap gold conductors, cheap platinum fuel cells, cheap neo magnets...
Well --- There goes my IRA .CCCRRRRAAAAPPPPP!!!!!!!!!!!
-
Well --- There goes my IRA .CCCRRRRAAAAPPPPP!!!!!!!!!!!
Gold, Platinum, Paladium, and Silver prices live, http://www.monex.com/liveprices
GB
-
I hope he makes it, but I won't bet on it. 150 years of suppression and deceit, you have to be a complete fool to ignore that. USA this USA that, I hope he can keep his head on his neck as I hear USA made guillotines are the sharpest.
-
Fig. 14. Analysis executed with an SEM on an area of the cathode surface after 4000 sec. of plasma
–
January 2004.
www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/CirilloDtransmutat.pdf
-
Fig. 14. Analysis executed with an SEM on an area of the cathode surface after 4000 sec. of plasma
–
January 2004.
www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/CirilloDtransmutat.pd
The "f" was truncated in the above link, http://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/CirilloDtransmutat.pdf
Thanks Wings,
GB
-
The "d" orbital dz2y center torus ring is the "clutch" or energy transfer for the two outer lobes. The electron flows like river in a figure 8 patten in 3D. The repelling field of the magnetic force; dynamic flow-magnetic current. This separate field is reason for the spin and lift seen in superconductors.
-
Hi,
I have read the three papers, and the third paper is the easiest to understand in my opinion (written with great patience and detailed explanation -- a ground breaking work really need that to get anywhere). However, there are still something important appears just very confusing. The most obvious one is the definition of the constant K_{-e} called the elastic constant, which is supposed to be a constant, but in its definition, there is a variable r_x: K_{-e} = { F_{max} \over r_x } (see equation 4 in the third paper here: http://www.wbabin.net/science/znidarsic3.pdf ). In the end of this paper, even a numerical value is given to K_{-e}, but it is also said in the text:
"The variable, classical elastic constant of the electron K_{-e} emerged from this redistribution. It is expressed in equation (4). The elastic constant of the electric field resembles that of a gum band in that it decreases with displacement. "
I really hope Dr. Znidarsic can see this and explain it. Is K_{-e} a variable constant? It already reads like a paradox, so frankly I am quite confused -- I am shamed and humbled, as this is supposed to be understood with only elementary education as people here are saying.
lanenal
-
The elastic constant is constant at a certain displacement. It varies inversley with displacement. Rubber bands do this also, they get softer as they are stretched, thus their "elastic constant" is dependent upon their position. Take a balloon. It is hard to blow when it is deflated. Its elastic constant is stiff. As the balloon is inflated it is easier to put air into it. Its elastic constant decreases with its inflation. The same sort of thing happens with electron. I hope this helps.
Frank Z
-
War on Cold Fusion - The Hidden Truth Exposed (Fire from Water), http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7FilflaqbVI
GB
-
Znidarsic & All,
In 1999, researchers from the University of Vienna demonstrated that wave-particle duality applied to molecules such as fullerenes. In addition to being created in the lab, Fullerenes are produced in nature, hidden in soot and formed by lightning discharges in the atmosphere. Could fullerenes be related to lightning balls or small plasma fireballs since they can withstand high temperatures for relativly long periods of time and are formed by lightning discharges or carbon plasma arcs? As the discovery of the fullerene family came after buckminsterfullerene, the shortened name 'fullerene' is used to refer to the family of fullerenes. The suffix “ene†indicates that each C atom is covalently bonded to three others (instead of the maximum of four), a situation that classically would correspond to the existence of bonds involving two pairs of electrons (“double bondsâ€). A fully developed theory of C60 solids superconductivity is still lacking, but it has been widely accepted that strong electronic correlations and the Jahn-Teller electron-phonon coupling produce local electron-pairings that show a high transition temperature close to the insulator-metal transition. Could this be responsible for the small pockets of superconductivity in LENR? The wiki article on the Jahn-Teller effect even mentions the "d" orbitals in which BobTEW has referred to a few times. ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fullerene ) & ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jahn-Teller_effect ) & ( http://www.angelfire.com/scifi2/zpt/chapter2.html )
Endohedral fullerenes are fullerenes that have additional atoms, ions, or clusters enclosed within their inner spheres. The first lanthanum C60 complex was synthesized in 1985 called La@C60. The @ sign in the name reflects the notion of a small molecule trapped inside a shell. Two types of endohedral complexes exist: endohedral metallofullerenes and non-metal doped fullerenes. ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Endohedral_fullerene )
Endohedral hydrogen fullerene or H2@C60 is an endohedral fullerene containing molecular hydrogen. H2@C60 is found to be a stable molecule. it survives 10 minutes at 500 °C and shows the same chemical reactivity as empty C60. The electronic properties are also largely unaffected. ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Endohedral_hydrogen_fullerene )
Field emission (FE) (also known as electron field emission) is an emission of electrons induced by external electromagnetic fields. Field emission can happen from solid and liquid surfaces, or individual atoms into vacuum or open air, or result in promotion of electrons from the valence to conduction band of semiconductors. The terminology is historical because related phenomena of surface photoeffect, thermionic emission or Richardson-Dushman effect and "cold electronic emission", i.e. the emission of electrons in strong static (or quasi-static) electric fields, were discovered and studied independently from 1880s to 1930s. When field emission is used without qualifiers it typically means the "cold emission." ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Field_electron_emission )
Let me know what you think of the above. I've been working on this 24/7. The Fullerenes may answer a lot of questions regarding LENR, and I think they fit in very well with your "model" where we don't need to extend it to the molecular level.
Thanks,
GB
-
In addition to my previous post on Fullerenes, carbon composites display an apparent negative resistance. Znidarsic mentions Chung's negative resistor on his website. ( http://www.wings.buffalo.edu/academic/department/eng/mae/cmrl/Apparent%20negative%20electrical%20resistance%20in%20carbon%20fiber%20composites.pdf ) & ( http://www.angelfire.com/scifi2/zpt/chapter4.html )
It's possible that small trace amounts of Fullerenes are formed in the metals during the manufacturing process, when the metals are etched, or during the hydrogenation loading process of the metals, etc. This could be the reason why some batches of metals will display excess heat generation, while other batches do not. Also, could be an explanation to the excess heat generation coming in bursts instead of a continuous display of excess heat generation due to only small trace amounts of Fullerenes being present to allow for small pockets of superconductivity. A common method used to produce fullerenes is to send a large current between two nearby graphite electrodes in an inert atmosphere. The resulting carbon plasma arc between the electrodes cools into sooty residue from which many fullerenes can be isolated. Just a thought.
GB
-
In the Blink of Bird’s Eye, a Model for Quantum Navigation:
http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2011/01/quantum-birds/ (http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2011/01/quantum-birds/)
H@C60:
-
The magnet-iron oxide here is the total picture cut in half;the wild clown. White eyes are the photon pulse; white light energy. Blue color is the cold figure eight FLOW of the "electrons"; the repel-push of the magnet. The red ruby and nose is one of the center dark energy GRAVITY rings {there is three of them}. The yellow plates at the corner of eyes are same seen on Saturn's North Pole; ah the power of spin! The flair out at the ears is the Aurora's. The last remaining yellow hot resistive lines is the attaction part of the magnet.
-
I am going through the videos and the paper "quantum cold case mysteries resolved". On page 15 of this paper there is a calculation of the spring constant - k. Two protons inside a nucleus are modeled in terms of a spring using Hooke's Law - k=Fmax/Xmax. Fmax is given as 29.053N which is the maximum electrostatic force experienced by 2 protons being pushed together. This occurs at the coulomb barrier - 1.409fm.
My question is:- Is this force (29.053N) the same if the proton is inside the nucleus and external to the nucleus?
I am somewhat confused because the displacement used in the equation (Xmax) is twice the fermi spacing (what is that?) rather than 2*1.409fm (which is where Fmax was calculated).
-
I am going through the videos and the paper "quantum cold case mysteries resolved". On page 15 of this paper there is a calculation of the spring constant - k. Two protons inside a nucleus are modeled in terms of a spring using Hooke's Law - k=Fmax/Xmax. Fmax is given as 29.053N which is the maximum electrostatic force experienced by 2 protons being pushed together. This occurs at the coulomb barrier - 1.409fm.
My question is:- Is this force (29.053N) the same if the proton is inside the nucleus and external to the nucleus?
I am somewhat confused because the displacement used in the equation (Xmax) is twice the fermi spacing (what is that?) rather than 2*1.409fm (which is where Fmax was calculated).
Tomd000, I'll let Znidarsic answer those questions, for he can answer them much better than I can. However, I would like to point out for those who may be questioning the modeling of this as a spring, that the harmonic oscillator is an important model in physics for a simple exact solution. ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_harmonic_oscillator ) & ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harmonic_oscillator )
The quantum harmonic oscillator is the quantum mechanical analog of the classical harmonic oscillator. Because an arbitrary potential can be approximated as a harmonic potential at the vicinity of a stable equilibrium point, it is one of the most important model systems in quantum mechanics. Furthermore, it is one of the few quantum mechanical systems for which a simple exact solution is known.
GB
-
The elastic constant is constant at a certain displacement. It varies inversley with displacement. Rubber bands do this also, they get softer as they are stretched, thus their "elastic constant" is dependent upon their position. Take a balloon. It is hard to blow when it is deflated. Its elastic constant is stiff. As the balloon is inflated it is easier to put air into it. Its elastic constant decreases with its inflation. The same sort of thing happens with electron. I hope this helps.
Frank Z
Yes, thank you for this analogy, it is easy enough to understand. But then why in the end of the same paper, a numerical constant value is given for K_{-e}?
lanenal
-
The elastic constant is constant at a certain displacement. It varies inversley with displacement. Rubber bands do this also, they get softer as they are stretched, thus their "elastic constant" is dependent upon their position. Take a balloon. It is hard to blow when it is deflated. Its elastic constant is stiff. As the balloon is inflated it is easier to put air into it. Its elastic constant decreases with its inflation. The same sort of thing happens with electron. I hope this helps.
Frank Z
Ok, what is it? Does "elastic constant" changes, or not?
The balloon analogy is not suitable.
Inflating a balloon is a well understood subject, where the relations of volume, pressure, surface area and a stretching constant are not linked linearly.
A constant should be a constant, don't you think? At least under defined conditions.
Cheers!
-
It's a contant at a certain displacement. If the displacement changes, then the constant also changes. If the displacement doesn't change, then it remains a constant according to that displacement. This is no different than "c", which refers to a constant and is related to the speed of light. The speed of light is a constant in a vacuum, but if you change the medium then the speed of light also changes, thus "c" changes.......so one could argue that "c" isn't a contant. The "elastic contant" and "c" are both terms which have been defined by the physics establishment. If you don't like the definitions or the terms, then complain to the ones who defined them or chose the terms to describe them, and not to the ones who use them. It appears there are those who want to nitpick at certain terms or definitions. Nitpick all you want, but it doesn't change anything. Call it a variable, a variable constant, a constant at a certain displacement, or whatever you like, but it will still give you the correct result if used properly.
GB
-
I have been reading the Znidarsic theories with interest and I am trying to get a deeper understanding of the terms involved.
Can someone go into detail about the "elastic discontinuity" and possibly give a good explanation and definition, along with analogies, pictures, etc.
Thank you :)
-
I have been reading the Znidarsic theories with interest and I am trying to get a deeper understanding of the terms involved.
Can someone go into detail about the "elastic discontinuity" and possibly give a good explanation and definition, along with analogies, pictures, etc.
Thank you :)
Have you looked at Znidarsic's website? If not, then it may be helpful. ( http://www.angelfire.com/scifi2/zpt/index.html )
Read the papers and watch the videos over and over again to get a deeper understanding. We all need to do this, because it takes time and repetition to fully digest this stuff. Don't give up, it will eventually come to you.
[Edit:] Water sphere in zero gravity showing waves, elastic collisions, and mass transfers ( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cXsvy2tBJlU )
GB
-
It looks like standing waves are pinned at the discontinuity.
http://www.angelfire.com/scifi2/zpt/chapterb.html#Pg10
-
It looks like standing waves are pinned at the discontinuity.
http://www.angelfire.com/scifi2/zpt/chapterb.html#Pg10
A persistent flow of water over a period of time has slowly carved the Grand Canyon. Persistence is a powerful force, even a small continuous drop of water. Thanks Khanster and welcome to the forum.
GB
-
It's a contant at a certain displacement. If the displacement changes, then the constant also changes. If the displacement doesn't change, then it remains a constant according to that displacement. This is no different than "c", which refers to a constant and is related to the speed of light. The speed of light is a constant in a vacuum, but if you change the medium then the speed of light also changes, thus "c" changes.......so one could argue that "c" isn't a contant. The "elastic contant" and "c" are both terms which have been defined by the physics establishment. If you don't like the definitions or the terms, then complain to the ones who defined them or chose the terms to describe them, and not to the ones who use them. It appears there are those who want to nitpick at certain terms or definitions. Nitpick all you want, but it doesn't change anything. Call it a variable, a variable constant, a constant at a certain displacement, or whatever you like, but it will still give you the correct result if used properly.
GB
A constant is a constant. Sorry. You clever guys should know better.
What's all the fuzz about "c"?
FYI, the Cat6e net cable typically reaches 0,8c of a signal propagation.
While the "c" remains a constant.
And I'm just - nitpicking?
Lol!
Hey GB, you're a very smart greenhorn, I must admit!
-
Spinn_MP,
Khanster with only 2 posts under his belt has contributed more to this forum than your 187 posts, and this includes all of your posts under previous banned alias's. You should be proud of yourself for nothing. What a way to be. Now, I see this leading to another distraction, which is what you do the best, so I once again will let you have the last word.
GB
-
Spinn_MP,
Khanster with only 2 posts under his belt has contributed more to this forum than your 187 posts, and this includes all of your posts under previous banned alias's. You should be proud of yourself for nothing. What a way to be. Now, I see this leading to another distraction, which is what you do the best, so I once again will let you have the last word.
GB
Lol, your anger seems - pristine?
Don't you worry, I truly like all that Greenhorn's knowledge of yours...
I'm sure you'll find your way to keep us informed... In the right way, of course.
Oh, GB... I wish you ALL the best!
-
A small particle of carboxy fullerene is placed on top of heat sensitive explosive. Irradiation with a 785 nm laser (1W) results in an instantaneous explosion. In the absence of carboxy fullerenes, the laser with output power of (5W), failed to ignite the explosives. ( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rJvh0yA69ow )
GB
-
On page 36 of "quantum cold case mysteries resolved" the mass of the electron is given as M-e=2Fmax*Rc/c^2. Can somebody explain how this equation is derived?
-
On page 36 of "quantum cold case mysteries resolved" the mass of the electron is given as M-e=2Fmax*Rc/c^2. Can somebody explain how this equation is derived?
That paper is from Lane Davis and is not Znidarsic's work, although it is related.
Fmax = 29.053N
Rc = 1.409 x 10-15m
M-e = 9.109×10-31kg
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=2+%28+29.053N+x+1.409+x+10%5E-15m%29+%2Fspeed+of+light%5E2
GB
-
Phonons have virtually no role to play in high-temp super conductors :o
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-temperature_superconductivity#Qualitative_explanation_of_the_spin-fluctuation_mechanism
In a conventional superconductor, Cooper pairs are created as follows. When an electron moves through the system, it creates a depression in the atomic lattice through lattice vibrations known as phonons. If the depression of the lattice is strong enough, another electron can fall into the depression created by the first electron—the so-called water-bed effect—and a Cooper pair is formed. When this effect becomes strong enough, Cooper pairs win over the creation of holes behind the electrons, and the normal conductor turns into a superconductor through an unlimited supply of electrons by the creation of Cooper pairs.
In a high-Tc superconductor, the mechanism is extremely similar to a conventional superconductor. Except, in this case, phonons virtually play no role and their role is replaced by spin-density waves. As all conventional superconductors are strong phonon systems, all high-Tc superconductors are strong spin-density wave systems, within close vicinity of a magnetic transition to, for example, an antiferromagnet. When an electron moves in a high-Tc superconductor, its spin creates a spin-density wave around it. This spin-density wave in turn causes a nearby electron to fall into the spin depression created by the first electron (water-bed effect again). Hence, again, a Cooper pair is formed. Eventually, when the system temperature is lowered, more spin density waves and Cooper pairs are created and superconductivity begins when an unlimited supply of Cooper pairs, denoted as a phase transition, happens. Note that in high-Tc systems, as these systems are magnetic systems due to the Coulomb interaction, there is a strong Coulomb repulsion between electrons. This Coulomb repulsion prevents pairing of the Cooper pairs on the same lattice site. The pairing of the electrons occur at near-neighbor lattice sites as a result. This is the so-called d-wave pairing, where the pairing state has a node (zero) at the origin.
-
Phonons have virtually no role to play in high-temp super conductors :o
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-temperature_superconductivity#Qualitative_explanation_of_the_spin-fluctuation_mechanism
Khanster,
Here's the thing. Some superconductors are unconventional and can't be explaind by BCS or related theories. ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superconductor_classification#By_the_understanding_we_have_about_them )
A fully developed theory of C60 solids superconductivity is still lacking, but it has been widely accepted that strong electronic correlations and the Jahn-Teller electron-phonon coupling produce local electron-pairings that show a high transition temperature close to the insulator-metal transition. ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fullerenes#Superconductivity )
Now, since the fullerenes have wave-particle duality properties, we can have many C60 molecules, acting as one big single atom or molecule undergoing a quantum transition at the same time which magnifies the effect, and this initiates the LENR. When an atom or many molecules acting as a single atom undergoes a quantum transition, then all of the forces, such as the electromagnetic, weak nuclear force, and strong nuclear forces all converge. This allows the coloumb barrier to be breached and/or allows the weak nuclear force to change the flavor of the quarks in the neutrons/protons at low energies resulting in LENR. Phonon Resonance can force a "false quantum transition".
GB
-
Room temperature superconductors... They need to be invented soon ;D
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metallic_hydrogen#Superconductivity
SuperconductivityIn 1968, Ashcroft put forward that metallic hydrogen may be a superconductor, up to room temperature (~290 K), far higher than any other known candidate material. This stems from its extremely high speed of sound and the expected strong coupling between the conduction electrons and the lattice vibrations.[7]
Anti-gravity cars and hover-boards need to become a reality...
-
Room temperature superconductors... They need to be invented soon ;D
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metallic_hydrogen#Superconductivity
Anti-gravity cars and hover-boards need to become a reality...
This is a good find! Metallic hydrogen shouldn't be ruled out. This is another example of an unconventional superconductor with a strong electron-phonon coupling similiar to the C60 fullerenes. Metallic hydrogen is a form of degnerate matter. ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Degenerate_matter )
This needs to be researched more. Thanks Khanster.
GB
-
http://www.physorg.com/news/2011-02-neutron-analysis-reveals-doors-superconductivity.html
Neutron scattering analysis of two families of iron-based materials suggests that the magnetic interactions thought responsible for high-temperature superconductivity may lie "two doors down": The key magnetic exchange pairings occur in a next-nearest-neighbor ordering of atoms, rather than adjacent atoms.
-
Khanster,
IMO, the small pockets of superconductivity occurring in LENR's experiments is partly due to the low energy nuclear reactions. I don't think there's much research and experiments being done by the scientific community looking into superconductivity during nuclear reactions, during transmutation of the elements, etc. We need to force these nuclear reactions at low energies and this can be done with phonon resonance. For the C60 fullerene to become stable, the carbon atom needs 8 electrons in its outer shell, and covalently bonding with 3 other atoms will only make 7 electrons in its outer shell. This means that the one unbonded electron on every carbon atom is free to float around all of the compound's atoms. Electrons carry charge, so this free electron movement means that the buckminsterfullerene can conduct electricity very well. Below is an illustration of Bucky ball (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:C60_isosurface.png) with isosurface of ground state electron density calculated with DFT.
( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buckminsterfullerene#Structure )
In addition to the C60 being an excellent conductor, it has wave-particle duality properties. This is important, because we can have 60 atoms undergoing a single quantum transition in the same instance where all of the natural forces pinned within this molecule converge, and this has more energy than a single atom undergoing a quantum transition. This allows either the coloumb barrier to be breached, and/or allows the weak nuclear force to change the flavors of the quarks making up the neutrons and protons which leads to LENR's. Normally an electron within a single atom will absorb or release a photon when it undergoes a quantum transition. We need to amplify this, in order for LENR's to proceed, and it's not going to happen with individual electrons within an atom undergoing random quantum transitions releasing and absorbing photons. Let's not overlook the bigger picture.
GB
-
Ok so where do this leave us. Anybody go a cheap source for carbon bucky balls?? Then what??
-
The Space and Propulsion International Forum has filled up the house with people coming. I have completed a preview of my 30 minute talk. It is still a work in progress. A wmv movie file is linked below with the preview.
http://www.angelfire.com/scifi2/zpt/movies/ZNIDARSIC.wmv
I hope it goes well at the conference.
Frank Znidarsic
-
Ok so where do this leave us. Anybody go a cheap source for carbon bucky balls?? Then what??
A common method used to produce fullerenes is to send a large current between two nearby graphite electrodes in an inert atmosphere. The resulting carbon plasma arc between the electrodes cools into sooty residue from which many fullerenes can be isolated. A cheap source would be from candle soot, then we could coat our metals with the fullerenes, etc.
Maybe we're making this more complicated than need be. If the two girls in the below image can build a LENR cell, why can't we? Try it with and without the cheap carbon bucky balls and compare the results. ( http://jlnlabs.online.fr/cfr/html/cfrmhmc.htm )
GB
-
In video 7, Seattle4truth states the following:
"By stimulating the Bose-Einstein condensate at 1.094 megahertz metres it forces the speed of light in the electronic structure to equal the speed of sound in the nuclear structure". How is this? In one of the videos he mentioned that freezing a B.E condensate to close to absolute zero would slow the speed of light. However I don't see how that helps here.
-
In video 7, Seattle4truth states the following:
"By stimulating the Bose-Einstein condensate at 1.094 megahertz metres it forces the speed of light in the electronic structure to equal the speed of sound in the nuclear structure". How is this? In one of the videos he mentioned that freezing a B.E condensate to close to absolute zero would slow the speed of light. However I don't see how that helps here.
Exactly! We don't have superconductors or superfluids at room temperatures. However, all of the atoms in the BEC behaves as if it were a single atom. This is why I think the fullerenes C60 molecules with wave-particle duality properties is our best option at the moment. There will be 60 atoms in the C60 molecule behaving as a single atom with the same quantum transition. If we can get millions of the C60 molecules behaving as if it were a single atom undergoing a quantum transition through phonon resonance, then the effect will be greatly increased and we will have a BEC at the LENR operating temperatures.
GB
-
The fullerenes is being linked to dark matter/energy in the universe. Look at the ground state electron density of the fullerenes in the illustration posted in reply #100. This pretty much shields whatever is contained within the cage of the fullerenes, thus it's not detected by our instruments. Our pineal gland or third-eye operates in a similiar fashion. "Project Looking Glass" is also based around this idea. Huge amounts of fullerenes are being discovered in the universe now.
GB
-
@GravityBlock
Not sure if this has been posted. Found a patent on isolating fullerenes. Looks interesting. It mentions that fullerenes in soot (contained in a quartz vessel) can be evaporated by microwaves in seconds. The fullerenes gas (brown stuff) then condenses on the walls of the vessel. Interesting stuff.
United States Patent 5458742
http://www.freepatentsonline.com/5458742.html
-
@GravityBlock
Not sure if this has been posted. Found a patent on isolating fullerenes. Looks interesting. It mentions that fullerenes in soot (contained in a quartz vessel) can be evaporated by microwaves in seconds. The fullerenes gas (brown stuff) then condenses on the walls of the vessel. Interesting stuff.
United States Patent 5458742
http://www.freepatentsonline.com/5458742.html
Staffman,
This is an excellent find. Being able to isolate the fullerenes in the soot is extremely important. For some reason I over-looked this. The process doesn't look too complicated. This should greatly increase our chance of success for a "controlled" LENR device. Thanks for bringing this to our attention!
GB
-
Hoverboards and hover-chevys by 2015?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uHgZhLUdxTE
-
The Space and Propulsion International Forum has filled up the house with people coming. I have completed a preview of my 30 minute talk. It is still a work in progress. A wmv movie file is linked below with the preview.
http://www.angelfire.com/scifi2/zpt/movies/ZNIDARSIC.wmv
I hope it goes well at the conference.
Frank Znidarsic
Hello fznidarsic, I made copies of your video and will study them carefully.
-
After going through all the videos and reading Lane Davis's paper "Quantum Cold Mysteries Resolved" I feel what is needed is a summary of Frank Z's cold fusion process.
So here is a rough first attempt. Feel free to make any additions, corrections etc.
During the quantum transition there is impedance matching between the electrostatic force and the electromagnetic force.
The electrostatic force occurs between the electron and proton and is expelled away from the proton at the speed of mechanical vibrations. This speed (mechanical vibrations) is 1.094 million metres per sec. Therefore the speed of transition is 1.094 million metres per sec.
Because of impedance matching during the quantum transition all the magnetic forces must be equal ie.. electromagnetic force = gravitomagnetic=spin orbit force.
This results in an increase in both the gravitomagnetic and spin orbit forces to match the electromagnetic force.
The increase in the spin orbit force has the effect of amplifying the strong force thus enabling the strong force to overcome the coulomb barrier and hence encouraging the fusion of two nuclei (cold fusion). Therefore for cold fusion to occur there must be continuous quantum transition, which is encouraged by stimulating the lattice at the speed of transition (1.094 million metres/sec)
-
@tomd000
I would agree, but you are using the wrong units. Replace 'million metres per sec' with 'megahertz per metre'.
If I remember correctly, from either the videos or Franks pre-talk summary he mentions a standing wave is measured in hertz per metre.
@anyone What is the most efficient method of vibrating something in the Megahertz range?
bourne
-
@bourne
Piezo's "may" work. See http://www.piezotechnologies.com/composites.htm
-
@Bourne
On page 5 of "Quantum Cold-Case Mysteries Revisited" the speed of transition is described as 1,093,846 m/s. Also see video 5.
Regarding the most efficient way of vibrating something in the Megahertz range. Would that be a laser?
-
Carbon nanotubes can contain molecular hydrogen H2. Metal hydrides can contain atomic hydrogen H1. For some reason, that I don't quite understand, cold fusion only works with atomic hydrogen.
Frank Z
-
Carbon nanotubes can contain molecular hydrogen H2. Metal hydrides can contain atomic hydrogen H1. For some reason, that I don't quite understand, cold fusion only works with atomic hydrogen.
Frank Z
According to the literature, the evidence points to the LENR's occuring at the surface of the materials and not in the bulk of the materials. Atomic hydrogen can externally bond to the cage of the fullerenes. This external bond to the surface of the fullerenes is where the LENR's are occuring. This reaction is found only in small pockets though, which I have a strong suspicion is due to trace amounts of fullerenes being present at the surface of the materials. I'm not sure why you think the atomic hydrogen has to be contained within the fullerenes cage. I wouldn't rule out H2 being contained inside the fullerenes while atomic hydrogen is externally bonded to the cage of the fullerenes. For now, lets concentrate on atomic hydrogen being externally bonded to the fullerenes cage.
Below is a few quotes I found in a publication titled, "Hydrogen-induced disintegration of fullerenes and nanotubes", http://www.pa.msu.edu/cmp/csc/eprint/DT200.pdf
Calculations at higher coverages suggest that after the first two atoms are adsorbed, additional hydrogens should preferentially adsorb along straight lines on the substrate. We believe that formation of this energetically preferred adsorption pattern can be achieved by surface diffusion of hydrogen atoms at temperatures found during many hydrogenation reactions since the activation barrier for sigmatropic rearrangement of chemisorbed hydrogen atoms is only ~1 eV. Even though there are no preferential adsorption sites on a carbon nanotube, atomic hydrogen is believed to adsorb preferentially along lines parallel to the axis of the outermost tube to release stress.
Molecular hydrogen does not dissociate on planar graphene, but does so with an energy gain on fullerenes, with the dissociated hydrogen pair preferentially binding on top of adjacent carbon atoms.
We found that the energy needed to break one bond is larger than the energy to break two adjacent bonds, shown in a dark color in the left panel of Fig. 2(c). Continuing this concerted bond breaking mechanism should cleave the edge, causing the structure to disintegrate
Consequently, the calculated transition paths for the disintegration of hydrogenated fullerenes and nanotubes represent the optimum cleavage path in unconstrained systems. Following an initial energy investment of 1.7 eV, the bonds break abruptly, leading to the final structure depicted in the right panel of Fig. 2(c). There is a net energy gain of ~2 eV associated with the bond breaking, caused by releasing the accumulated stress.
Our results indicate that the energy barrier to propagate the fracture decreases at successive steps. As a matter of fact, it may be reasonable to assume that the energy released following the initial step may activate the zipperlike cleavage at the crease without further energy investment. Once cleavage is initiated, the unzipping process transforms the stressed crease into two overlapping graphene edges in an exothermic reaction.
GB
-
I found this interesting video, explaining how the thrust from electrogravitic "lifters" is not JUST an ion propulsion effect, that there is also a electromagnetic and "gravitational" lift effect...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1-Yp_sY1n70
I am wondering if it is related somehow to the non-conservation of magnetic flux?
There is no limit to how fast space can expand or contract, just that the speed of light in vacuum is measured to be c, for any local region of space-time.
http://www.popsci.com/entertainment-amp-gaming/article/2009-05/warp-speed-possiblewe-ask-string-theorist?page=1
We physicists used to laugh at Star Trek's warp factor. We don't laugh anymore. About 10 years ago, a Mexican relativist named Miguel Alcubierre was watching Star Trek, and he came up with a new solution to Einstein's [general relativity] equation. The loophole is negative matter -- Einstein never considered it. And Alcubierre got a solution that looked very similar to warp drive.
The key is, you don't go to the stars, the stars come to you.
Everybody assumes you have to go to the stars, which means you have to break the light barrier and violate the laws of physics.
But you can compress the space like an accordion -- compress the space between you and the stars.
It's like a wrinkle in space. There are some objections to this, of course. We don't have negative matter, for instance. But in principle, if you have, let's say, a meteorite made of negative matter, then it may be possible.
Einstein never said that nothing can go faster than light.
Empty space can contract or expand faster than the speed of light. That's the Big Bang. It's emptiness that expanded. It looks very similar to the rendition of warp drive in the movies -- you would see distortion of star light, stars would come at you very fast, but inside you feel nothing.
-
I found this interesting video, explaining how the thrust from electrogravitic "lifters" is not JUST an ion propulsion effect, that there is also a electromagnetic and "gravitational" lift effect...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1-Yp_sY1n70
I am wondering if it is related somehow to the non-conservation of magnetic flux?
There is no limit to how fast space can expand or contract, just that the speed of light in vacuum is measured to be c, for any local region of space-time.
http://www.popsci.com/entertainment-amp-gaming/article/2009-05/warp-speed-possiblewe-ask-string-theorist?page=1
I'll describe a much better system than the lifter in which the ions themselves don't move the craft. A simple propulsion system used by UFO's within a planet's atmosphere is a vacuum system. They create a vacuum in the direction of travel. If there is low pressure on one side, the other side is subject to the full atmospheric pressure. With an atmospheric pressure of 1.033 kg. per sq. cm. we can calculate that the force operating on a saucer of 20 m. diameter is equal to 3,278,272.8 kg. This is one of the greatest forces available to us here on our planet, and we don't utilize it for our benefit, lol. It is a force provided by nature herself.
Cathode rays have the strange property of decomposing the atmosphere through which they pass. Under the action of these rays, the elements of the atmosphere revert to their etheric state. In addition to this, the cathode rays intersect the anode rays at an angle of 45 degrees. This is achieved by using high voltage and current. If they wish to go very fast, they use an absolute vacuum, and move through space in a flash. At other times, they use a semi-vacuum, and they will move more slowly. The intensity of the vacuum is proportional to the current used and is controlled by a rheostat. If they want to follow an undulating course, then they use a pulsing current. Outside the planet's atmosphere they use a different method. They manufacture an artificial ether similar to the planet in which they won't to travel to, and will travel through time-space instead of space-time. Traveling in time-space is equivilent to time-traveling in space-time. Time-space is space-time turned inside out and is a wormhole. Time-space is 3 dimensions of time and 1 dimension of space.
Now, lets get back to the lifter. Gassiot, in the middle of the nineteenth century, made the first unsuccessful attempts to pass electricity through rarefied gases. After him, Plucker invented the tube which was later used by Geissler for his experiments, from which the name "Geissler tubes" is derived. Other scientists of world fame, like Crookes, also carried out experiments with considerable success, which resulted in considerable progress in the field of physics.
In a Geissler tube the atmospheric pressure is reduced to between 1 and 3 mm. of mercury. If the tube contains air and the anode and cathode ends of it are put into contact with the positive and negative poles of a high tension electric current, the whole tube lights up with a violet light, with the exception of a space at the cathode end where the light is blue and separated from the remaining violet light by a dark band.
Various effects are brought about by changing the gas pressure inside the tube, such as the appearance of dark bands which are known as Faraday bands; the disintegration of gas molecules, liberating hydrogen; changes in the colour of the light to green, yellow, red, etc. Crookes succeeded in proving the mechanical action of cathode rays by bombarding rotary blades with them and setting them in motion. Similar experiments with spheres painted black produced the same result.
There was, however, one great difficulty which dogged the steps of science: cathode rays could not leave the tube of rarefied air since they were incapable of passing through any substance. The scientists asked themselves what effect cathode rays had on the ordinary atmosphere.
It was then that Lenard, Nobel prize winner in physics in 1905, working on Hertz' previous experiments, made an aluminium "window" on the opposite side to the cathode which projected the rays outside the tube where they could be studied with ease. He proved that these "Lenard rays" could be propagated in the atmosphere as easily as in the rarefied air of the tube, causing atmospheric phenomena of a similar nature. He proved that the passage of electrons through the dense air of the atmosphere appeared to open up a tunnel giving rise to strong ionization of the particles with considerable air turbulence and luminous effects which varied according to the voltage used.
However, he could not completely comprehend the nature of the phenomena as he did not know that they were the result of a disturbance in the atmosphere and ether. The most important thing as far as we are concerned, is to know whether or not ionization causes a drop in atmospheric pressure. It is now well known from meteorology that heavy ions cause low pressure, they often bring about devastating cyclones.
It is known that the emission of a single particle of medium velocity can produce in the first centimeter of its trajectory through the atmosphere as many as 24,400 ions. The number gradually increases as the particle proceeds along its trajectory. Even using a low voltage, the electrons moved through space at a speed of between 25,000 and 50,000 miles per second.
Later it was observed that by using 250,000 volts, the electrons moved at 150,000 miles per second. In one experiment 900,000 volts was used, but the speed of the electron was not noted. It is also well known that the higher the voltage used, the greater is the number of ions produced, sometimes as many as 2 million ions appearing in the first centimeter of the electron's trajectory.
Subsequent experiments showed that the electrons emanating from cathode ray tubes could break down the atmosphere and set free hydrogen which then also became ionized. It may well be that these rays break the atmosphere down completely, and set free the nuclei, which they subsequently join up with, thus producing the amount of hydrogen that has been observed.
Madame Curie was able to calculate the speed of ions as 1.3 cm. per electron volt in dense atmosphere, and 6.7 cm. per electron volt when the ionic movement took place in pure hydrogen. This shows that a high voltage would result in a higher electron speed and that in the upper atmosphere the speed would be greater. The vacuum creating effect is, however, not strictly due to the intrinsic speed of the ion, but to the atmosphere's ability to absorb ionized particles.
While negative ions are absorbed by the atmosphere, the positive ones move towards the negatively charged surface of the saucer, at which point the electrons pass into the vacuum. In an ordinary cathode ray tube the electric current reaches a saturation point which shows that all the atmospheric particles contained within the tube have been ionized. This is due to the limited amount of electrolyte within the confines of the tube. In the case of the flying saucer the electrolyte is made up of the whole atmospheric envelope of the Earth which never reaches saturation point. The ionized "bubble" surrounding the saucer is attracted and absorbed by the surrounding atmosphere with tremendous force and in its place only a vacuum is left, into which the saucer moves, impelled by the atmospheric pressure of 1.033 kg. per cm2
The lenard/cathode rays will escape through the outer aluminum layer of the cathode ray tube and will ionize the air. The cathode rays do not directly produce the vacuum. It is the ability of the surrounding medium to absorb the disassociated molecules after they are deformed or ionized by the cathode/lenard rays. The quicker the deformed molecules or ions are absorbed into the surrounding atmosphere, the greater the intensity of the vacuum; the greater the thrust available to the craft. The positive ions are attracted near the surface of the craft, and the negative ions are repelled away from the craft. The surrounding atmosphere then absorbs these displaced ions at an extremely fast rate which leaves behind a vacuum. Please note, this is not an ion propulsion system as most are led to believe for some strange reason. The ions themselves do not move the craft. They use what nature has freely given to them, which is the atmospheric pressure to create a potential to move their craft.
GB
-
Atmospheric pressure differential AKA lifter propulsion is interesting, yes. But that does not explain the apparent gravity altering effects of strong magnetism and extreme high voltage...
We should have flying cars by now.
Warp drive, where is our version of Zefram Cochrane to build the first warp drive?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zefram_Cochrane
There seems to be a working theory of gravity modification using high voltage fields and asymmetric capacitors. More research is required ;D
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ArKUGD294_k
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8HazOEqeae8
-
Atmospheric pressure differential AKA lifter propulsion is interesting, yes. But that does not explain the apparent gravity altering effects of strong magnetism and extreme high voltage...
We need to first define what gravity is. Gravity is a combination of phenomena and never an individualised force. 1.) Pressure. As a body cannot be subject to pressure in all directions, the Earth always shielding it from this pressure on one side, the body feels a difference in the forces acting upon it and falls to the surface of the Earth. 2.) Magnetism. The attraction that the vertical component of magnetism exerts on a body is, with small variations, the same as that on any other body. Thus it is that the speed of fall in a vacuum is constant. However, this attraction is not due to mass, it is caused by the magnetism with which the whole body is endowed. 3.) Temperature. You can prove that a magnet loses its properties on being heated. As matter is made up of stationary waves, heat has a powerful influence on them. By increasing the frequency of these waves they begin to give off light. Smoke from a cigar is heavier than the surrounding air, yet it rises as the result of warmth. That is to say the difference in density is compensated for by the temperature of the smoke. 4.) Density. We can see that a balloon full of hydrogen gas rises, according to the volume of the gas. That is to say, bodies of lesser density always tend to rise, in the same way that water and oil separate, due to density. Gravity does not prevent bodies of lesser density from rising. Whereas in air, which is of low density, heavy objects fall rapidly. In water, more dense than air, they fall more slowly. Moreover, it is well known that heat reduces the density of a body. We note that heat is a factor which affects gravity, not because it is itself an agent causing the phenomena of gravity, but because it influences magnetism and density. Pressure also influences density, thus it affects gravity.
GB
-
Atmospheric density variations provide aerodynamic lift and birds can fly... That is not actually a true gravity propulsion effect though ;D
A true gravity propulsion effect creates a free fall geodesic towards the direction of travel.
Then there are theories like this:
http://www.gettingtherefromhere.info/Community/Blog/tabid/79/EntryId/17/Discussion-of-SPESIF-Abstracts-Part-Four-Interstellar-Travel.aspx
FTL ( Faster Than Light ) Travel Using Tachyons, the GEM theory, and Causality
The space-time curvature around an object defines the mass it presents to the rest of the universe. It is predicted by the GEM theory that space-time curvature around a starship can be changed by properly configured and powerful electromagnetic fields. This will allow its inertial mass to be reduced to near zero, allowing rapid acceleration with electric thrusters. If this effect is intensified, then the inertial mass of the starship can be made imaginary and the starship will become a tachyon, moving faster than light. Tachyons are real and explain “Dark Energy†, the moving apart of the galaxies that is accelerating in time. This moving apart of the galaxies defines time-flow in the Cosmos . FTL travel using tachyons therefore, because it increases the tachyon density in the Cosmos , causes the galaxies to fly apart faster and thus causes the Cosmos to age faster. Thus, tachyonic FTL drive produces irreversible change in the Cosmos and does not violate causality.
-
Atmospheric density variations provide aerodynamic lift and birds can fly... That is not actually a true gravity propulsion effect though ;D
A true gravity propulsion effect creates a free fall geodesic towards the direction of travel.
FTL ( Faster Than Light ) Travel Using Tachyons, the GEM theory, and Causality
The space-time curvature around an object defines the mass it presents to the rest of the universe. It is predicted by the GEM theory that space-time curvature around a starship can be changed by properly configured and powerful electromagnetic fields. This will allow its inertial mass to be reduced to near zero, allowing rapid acceleration with electric thrusters. If this effect is intensified, then the inertial mass of the starship can be made imaginary and the starship will become a tachyon, moving faster than light. Tachyons are real and explain “Dark Energy†, the moving apart of the galaxies that is accelerating in time. This moving apart of the galaxies defines time-flow in the Cosmos . FTL travel using tachyons therefore, because it increases the tachyon density in the Cosmos , causes the galaxies to fly apart faster and thus causes the Cosmos to age faster. Thus, tachyonic FTL drive produces irreversible change in the Cosmos and does not violate causality.
Your view on gravity and the universe is much different than mine. Herschel and Newton mathematically proved the existence of our magnetic field, within which the Sun and the planets move, when they discovered that the point of equilibrium of the solar system lay at a distance from the Sun equal to three times its diameter, due to the proportion of 1 to 700 in the relative mass of the planets to that of the Sun. It is round this point of equilibrium that the Sun moves. While being attracted by this point, the earth is being repelled by the light from the Sun. It's orbit round the Sun represents the balance between these two actions of attraction and repulsion.
Now, a body in space can only be in a state of equilibrium if two contrary forces meet to support it. If there were only a force of attraction without a corresponding one of repulsion, the planet would move towards the point of attraction. If the repulsion were caused solely by centrifugal force, the planet would slowly spiral in, towards the source of attraction. Without the repulsive force of the Sun, there would, however, be no circular movement. There would be neither axial rotation nor orbital revolution. A body impelled in one direction only does not move in another direction. How could Earth move in orbit in a different direction to this repulsive force? Surely a thrust from one direction cannot give rise to another at right angles to itself?
If the magnetic centre lies between a planet and the Sun, the force of attraction is predominant and the planet is drawn in. However, if the Sun is between the planet and the centre, the force of repulsion predominates and the planet moves out, its path disturbed (this is why planets move in elliptical orbits). As the position of the Sun changes in relation to the "point zero" centre, each successive aphelion and perihelion of a planet occurs in a different position.
Nobody can equate problems without weighing all the factors which lead to their solution. Scientists forgot, when dealing with the movement of planets, that energy must have been used up as a result of solar attraction working against the two centrifugal forces mentioned. If no explanation was given as to the source of power necessary to sustain the movement, then it is because the problem was based on false premises. In the theory which I contend is the correct one, this force is derived from difference of energy potential which sunlight sets up by illuminating one face of the planet while leaving the other in darkness. A body which is balanced between two opposing forces (attraction and repulsion) has no weight and moves like a stone whirled round on the end of a string, the radius of its orbit being represented by the string.
There is an internal pressure which causes the nebulae to move away from one another. You may raise the objection that this pressure is also applied in the direction of flight so that the internal pressure coupled with the external one would make them stable and they would not move apart, which would cause their mass to condense. My answer to this would be that energy created outside a galaxy tends to be drawn into the galaxy, condensing itself into material form. Thus we have an internal pressure coupled with an external decompression.
The flight of the nebulae prevents condensation taking place for three reasons: 1) This movement causes the interior pressure to disappear. However, nebulae appear to maintain an acceleration caused by an internal pressure within the Universe. (2) As the nebulae move apart, that space which had been transformed into matter endeavours to return to its former state of primordial space in accordance with the law of rotation of masses in a magnetic field. This reconstitutes the energy that had been used for condensation of the matter, turning it into light, whose wave energy goes on decreasing until the moment of entropy is reached. This is what takes place on the Sun. Leaving aside the reaction that they bring about on the planets, the Sun's discharges into space are, in a sense, matter returning to its original state of primordial space. (3) Light repels magnetic fields. Light from a myriad of suns in the various galaxies produces a very great force of repulsion on all the nebulae, and under this pressure they move away from one another.
In the first instance God supplied the power that brings about the deformation of space and the Sun, by an opposite process, turns it back into energy, thus re-establishing the balance. That is why neither matter nor energy exist, but only deformed space, which is called matter, and what you call energy is nothing more than a phenomenon of transition between primordial space and deformed space.
GB
-
My modernize idea of J.J.Thomson's "plum pudding" electron model is the "twinkies". A golden yellow novelty cake with yellow icing on top and three nodes of cream goodness inside. The cellophane wrapper is 'Matter' ; the cake is represention of total electromagnetic power field. At center of the cake is white cream sphere. Had I design this part it would been a chocolate ring. The dark power exchanger; the "Schwarzschild radius" ,Bloch wall or Roden torus it is all the same. Next is two outside spheres push-pulling double duty electron pumps. Transferring Light power thru the ring and back. Giving the magnet its dynamic charge.
-
The atmosphere is not for to make birds to fly. In counterpart, birds have to overcome air pressure with they own wings. They-birds have to produce enough power not only to overcome gravity but also air withstand. Please see that people can also fly. And this without wings. On the Moon f.e. Don^t trust me?;-]
-
A video of Frank Znidarsic's lecture at the University of MD in March of 2011. Chief Scientists from NASA and the DOE were there.
http://www.angelfire.com/scifi2/zpt/movies/cofe_3_2011.wmv
-
DrStiffler at the energeticforum has made a possible link with the Spatial Self Resonate frequency of a coil when driven single ended to the quantum transitional speed of 1.094 MHz m/s, http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/3934-high-voltage-thin-air-71.html#post141994
DrStiffler's youtube channel, http://www.youtube.com/user/StifflerDr
*h20 this should also answer your question...
No upbeat as I'm not really back on this thread. I have become very passionate about the state of the union and put my two cents out on 'ricks' ruling class thread and the TSA threads. Anyway I look in as I post over there.
Now maybe I can answer so that you understand what I was saying. A coil has an 'srf', Spatial Self Resonate frequency when driven single ended, which is different from conventional 'SRF', Self Resonate Frequency. If you question this it is easily proven. Anyway say a particular coil has and 'srf' of 21MHz as found via the generator/scope measurement routine. This coil becomes L3 in a SEC Exciter. The Exciter is fully capable of producing the 21MHz and when doing so the output is what everyone is using to drive LED's, FL's and CFL's, along with other things. Now when a second coil is introduced with a minor coupling that has the same 21MHz 'srf' and conditions are right, a lock so to speak will take place where the two coils stop resonance at 21MHz and shift to a particular set of frequencies (example below). This set of frequencies are not harmonically or numerically related to the 21MHz. By using different coils that have a different initial 'srf', the lockup set of frequencies will also change and be totally at a different spot in the spectrum, except each different set will contain as a primary frequency, a frequency related to a harmonic of 1.094MHz.
Example: srf (2) coils ~ 21mHz +/-200KHz
Observed lockup set; 7,658,000
10,940,000
13,128,000
15,316,000
21,880,000
etc,etc.
The highest energy content is found at 7,658,00 in this set. Also note there are harmonics missing, (there are higher ones, just not shown). Now if you introduce AV Plugs on the coils and drive LED's a whole group of other frequencies are observed by the non-linear mixing in these semiconductors.
Now say we have a different coil and it has an 'srf' of say 18mHz. As per above we could see a resulting set from a two coil setup the say still could be extrapolated from 1.094, but be shifted up say 20MHz and the highest energy content being some other of the multiples of 1.094.
Did this help?
-
I greatly admire Frank for his courage to explain what we can see. Although he works in the Quantum field it is solely for the purpose of defining what effects matter or the real of the universe.
What I believe is that we have missed is what we can not see. The other half of the spectrum of matter and why it is there in the first place. The responsible party for keeping matter together. It would not be possible if this presence was not there in the first place. You could think of it as the "God" aspect. Totally unseen but is the true reason why life and matter exists. It is responsible for lights propagation and coincidently responsible for gravities pull on matter around great masses of matter. It is not Magnetism that does this and to tell you the truth from my perspective magnetism is a by product of this source.
If we delve into the makeup of our own planet we can see very complex actions going on. We can all agree that it is a very energetic place in our core. Lots of processes are going on at the same time. One of which is responsible for it all. A great attraction to a specific point in our mass we live on. This attraction binds our mass and even creates great flows to happen. This point has to be supported by matter ie anchored in space. Beyond that point everything moves twords it and it is what is creating our cores immense heat through the rubbing of the matter surrounding the central point. This process is ultimately seen in our sun. Thats the extreme example. When matter rubs against anything we can expect a few things to happen like heat and static. These are very well proven facts but it is the static aspect I have been concentrating because it has the effects of gravity that we are looking for. In the extremes we are talking about, in our core, both of these results have nurtured our planet to life. It has grown and continues to grow in all aspects including what we are seeing today.
This static potential of our inner core is growing beyond the ability of our planets mass to contain. It reaches out and is pulling more potential into itself, gaining faster then the mass of our planet can support or can equalize. This causes what we are seeing now with the increased energetic displays we are seeing in our atmosphere. This invisible force is the one true potential driving it all. Our planet is the perfect model to show this at this time.
If we look at the history of our planet we will see that others knew of this potential and even calculated when it's potential would over take the mass we are living on. Since the first thing I believe that man would discover would be statics it makes perfect sense to anyone I have talked to that this is the High Tech source that is shown to us by our own writings and even in the designs of huge structures around the world. Most are made with highly crystallized stone which has been shown to have static like properties when struck. These structures are merely passive conduits to draw off potential from the core and utilize it for mans use. In doing so we can balance the potential of our core and get an everlasting power source for man. Although the directions have been lost to time and the devices or structures have degraded it doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure the clues out.
Call me a kook or whatever you want but there is a reason the pyramids were built and it wasn't for it looks. There is plenty of discoveries about the pyramids to suggest that there is a link to the mass it sits on and the energy it is said to be emitting. This is because of the amplifying effect of the shape of this structure and the conduit of the matter it is made out of. If that wasn't enough proof then what about the place it was built on? The exact center of mass of our planet and enough stable foundation that goes further into our core then anywhere else. Somehow someone knew of this potential our our planet. They knew enough about stone to know that it transmits this potential and knew enough about geometry to know the shape of the stone could in fact amplify the base connection to draw out some of this charge our planet holds. The internal structure of the pyramid I believe is the controller aspect to this device. By creating blockages of charge it could control the flow of charge in the pyramid by using the same type of potential to create dams inside of the structure.
Ok enough about the Pyramids... So why do I think this related to Franks work. Well it can show the origins of matter. It would show how we can relate to matter and even how we can effect changes on it. Frank has shown some great thinking in the mechanics of matter on the smallest quanta and for that reason he should be commended but if we are to save our selves then we must understand the origins and the invisible aspect that is guiding matter and how we can fix the problem of our kind.
We must understand that Electricity and the theories that were made from that invention is not what is running matter outside of the electrical system. The electron doesn't exist outside of that invented system. It does exist inside that system because that is the way it was designed. Nature doesn't run off that system only mans invention does. Thats why we can not see the electron and never will. Nature runs off an entirely different system. A system that is under the Electrical one based off one half of the created electron system. A system that only includes potentials and the ability of matter to interact with those potentials when matter spans two points in space and creates a differential and hence movement or force between those two points. Density is a huge factor in the equation and that is where boundary conditions come in. Ie our layers in our atmosphere or water for that fact.
And this leads to what is causing our problem today. If we look at our atmosphere we can see that the extreme outer layer is very highly charged. This is due to the interaction between our suns output and our density change of our atmosphere between earth space and outer space. It is the skin of our planet system. This charge is based on surface area exposed to the suns emissions. Under normal conditions the outer layer would equal the inner potential but that would be the perfect system. Since the size of our planet is so massive the inner potential has added potential that is donated by the action of static pressures within our planet and conversions that matter is responsible for like heat and resulting flows from convection and expansion.
I guess that is enough for now. I sincerely apologize for this turning out to be a wall of text. I did not intend for that to happen. If this is way off topic I also apologize for that but I felt if we do not link franks work to the biggest examples and maybe show that we are still missing something then Franks good work would be for what then?
-
I bought a stungun that delivers 8 million volts,its rechargeable,you plug it into a wall socket.It weighs less than 4.5 ounces.With a few modications it could be a power source for a lifter.Cost me 26 dollars postage and handling included.triffid
-
If my memory serves me correctly, I believe Znidarsic doesn't know the exact mechanism for what causes the photons to be slowed down in the electronic structure of the atom in-order to match the speed of sound in the nucleus. I believe Frank Wilczek has the answer. Frank Wilczek is a Nobel Prize Winner and he is considered one of the world’s most eminent theoretical physicists. He is known, among other things, for the discovery of asymptotic freedom and the development of quantum chromodynamics (QCD). He's also an official advisor to CERN and to Daedalus. According to Wilczek and the standard model, photons inside superconductors are slowed-down and behave as particles with real mass.
How do we measure mass? The most familiar way is to use a scale. One sort of scale, the kind dieters have in their bathrooms, compares how much bodies (that is, dieters’ bodies) can compress a spring. Closely related are the scales that anglers use, which compare how much dangling bodies (that is, fish) stretch a spring. The amount the spring stretches (or, for the dieter, compresses) is proportional to the downward force the body exerts, which is what we call the body’s weight, which is proportional to its mass.
Using scales to compare masses is practical and effective, but it won’t do as a general, principled definition of mass. For example, if you take your body out into space, its weight as measured by a scale will get smaller, but its mass will stay the same. We can, however, compare masses in other ways. For example, we can compare how fast two cannonballs start to fly after you launch them out of the same cannon. According to Newton’s other laws of motion, a given impulse will give rise to a velocity inversely proportional to the mass. So if one cannonball comes out twice as fast as the other, it has half the mass—whether you do the experiment at the surface of Earth or in space. If the photons are slowed-down inside superconductors, then this highly suggests the photons have acquired real mass. So, during a quantum transition, a photon acquires real mass as it's being absorbed and loses it's real mass as it's being emitted. The same thing may happen with the W and Z particles during a quantum transition. The W and Z particles are much heavier, but the weak nuclear force is also much stronger at shorter distances. Since it's much stronger at shorter distances, then it may be able to carry the heavier W and Z particles at the same quantum transitional velocity of 1094000 m/s.
Below is a quote from Frank Wilczek in his book titled, "The Lightness of Being: Mass, Ether, and Unification of the Forces".
The model Nature gives us for making force-carrying particles heavy is superconductivity. For inside superconductors, photons become heavy! Here’s the essential idea. Photons are moving disturbances in electric and magnetic fields. In a superconductor, electrons respond vigorously to electric and magnetic fields. The electrons’ attempt to restore equilibrium is so vigorous that they exert a kind of drag on the fields’ motion. Instead of moving at the usual speed of light, therefore, inside a superconductor photons move more slowly. It’s as if they’ve acquired inertia. When you study the equations, you find that the slowed-down photons inside a superconductor obey the same equations of motion as would particles with real mass.
......
............
................
Cosmic Superconductivity: Electroweak Layer
The weak interaction is a short-range force. The fields responsible for this force, the W and Z, are similar in many ways to the electromagnetic field. The particles that arise as disturbances in these fields (the W and Z particles) resemble photons. Like photons, they are bosons. Like photons, they respond to charges—not electric charges to be sure, but what we’ve called green and purple charges, with similar physical properties. Their most obvious difference from photons is that W and Z are heavy particles. (Each weighs about as much as one hundred protons.)
Short-range force. Heavy particles. Sound familiar? It should. Those are exactly the properties of electromagnetic forces and photons inside superconductors. The modern theory of electroweak interactions is heavily invested in the analogy between what happens to photons inside superconductors and the observed properties of W and Z bosons in the cosmos. According to this part of the Core theory, the entity we perceive as empty space—the Grid—is a super conductor. Even though the conceptual and mathematical parallels run very deep, Grid superconductivity differs from conventional superconductivity in four main ways:
Occurrence: Conventional superconductivity requires special materials and low temperatures. Even the new “high temperature†superconductors max out at less than 200 Kelvin (room temperature is about 300 Kelvin). Grid superconductivity is everywhere, and has never been observed to break down. Theoretically, it should persist up to about 1016 Kelvin.
Scale: The photon mass inside a conventional superconductor is 10–11 proton masses, or less. The W and Z masses are about 102 proton masses.
What Flows: The super-currents of conventional superconductivity are flows of electric charge. They cause electromagnetic fields to become short range, and photons to acquire mass. The super-currents of Grid superconductivity are correlated flows of much less familiar types of charge: purple weak charge and hypercharge. W and Z fields can be generated by those flows, so the forces that W and Z generate become short-range, and the W and Z particles acquire mass.
....
........
Gravock
-
A quick note.
According to Frank Wilczek, mass is not conserved!
Gravock
-
The W and Z particles are much heavier, but the weak nuclear force is also much stronger at shorter distances. Since it's much stronger at shorter distances, then it may be able to carry the heavier W and Z particles at the same quantum transitional velocity of 1094000 m/s.
There's also a chance the W and Z particles may have a different transitional velocity than the photons. We won't know until the calculations are done. Is anybody up to this task? Maybe Rossi has the answer (If he does, then he's not telling).
Gravock
-
A quick note.
According to Frank Wilczek, mass is not conserved!
Gravock
At the Large Electron-Positron Collider (LEP), which operated at the CERN laboratory near Geneva through the 1990s, electrons and positrons (anti electrons) were accelerated to velocities within about one part in a hundred billionth of the speed of light. Speeding around in opposite directions, the particles smashed into each other, producing a lot of debris. A typical collision might produce ten π mesons, a proton, and an anti-proton. Now let’s compare the total masses, before and after:
electron + positron: 2 × 10^–28 gram
10 pions + proton + anti-proton: 6 × 10^–24 gram
What comes out weighs about thirty thousand times as much as what went in. If mass is not conserved—and it’s not!, then we can seek its origin.
Question: If E = mc^2, then mass is proportional to energy. So if energy is conserved, doesn’t that mean that mass will be conserved, too?
Answer: The short answer is that E = mc^2 really applies only to isolated bodies at rest. It’s a pity that this equation, the equation of physics that is best known to the general public, is actually a little cheesy. In general, when you have moving bodies, or interacting bodies, energy and mass aren’t proportional. E = mc^2 simply doesn’t apply. E = mc^2 holds for isolated bodies at rest. For moving bodies, the correct mass-energy equation is given in the image below, where v is the velocity. For a body at rest (v = 0), this becomes E = mc^2. When a body, for example, a proton or an electron, is accelerated, v generally changes, but m stays the same. Therefore, the equation tells us, E changes. If energy is conserved, but mass is not, then what gives?
Conservation of energy applies to systems, not to individual bodies. The total energy of a system of bodies includes contributions from both energy of motion and “potential energy†terms that reflect the interactions among the bodies. The potential energy terms are given by other formulas, which depend on the distances between the bodies, their electric charges, and perhaps other things. It is only the total energy that is conserved.
An isolated body has a constant velocity. That’s Newton’s first law of motion, which, unlike his zeroth law, still appears to be valid. When a body is isolated, we can regard it as a system unto itself. So the energy of the body should be conserved and from the formula, it is. Conversely, when a body’s velocity changes, that very change is a signal that the body is not isolated. Some other body has to be acting on it to produce the change in velocity. The action of one body on another generally transfers energy between them. Only the total energy is conserved, not the energy of each body separately.
We considered a dramatic violation of conservation of mass. An electron and a positron annihilate, and out come a collection of particles whose total mass is 30,000 times larger. Nevertheless, energy is conserved. The velocities of the initial electron and positron were very close to the speed of light. Therefore, according to the general mass-energy equation, their energy is very large, much larger than mc^2. The particles that emerge from the collision, although they are more massive, move a bit more slowly. When you add up their energies, calculated using the mass-energy equation, the sum matches the total energy of the original electron and positron. Once the particles fly out and separate, the interaction, or potential, energy becomes negligibly small.
Gravock
-
DrStiffler at the energeticforum has made a possible link with the Spatial Self Resonate frequency of a coil when driven single ended to the quantum transitional speed of 1.094 MHz m/s, http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/3934-high-voltage-thin-air-71.html#post141994 (http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/3934-high-voltage-thin-air-71.html#post141994)
DrStiffler's youtube channel, http://www.youtube.com/user/StifflerDr (http://www.youtube.com/user/StifflerDr)
1094000 m/s is 3.139... times the Aether's linear velocity of 348422.9 m/s. This is so very close to pi = 3.14... The Aether's linear velocity is computed by Ioannis Xydous in his publication titled, "The secret of the Electron-Positron pair v2.0 (http://www.ioannisxydous.gr/SEPPv2.pdf)". If I had a choice between reading Wilczek's paper or Xydous's paper I would definitely choose to read the publication by Xydous. In fact, IMO, Xydous's paper is a true masterpiece.
According to Xydous, there is a reduction in the E/M wave's velocity when it enters into an Electrostatic Field. This is in agreement with Wilczek's claims with photons being slowed-down inside a superconductor, and is also in agreement with Znidarsic's work when the speed of light is slowed down in the electronic structure of the atom to match the speed of mechanical waves in the nucleus. When the photon leaves the Electrostatic Field it can travel at normal constant speed equal to c in a vacuum, but with decreased momentum which corresponds to the decrement of its frequency.
Also, according to Xydous, the Cold Dark matter is nothing else than the Aether itself with linear velocity of 348422.9 m/s, which is about 861 times less than the speed of light or equal to 1000 times the sound velocity in air. Xydous also talks about 0 momentum and velocity. I hope Dr. Stiffler is listening. It wouldn't surprise me if he's familiar with Xydous's work. Xydous computes almost everything you could possibly imagine in a single paper. Mind-blowing and mind-boggling stuff.
Gravock
-
According to Xydous, there is a reduction in the E/M wave's velocity when it enters into an Electrostatic Field............When the photon leaves the Electrostatic Field it can travel at normal constant speed equal to c in a vacuum, but with decreased momentum which corresponds to the decrement of its frequency.
Please read the above quote, which is a quick summary of my previous post. Reading the quick summary will help in understanding why I'm asking the following 3 questions in regards to Dr. Stiffler's SEC. Dr. Stiffler is no longer active at the energeticforum, but is currently active at Heretical Builders (http://www.hereticalbuilders.com/showpost.php?p=7858&postcount=624).
If we had an oscillating Electrostatic field varying in strength and/or distance, wouldn't we be able to generate a broadband of frequencies? And wouldn't all of the different frequencies generated have a different momentum which would correspond to different energy levels? Also, doesn't this make it easier to see the relationship between velocity and frequency in regards to Znidarsic's transitional velocity of 1094000 m/s showing up as multiples of 1094000 hertz (1.094 Mhz)?
IMO, the answer to those 3 questions would be Yes, Yes, and Yes!
Gravock
-
I just published two books. Take a peak.
http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=ntt_athr_dp_sr_1?_encoding=UTF8&sort=relevancerank&search-alias=books&ie=UTF8&field-author=Frank%20Znidarsic (http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=ntt_athr_dp_sr_1?_encoding=UTF8&sort=relevancerank&search-alias=books&ie=UTF8&field-author=Frank%20Znidarsic)
Frank Znidarsic