Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: INKOMP-technology Valeri Ivanov (Bulgaria) as an element in electric car  (Read 14213 times)

Delta_V

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 4
SUMMARY:
The purpose of this demonstration is to show the capabilities of this module in its application in electric vehicles.
Most importantly, its application is not tied to structural changes in electric vehicles. This module is put in place one of batteries or any specially designated place for it. Structural changes in the electric does not require. It is compatible with any vehicle using the power of engines.
Another is that using this module, the distance from the electric vehicles increases two, three or more times, depending on materials used in the module.
Let us see in our case what we received. The output of the module will receive a 12.5 to 13.5VDC. As we have three lamps 12V/50W connected in series. Or in the case load will be about 30W. At the same time and measure current flowing from the battery through the test lead working in the frequency range from zero to 100 KHz. We measure the effective voltage that is fed into the module and thus determine the power inlet module. Will measure and determine and output power module. You'll find quite a sensitive difference between the two, the relationship between power output and that of the entrance. Both digital multimeter will be shown the values of the currents at the entrance and exit.
Turn on the system. The generator of control pulses the pulse duration 760 mks and repetition rate 33Hz.
We note the importance of effective input current, which is 2.5A.
100 mV readings to meet at 1A.
Effective voltage input, read from the oscilloscope is 2.15V.
These are effective values of voltage and current through which we carry out the management of processes in the module.
On the second digital multimeter output current of 2.3A and voltage read on the oscilloscope is 13.7 VDC.
As calculate capacity receive input power 5.37W, and output power of 31.5W.
You see what a huge difference we output power compared to the entrance. In this case the ratio is 5.87!
Or power, used to manage processes in the module is approximately six times less than what the output!
Note that battery power is used to manage the process which occurs in the module. Energy that the output resulting from the use of other external source of power rather than battery power!
So, in our case, assuming elktromobil these batteries have traveled 150 km, then use the module, we increased his mileage at least four times - he would have traveled at least 600 km on a single battery charge.
I note that the work of this module is based on the method "Integrated switching of magnetic flows” ( INKOMP), which is the subject of my patent of 2006, and the module itself was patented in 2009.
An important feature of the module is that it can be placed on any vehicle, regardless of the environment in which it is used - in water, underwater, on land, air, space ... In the module itself has no electronic components. Electronic components only in the generator of control pulses in the rectifier, if there is a need.
No moving mechanisms, making it resistant to wear

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XpxMp8fw7j0

Nali2001

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 396
Hello Delta_V (Mister Ivanov?)

Thanks for the video and the explanation.
Have you already found some kind of business agreement for the technology? Any plans when it will be commercially available?

Is there a website where we can see your 2009 patent?
Are you willing to give some info about the workings of the device? Maybe some info for the home experimenter to build and test the basic concept? This is an experimenters site after all.

Thanks!
Steven


Delta_V

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 4
Yes, I am Valery Ivanov :)
Currently negotiating with two companies that manufacture photovoltaic systems. In the process of negotiation and I to participate in a project for electric cars. Interest is really high. Especially in light of recent events in the world. I think the most appropriate will be applied first in transport. Changes in the design of electric cars is not necessary.
Unfortunately, delayed production of modules. Not my fault. Hate to say it, but in the last 2-3 years the interest manifested only people with bad intentions who want to abuse. They were not real businessmen and people of good luck. Adventurers who wanted to earn money by dishonest means

gyulasun

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4117
Hi Valery,

Thanks for showing your videos, very interesting.  I believe it is a good idea to choose the electric car example as one possible application area for your modul: sooner or later you will surely find a correct investor because combustion engine cars are to be hybridized with electric drives too, electric engines are the next step in auto industry.

I would also like to read your patent of 2009.
Is it in Bulgarian only? If yes, could you share the Bulgarian text so that computer translation could be done to English (or other) language?

I would like to know what COP (coefficience of performance= Pout/Pin) is inherent in your "Integrated switching of magnetic flows” ( INKOMP) principle?  You have measured a COP=31.5W/5.37W=5.87  which is very very respectful. Flux switching is capable of yielding higher COP too?

Thanks,
Gyula

kampen

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 132

Dear Mr. Valeri Ivanov, this is absolutely fantastic !!

So what's next......after all shall we wait another couple of years??

The reason for my comment is to know if you will be providing the specs on this through Open Source GNU.
Because if you do that, you won't be harassed by anyone and you will help rid our world of these money hungry power companies and help save the environment also.
 
With Open Source GNU you can copyright your design and still make money from it, most probably more than you would if you patented it because once the Chinese get their hands on it, your patent would be worth nothing because they will copy it and you can't do anything about it.

Please consider to post the specifications, always under the open source GNU, that way people will purchase the parts of you if they want to build it themselves and will be able to verify it 100% if it works or not.
 
The government can't stop it once it goes to GNU because millions will know the design and can verify it. 

Please post here your thoughts on this as its extremely important...
Your invention is incredibly important NOW.!!

mscoffman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1377
Yes, I am Valery Ivanov :)
Currently negotiating with two companies that manufacture photovoltaic systems. In the process of negotiation and I to participate in a project for electric cars. Interest is really high. Especially in light of recent events in the world. I think the most appropriate will be applied first in transport. Changes in the design of electric cars is not necessary.
Unfortunately, delayed production of modules. Not my fault. Hate to say it, but in the last 2-3 years the interest manifested only people with bad intentions who want to abuse. They were not real businessmen and people of good luck. Adventurers who wanted to earn money by dishonest means

Too bad about the delay in the module production. But I disagree with your next statement
It isn't that *they* are not honest business people, it that you are a standard inventor
dreamer type and not a very good business person. You continue to let your dreams
take you down a path that leads to control of your product by folks that already own
designs of competitive product. You need to develop a way to compete against them
and take their profit away, you cannot sell them on your device.

For example let say we have just invented fire. How do we productize fire?
Well why wouldn't we go into our kitchen and build a pack of matches and the go
out to the street corner and sell these for a profit, skip the extra cost for the magic
of new means of producing a fire.? No, when you invent fire you theorize a way to use fire
to propel yourself to the moon, and then plan on productizing fire that way. You will never
accomplish your goal. And in the process you will suppress and make sure that nobody in
society benefits from your discovery.

In short don't put anything in a vehicle, but simply build a device to supply energy
with a fixed specification and manufacture them in your kitchen if you have to
and sell them for a profit.

You see the energy field does not need new and competitive *ideas* it need competitive
*product*. Always keeping things in competitive idea form is a MIB control strategy.

So go on dreaming about installing your device in a vehicle. Fortunately for me and
the rest world there seems that people are begin to talk of productizing overunity
energy ideas in the near future, then we will go and be able to forget about thousands
of you dreamers because you device will not nearly have the cost benefit ratio that it
once had. These are the same dreamers by the way who have the false belief that a
product is actually protected by a patent. A patent is used successfully in conjunction
with a business strategy by an organization.

:S:MarkSCoffman


Sprocket

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 410
..... These are the same dreamers by the way who have the false belief that a
product is actually protected by a patent. A patent is used successfully in conjunction
with a business strategy by an organization.

:S:MarkSCoffman

As has been pointed out many times, all it really gives you is a legal basis to sue anyone that infringes on your intellectual property - and good luck suing the likes of Bill Gates, the lawyers will be all smiles, but all you'll end up is bankrupt!

btw, your moon mention gave me a giggle.  Having just read "Nasa Mooned America!" I went from being skeptical to an out-and-out disbeliever in that little fantasy they spun.  Superb book, with lots of 'impossibles' that I haven't seen covered elsewhere. A must-read. 

Back on topic, as there were no patents listed here, I went googling, and the only thing relevant I found was the below link - filed by Ted Annis,  J. Patrick Eberly.  All these MEG-type devices seem to be doing things along the same lines - high permeability cores, altering reluctance etc - so why is the silence from replicators so deafening!  What intrigues me about the below filing is that towards the end, they list precisely the cores used, the number of turns for their associated coils and most importantly, the key to significant OU output (200-400 COP) - the pulse rise-time!  They don't mention wire-gauge though.

http://www.faqs.org/patents/app/20090096219


Delta_V

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 4
same?

http://www.youtube.com/user/armandodepara#p/u/17/G-avdbf9B1w

- Yes and no. Between them there is a substantial difference. Have a different purpose. One is for demonstration, but this latter is a real application. In module demonstrations are shown only possibilities. It is something like a functioning model. Nothing more.

wings

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 750
- Yes and no. Between them there is a substantial difference. Have a different purpose. One is for demonstration, but this latter is a real application. In module demonstrations are shown only possibilities. It is something like a functioning model. Nothing more.

I have read enthusiastic comments on Italian site about COP ....  comments about slow reduction of temperature of the magnetic parts and headache effects on the people working close to the device.

have you any comments about that?