Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011  (Read 741135 times)

Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1740 on: July 01, 2011, 10:50:04 AM »

... however you want to dress it up and twist everything the fact remains that despite many people trying to reproduce your circuit none of them can match your results,
WHO EXACTLY?  Where do you find anyone trying to reproduce our circuit?  THERE IS NO-ONE.  There has been NO-ONE.  For NO-ONE read NONE.  Zilch.  Nada.  NOTHING.  SO?  Who exactly are you saying has TRIED TO MATCH OUR RESULTS? 

and you do nothing to help them,
WHO?  WHO HAVE I REFUSED TO HELP?  WHERE ARE THEY?  WHO ARE YOU REFERRING TO?  BE SPECIFIC.  There has been NO-ONE.  For NO-ONE read NONE.  Zilch.  Nada.  NOTHING.  SO.  Who exactly are you saying that I refused to help?

and if they question why it is not working you generally attacked them,
WHO HAS QUESTIONED why it is not working?  BE SPECIFIC.  There has been NO-ONE.  For NO-ONE read NONE.  Zilch.  Nada.  NOTHING.   Who exactly are you saying is questioning why this circuit is not working?

you keep coming up with arguments that have already been covered in previous posts...
Because you keep coming up with the same counter argument. 

there is not one person on this forum who believes your circuit will produce any excess energy,
THIS IS ALSO NOT TRUE.  There are two members of this forum who are collaborators on that paper.  They NOT ONLY believe the circuit results but are RESPONSIBLE FOR PRODUCING THEM.

and that is why your supporters can't make the circuit.
WHAT supporters can't make this circuit?  Would there not first be the requirement to TRY?  To the best of my knowledge there have been no attempts.  NONE.  Zilch.  Nada.  NOTHING.  SO.  Who exactly are you saying can't make this circuit?  Again.  BE SPECIFIC.

you have a good political way of getting your message across, but when most people look at the reality of the history of your circuit on this forum and you're refusal to do any new test.
it is clear to most of them that you are just using this forum for grandstanding and publicity.
Well.  If I have a good political way of getting my message across it seems to be ELUDING you.  Therefore exactly how good can it be?  THE REALITY OF THE HISTORY OF MY CIRCUIT ON THIS FORUM IS THAT IT WORKS.  I have NEVER refused to do any new test.  AND IF THIS IS GRANDSTANDING - then God help us all.  I would have said it's an effort to keep the EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE ALIVE AND WELL IN THE FACE OF AN UNDESERVED AND UNQUALIFIED ATTACK.  And I'm reasonably certain that IF this generates any kind of publicity then it is ENTIRELY the wrong  kind.

Rosemary

Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1741 on: July 01, 2011, 11:16:25 AM »
I ENTIRELY MISSED THIS PIECE OF NONSENSE.

Hi Bill

The main problem here is that Rosie keeps insisting that her circuit produces excess energy, many members on this forum replicated that circuit failed to get any excess energy, if they complain about the circuit not working properly Rosie generally attacks them.

If you are going to claim excess energy on this forum you are expected to interact with reasonable requests for new tests, I think that it's only reasonable when making such claims.

there are plenty of people out there claiming they have got a free energy circuit if we invited them all on here, and told them that they didn't have to interact with anyone who made requests for them to prove their case, this forum would lose all credibility.

Yes Rosie's work is very interesting and can be considered good research material,are but her attitude to members here that make reasonable requests or suggest that her circuit might not work,is appalling

I think you know Luke's work (gotoluc) very well like by most of us, he is such a polite person he generally does not look to argue with anybody, and yes he failed to make Rosie's circuit produce any excess energy

LUKE HAS NOT TRIED TO REPLICATE THIS CIRCUIT.  NO FORUM MEMBER THAT I KNOW OF HAS TRIED TO REPLICATE THIS CIRCUIT OTHER THAN THE TWO WHO ARE ALSO MEMBERS OF OUR TEAM.  NOTA BENE CAT.  THEY NEITHER OF THEM POST HERE.  CAN YOU GUESS WHY?  SO.  AGAIN.  WHEN EXACTLY DID LUKE TRY AND TEST THIS CIRCUIT?  CAN YOU EVEN GET HALF WAY TO THE TRUTH?  JUST NOW AND AGAIN?

Rosemary

powercat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1091
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1742 on: July 01, 2011, 03:44:45 PM »
I ENTIRELY MISSED THIS PIECE OF NONSENSE.

LUKE HAS NOT TRIED TO REPLICATE THIS CIRCUIT.  NO FORUM MEMBER THAT I KNOW OF HAS TRIED TO REPLICATE THIS CIRCUIT OTHER THAN THE TWO WHO ARE ALSO MEMBERS OF OUR TEAM.  NOTA BENE CAT.  THEY NEITHER OF THEM POST HERE.  CAN YOU GUESS WHY?  SO.  AGAIN.  WHEN EXACTLY DID LUKE TRY AND TEST THIS CIRCUIT?  CAN YOU EVEN GET HALF WAY TO THE TRUTH?  JUST NOW AND AGAIN?

Rosemary

CAN YOU EVEN GET HALF WAY TO THE TRUTH?  JUST NOW AND AGAIN?
This is the first time I have mentioned Luke and like all the other times, you have suggested I might be wrong, I go back and check, and you are correct Luke has not reproduced your circuit, his name came up in a YouTube search of all the people that have experimented with your circuit, that is where I made my mistake,
so I apologise in if I have misled anybody it was a genuine mistake, and I withdraw the statement.

I do not lie about people like Rosie would have you all believe, I do occasionally make mistakes and when I do,I make all efforts to put things right as soon as possible.

powercat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1091
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1743 on: July 01, 2011, 04:31:08 PM »
Quote from: Rosemary Ainslie on June 25, 2011, 03:27:38 AM
And yet again you fail to read the evidence.  Here's that link again.  If this does NOT constitute a replication then BY RIGHTS it needs must be withdrawn.  As of NOW it is NOT withdrawn.  This is published by Fuzzy on his own Scribd file.  EXPLAIN THAT if you can.  To the best of my knowledge Fuzzy is a forum member.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/23455916/Open-Source-Evaluation-of-Power-Transients-Generated-.


Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1744 on: July 01, 2011, 04:38:38 PM »
CAN YOU EVEN GET HALF WAY TO THE TRUTH?  JUST NOW AND AGAIN?
This is the first time I have mentioned Luke and like all the other times, you have suggested I might be wrong, I go back and check, and you are correct Luke has not reproduced your circuit, his name came up in a YouTube search of all the people that have experimented with your circuit, that is where I made my mistake, so I apologise in if I have misled anybody it was a genuine mistake, and I withdraw the statement.

I do not lie about people like Rosie would have you all believe, I do occasionally make mistakes and when I do,I make all efforts to put things right as soon as possible.

YOU ARE STILL WRONG.  I DO NOT KNOW IF IT'S A GENUINE MISTAKE OR BECAUSE YOU NEVER READ MY POSTS.  AGAIN. NO-ONE HAS REPLICATED THIS CIRCUIT.  FUZZY TOM CAT DID NOT REPLICATE THIS CIRCUIT.  NO-ONE HAS REPLICATED THIS CIRCUIT.  CERTAINLY NOT ANYONE WHO HAS POSTED ON THIS FORUM.  HOW MANY MORE WAYS MUST I SAY THIS.  YOU ARE LYING EVERY SINGLE TIME YOU SAY THAT SOMEONE HAS REPLICATED THIS CIRCUIT.  JUST AS YOU LIE EVERY TIME YOU SAY I REFUSE TO DO THOSE TESTS THAT YOU DEMAND.  JUST LIKE YOU LIE EVERY TIME YOU SAY THAT I DO NOT HELP PEOPLE WHO TRY TO REPLICATE THIS CIRCUIT.  EVERY SINGLE PRESENTATION THAT YOU MAKE IS A LIE.  SO.  DON'T SAY YOU DON'T LIE.  THAT'S ALL YOU DO.

THERE HAVE ONLY BEEN REPLICATIONS OF OUR PREVIOUS CIRCUIT. 

GOD.  WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU?


Rosemary

powercat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1091
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1745 on: July 01, 2011, 04:44:43 PM »



THERE HAVE BEEN REPLICATIONS OF OUR PREVIOUS CIRCUIT. 

Rosemary


 :o  :o  :o  :o  :o  :o Now we're getting somewhere, and they all failed to achieve your results of excess energy.

Are you finally admitting that your PREVIOUS CIRCUIT didn't work as you claim, you had no excess energy at all.
? ? ? ?

Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1746 on: July 01, 2011, 04:53:19 PM »

 :o  :o  :o  :o  :o  :o Now we're getting somewhere, and they all failed to achieve your results of excess energy

WRONG AGAIN.  THERE HAVE BEEN MANY REPLICATIONS.  THE MOST SIGNIFICANT IS THE ONE THAT FUZZY TOM CAT MANAGED.  BUT HE CLAIMED that it was ACTUALLY HIS DISCOVERY  :o  NOT A REPLICATION AT ALL.

None of us EVEN CONSIDER THAT ANY VARIATION OF THIS CIRCUIT CONSTITUTES A DISCOVERY.  THEN WHEN HIS PUBLIC LOST ALL THEIR CREDIBILITY HE THEN TRIED SOMETHING NEW.  HE THEN  RAN A WHOLE LOT OF TESTS THAT WERE DESIGNED TO FAIL.  THEN HE WITHDREW THE RESULTS THAT SHOWED THAT IT WORKED.  BUT.  HE HAS STILL LEFT OUR PAPER SHOWING A FULL REPLICATION ON HIS SCRIBD FILE.  SO.  WE NONE OF US KNOW WHAT THE HELL HE IS CLAIMING.  NOR DO I CARE.  THAT CIRCUIT IS NOW SO OLD HAT THAT IT'S ALREADY OBSOLETE.  THIS NEW CIRCUIT IS WAY, WAY MORE EFFECTIVE.

Rosemary

Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1747 on: July 01, 2011, 05:02:58 PM »

Are you finally admitting that your PREVIOUS CIRCUIT didn't work as you claim, you had no excess energy at all.
? ? ? ?

And as for this little editorial nightmare.  Are you entirely bereft of good sense or is it just that you lack any kind of MORALITY.  WHERE - have I EVER said that the PREVIOUS CIRCUIT DID NOT WORK AS WE CLAIMED? WHERE have I even HINTED at this.  IS THIS ANOTHER ONE OF YOUR ELABORATE FABRICATIONS?  HOW STRANGE.   :o Especially coming from someone who claims he does not LIE.  Where's that ability of yours to PUT THE RECORD STRAIGHT.  HAS IT FAILED YOU CAT?  I'd say so.  In fact I'd say it's a CATASTROPHIC FAILURE.

Rosemary 

Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1748 on: July 01, 2011, 05:18:55 PM »
Well?  We're all waiting CAT.  ADVISE US PLEASE.  LET'S GET SOME ACTUAL TRUTHS OUT IN THIS TJHREAD - JUST FOR ONCE.  LET'S SEE IF YOU'RE ACTUALLY EQUAL TO THE RETRACTION THAT YOU CLAIM COMES TO YOU SO EASILY - BECAUSE YOU'RE SUCH AN UPRIGHT FELLOW.

You have been indulging in certain rather elaborate CLAIMS.  We're all waiting to see you SUBSTANTIATE THOSE CLAIMS.  I hope you realise that it actually matters.  Otherwise our members may be left with the ERRONEOUS impression that our claims are FALSE.  AND THAT WOULD BE SAD.  Especially since of all things - there is NOTHING more challenging that promoting THIS NEW SCIENCE.  IT NEEDS NURTURING.  IT CAN DO WITHOUT THIS ASSASSINATION THAT YOU'VE BEEN ORCHESTRATING.

Rosemary

Magluvin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5884
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1749 on: July 01, 2011, 06:32:54 PM »
Did I say that she owes me anything? Treat my Mother this way, yeah right. My Mother is open minded and not delusional.

I just asked her to do a simple test. I don't know what you mean by she took something from me.
Well, first off, I asked her to do a simple test to prove her circuit. She is the one who is unproductive. Ask her what she has done in the last 10 years to improve her circuit so that it could be used. Yes, you are right. It is very amusing. She thinks she knows more then a lot of people here that have tried to set her straight.
Golly, I hope nobody is cheering me on. I have no credibility when it comes to what? I never claimed to have anything. She is the one who is making the claims that has nothing. No, I come here to see if she has finally come to her senses.

Get a clue dude.

Oooo   get a clue.  I got one.  You need to get a few transistors and a FEW other parts and a heater and test it yourself..  What? No time for that, due to all this ranting?  Yeah   I got it.

Yeah  I have a clue. Hope you guys are getting paid well for all this. Thats what its really all about. Theres your clue.

As for me, I work on this stuff. I have over 80 vids on YT and that no. would increase exponentially if I had recorded every thing.

Im not really going to waste any more time on your lazyness and crying cuz momma wont give you the candy. Lazy.  Build it if not.  What? Its a waste of YOUR time?
Yeh, right.  Oh  I almost forgot, your probably not going to get paid to build it.

So go have some Whaa burgers and some Frenchcries, and you can wash it down with a Whinekin.   :-*

Hey Rose. ;]

Just ignore them. They will go away. You have more important things to do.  ;]

Mags 


Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1750 on: July 01, 2011, 06:46:35 PM »
Hi Magsy.  You're right.  I need to get back to that paper.  But it's a difficult one.  Truth is I'm rather too glad to get distracted.  But.  NO MORE.  BACK TO THE GRINDSTONE.

I think we've sort of called CAT's bluff.  I don't think MaNag's paid to distract.  It's a natural talent.  Cat's another story.  Just not sure there.

Cat said 'Enough is enough
I've decided to get really tough
On a dame with a name
For an outrageous claim'.
But the tough was all blunder and bluff.

LOL.
Rosie

MrMag

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 754
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1751 on: July 01, 2011, 07:23:30 PM »
Oooo   get a clue.  I got one.  You need to get a few transistors and a FEW other parts and a heater and test it yourself..  What? No time for that, due to all this ranting?  Yeah   I got it.

Yeah  I have a clue. Hope you guys are getting paid well for all this. Thats what its really all about. Theres your clue.

As for me, I work on this stuff. I have over 80 vids on YT and that no. would increase exponentially if I had recorded every thing.

You mean MOSFET's? I don't have the expensive scope and probes required to see this alleged gigantic COP>infinity and OU. I wish I got paid to bring frauds out into the public. Really, 80 vids. So does IST, and this means what? You just don't understand. I've been playing with electronics for many years. What you may think is a interesting result that should be posted on youtube, I don't think it's that big of a deal. Most people that do not have a background or experience in electronics get pretty excited over menial things.

Im not really going to waste any more time on your lazyness and crying cuz momma wont give you the candy. Lazy.  Build it if not.  What? Its a waste of YOUR time?
Yeh, right.  Oh  I almost forgot, your probably not going to get paid to build it.

So go have some Whaa burgers and some Frenchcries, and you can wash it down with a Whinekin.   :-*

Hey Rose. ;]

Just ignore them. They will go away. You have more important things to do.  ;]

Mags

Good bye Magluvin, rose has already apologized to me so no need for me to continue here. Anyone with any intelligence at all can see the truth and I'll leave it at that.

powercat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1091
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1752 on: July 01, 2011, 07:32:48 PM »
You really are a politician you twist everything that is said, you do anything to distract from the main point, you have more spin than a washing machine,

Can you tell me which person here has reproduced your circuit and achieved excess energy please show me their post for which ever circuit this one or the previous one, that has been shown on this forum to produce excess energy,

fuzzytomcat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 676
    • Open Source Research and Development
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1753 on: July 01, 2011, 07:34:54 PM »
WRONG AGAIN.  THERE HAVE BEEN MANY REPLICATIONS.  THE MOST SIGNIFICANT IS THE ONE THAT FUZZY TOM CAT MANAGED.  BUT HE CLAIMED that it was ACTUALLY HIS DISCOVERY  :o  NOT A REPLICATION AT ALL.

None of us EVEN CONSIDER THAT ANY VARIATION OF THIS CIRCUIT CONSTITUTES A DISCOVERY.  THEN WHEN HIS PUBLIC LOST ALL THEIR CREDIBILITY HE THEN TRIED SOMETHING NEW.  HE THEN  RAN A WHOLE LOT OF TESTS THAT WERE DESIGNED TO FAIL.  THEN HE WITHDREW THE RESULTS THAT SHOWED THAT IT WORKED.  BUT.  HE HAS STILL LEFT OUR PAPER SHOWING A FULL REPLICATION ON HIS SCRIBD FILE.  SO.  WE NONE OF US KNOW WHAT THE HELL HE IS CLAIMING.  NOR DO I CARE.  THAT CIRCUIT IS NOW SO OLD HAT THAT IT'S ALREADY OBSOLETE.  THIS NEW CIRCUIT IS WAY, WAY MORE EFFECTIVE.

Rosemary

Rosemary your a lying sack of dog do do .....

1) If I actually did a scientific replication of your DEVICE I demand you show proof of your bogus claim of your device including any and all device photos , images and data files of the replication, as you stated in many postings on many forums that you have all this in your possession and refuse to show to anyone in the open source community.

2) I have never claimed your piece of junk as a discovery of mine ..... as I stated in many posts in many forums "SHOW PROOF" of a link in a posting or anything where I claimed this .... you cheep excuse for a liar 

3) So I did testing to throw the results off .... you better have proof of this you ..... I'm sick of your lies and so is everyone else.

4) The scribid file is a optional electronic preprint that was released prior to the submitting of the paper to IEEE and is "NOT THE SAME CONTENT, TEXT OR FORMAT AS THE FIVE TIME REJECTED SUBMITTAL"


May I remind everyone ( ROSEMARY ) again ...... and again .... what is a replication !!!!!!!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Replication_%28scientific_method%29
Reproducibility is the ability of a experiment or study to be accurately reproduced, or replicated, by someone else working independently. It is one of the main principles of the scientific method.

The results of an experiment performed by a particular researcher or group of researchers are generally evaluated by other independent researchers who repeat the same experiment themselves, based on the original experimental description (see independent review). Then they see if their experiment gives similar results to those reported by the original group.



http://rosemaryainslie-publicblog.blogspot.com/

Magluvin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5884
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1754 on: July 01, 2011, 10:35:47 PM »
You mean MOSFET's? I don't have the expensive scope and probes required to see this alleged gigantic COP>infinity and OU. I wish I got paid to bring frauds out into the public. Really, 80 vids. So does IST, and this means what? You just don't understand. I've been playing with electronics for many years. What you may think is a interesting result that should be posted on youtube, I don't think it's that big of a deal. Most people that do not have a background or experience in electronics get pretty excited over menial things.

Good bye Magluvin, rose has already apologized to me so no need for me to continue here. Anyone with any intelligence at all can see the truth and I'll leave it at that.

An expensive scope?  I thought all you needed to see was the batteries charging while the circuit was running.
Is that not what you have been asking of Rose?

Rose apologized to you?  Where, here in her last post before my last post??? 

"I don't think MaNag's paid to distract.  It's a natural talent.  Cat's another story.  Just not sure there."

Well, ok.  I suppose ill have to accept that from you.

One down Rose.  ;]  Think you can handle the 's and the "not quite human yet" guy?   ;]

Mags