Itsu, did you find your bifi resonant point by the help of a scope and gen?
@MAg
Look at the simplified version of Bruto's drawing. Does it remind you something? Is something missing?
@Hoppy, starcruser
Search about telluric currents and their dynamics in different places on the planet. Don Smith had published a map on this matter. The most appropriate is to use a broadband VLF receiver (acoustic band) and a spectrum analyser to find which frequencies are stronger in our neighborhood. And then tap on it.
hi Jeg,
Honestly i am not interested in Brutto drawings like he is the teacher for Ruslan.Don't you find it's silly constructing a step up secondary coil on yoke and connecting a bulb to it.
"These are the silly things which prevent people from progressing in this topic for so long"
I am already killing little time by getting involved in discussion in the hope those whom have electronic experience and necessary tools eg:Scope are able to be lead into the deeper level of understanding into how this device likely works-
I am yet to construct a tesla coil to even commence experiment which is related to Acula tuning video but smaller version like Ruslan which looks like using around 18AWG...20AWG.
-----------------------
Back to topic which is of valuable importance- i have made new discovery today after comparing/validating the pdf as previously translated from Akula speech and Nikola Tesla interview with a lawyer as found in Russian forum page 108 of -
http://www.realstrannik.ru/forum/39-kapanadze/134930-ustanovka-ruslana-kulabuxova.html?start=1926.
I have also pasted valuable pointer from interview at the bottom also to save time-
This is the long interview-
Nikola Tesla interview his lawyer
Lawyer: "Mr Tesla, will explain to us what you mean by electro-magnetic pulse ??"
Nikola Tesla: "This means that you must have inertia in flails. (Inertia is the preservation of body mass (particle), regardless of its motion or rest). You must have a large inductance in order to perform two things;
1 in the first place: a relatively low frequency, which will reduce the emission of electromagnetic waves (ie, the magnetic field vector H = rotA → 0) to a relatively small value (ie, zero).
2 secondly, the huge resonance effect. (Resonance effect on Tesla is NOT the same LC Resonance !!)
Unable to get the resonance effect in the antenna, for example, have the right large capacity and small self-inductance. Large capacity and small self-inductance - this is the poorest kind of circuit that can be created; (The poorest kind of chain). Large capacity and small self-inductance gives poor resonance effect. That was the reason that, in my experiments in Colorado energy was 1000 times higher than in the present antennae (radio and TV). "
Lawyer: "You say that energy was 1,000 times greater. Are you saying that the voltage was increased, or current, or both ?. "
Nikola Tesla: "Yes - both. For greater clarity, I take a very large self-inductance L and a comparatively small capacity C, and a certain way so that the electricity (vector magnetic field H = rotA) can not be radiated.
I thus obtain a low frequency; But, as you know, the electromagnetic radiation (RF) is proportional to the square root of the capacity divided by the inductance.
I do not allow the energy to go out (no RF radiation from the antenna TT);
I accumulate in that circuit a tremendous energy. When it received a very high voltage, then if I want to electromagnetic waves, I'm doing (radiate radio frequency radiation), but I prefer to reduce these radiation (waves) in an amount (zero), and pass a current into the ground, because the energy of the electromagnetic wave (HF radiation from antennas TT) is not recoverable, while the current of the land can be fully recovered in the system, ie we as the energy stored in the elastic system. "
Lawyer: "What kind of flexible system you talking about?"
Nikola Tesla: "I mean that if you pass a current in a circuit with large self-induction, then no
(RF) radiation is not happening, and yet you have with low resistance, there is no way
this energy is radiated into space; hence the impulses - build up in the system. "
Lawyer: "Let's see if I understood you correctly. If you have a high-frequency radiation or electromagnetic waves emanating from your system, their energy - has been lost? "
Nikola Tesla
"Bezvovzratno lost. My circuit, you can also get the electromagnetic waves (RF radiation), for example 90% of electromagnetic waves - if you so desire, and 10% in the form of current that is passed into the ground; Or you can reverse the process and to obtain 10% of the energy as electromagnetic waves, and 90% of the energy in the form of current that is passed into the ground.
Explain with an example: "I have invented a knife. Knife can cut with a sharp edge. I inform the person who uses my invention:" You need to cut with the sharp edge. I know very well that you can cut the butter with the blunt edge, but my knife intended for it. "
You are not committed to radiate antenna TT 90% in electromagnetic radiation (RF radiation) and 10% in the form of alternating current, because the electromagnetic waves (RF radiation) lost forever, while the current pereotrazivshis several times inside the planet Earth, he travels to the most remote distance in the globe and can be fully recuperated.
This point of view, by the way, is now confirmed by a mathematical monograph Somerfelda, which showed that my theories to correct, that I was right in his explanations of these phenomena, and that professionals byly completely misled.
This is the reason why these followers of mine made mistakes when dealing with high frequency currents. They wanted to make alternators with high frequency of 200,000 cycles, suggesting that they should get 90% of the energy in the form of electromagnetic waves - and 10% in the form of current.
I used only the low frequencies, and received 90% in the form of current and only 10% in the form of electromagnetic waves, which are the losses - that's why I got these results.
You see, I have produced a device made a huge difference in potential and also and currents in an antenna circuit. These requirements must always be met, and it does not matter whether you pass or shock energy - electromagnetic waves. You want to get a high voltage and a large accumulation of vibrational energy - and besides, you can graduate this vibratory energy. Appropriate design and proper choice of wavelengths can do so to obtain, for example, 10% of these electromagnetic waves, and 90% - in the form of a current which passes through the earth.
It's what I do. Or you can get, as these radio men, 90% in the form of electromagnetic waves and only 10% - in the form of energy supply. It is suitable for both methods.
I am not producing radiation of electromagnetic waves in the TT; I am suppressing electromagnetic waves (RF radiation) in my system. You must otbrost the idea that TT is electromagnetic radiation that their energy is radiated. On my system, the CT energy is not emitted, and persists. "- Nikola Tesla in 1919.-----------------------------------------
This is my finding it seem Akula was telling the truth from his version(pdf) and compared it with the master of electricity base on old interview.
This are just of the key pointers from the old interview as shown above-
-1 in the first place: a
relatively low frequency, which will reduce the
emission of electromagnetic waves (ie, the magnetic field vector H = rotA → 0) to a relatively small value (ie, zero).
2 secondly, the huge resonance effect. (Resonance effect on Tesla is NOT the same LC Resonance !!)
Please note that later part of interview -Nikola mentioned that emission of electromagnetic wave is considered a lost.Some of us are already aware tesla coil has it's own resonanceLawyer: "You say that energy was 1,000 times greater. Are you saying that the voltage was increased, or current, or both ?. "
Nikola Tesla: "Yes - both. For greater clarity,
I take a very large self-inductance L and a comparatively small capacity C, and a certain way so that the electricity (vector magnetic field H = rotA) can not be radiated.
I thus obtain a low frequency; But, as you know, the
electromagnetic radiation (RF) is proportional to the square root of the capacity divided by the inductance.
I do not allow the energy to go out (no RF radiation from the antenna TT);
I accumulate in that circuit a tremendous energy. When it received a very high voltage, then if I want to electromagnetic waves, I'm doing (radiate radio frequency radiation), but
I prefer to reduce these radiation (waves) in an amount (zero),
and pass a current into the ground,
because the energy of the electromagnetic wave (HF radiation from antennas TT) is not recoverable, while the current of the land can be fully recovered in the system, ie we as the energy stored in the elastic system. "
I used only the low frequencies, and received 90% in the form of current and only 10% in the form of electromagnetic waves, which are the losses - that's why I got these results.
You see, I have produced a device made a huge difference in potential and also and
currents in an antenna circuit (I am curious if this is the multilayer coil which voltage is raised along with current).
These requirements must always be met, and it does not matter whether you pass or shock energy - electromagnetic waves. You want to get a high voltage and a large accumulation of vibrational energy - and besides, you can graduate this vibratory energy. Appropriate design and proper choice of wavelengths can do so to obtain, for example,
10% of these electromagnetic waves, and 90% - in the form of a current which passes through the earth.