Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE  (Read 2334997 times)

nelsonrochaa

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 653
Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #1830 on: November 25, 2014, 12:34:39 AM »
nelsonrochaa
I'm really interested in Your ideas about how this type of energy is created, what is the source ?
There must be a source, I don't believe physics laws to be so incomplete.
Who can prove what is the source of excess energy ? Figuera stated it was magnetic field (not just conversion of mechanical energy into electricity).

Hi Forest ,
I really can not honestly answer your question ...I am curious as everyone in general who frequent this type of site and study this kind of things.
My findings from the research on this subject are based on experimentation like most people.

Now my thoughts and my interpretations:
Electricity is a form of conversion of energy and i think the first and most important thing is improve the actual systems of conversion  because don’t have efficiency in the conventional way.

If we collect  a magnetic collapse of a coil to a cap, the collected result is proportional with the magnitude of the coil magnetic field magnetization. To generate this magnetic field you need current circulating in coil by a source dipole.
Now if you increase the magnetic field of the coil, the  magnetic collapse when you shut off the main power source (State 0),  will be produce at higher voltage and electrostatic current in the cap, greater than main source .
The charge of capacitor will be more faster than you charge with conventionally power source.
 
And how to use this, to increase the magnetic field without increase the consume of current in main source ?
You need a way to create a fast pulse of high current with the collected power of magnetic collapse coil, and storage in a cap , to create a rapidly discharges of several pulses of high amps much higher that  main source can provide, combined with high voltage pulse that can be provided by other coil  with BEMF.

The effect of the combination of high current pulses combined with a source of high voltage causes the particles of the atomic nucleus exchange states very quickly, negating the disintegrating forces of positive energy of the protons. At one point, a proton has a positive charge, and a neutron has
neutral charge. and the next moment, a neutron is replaced by positive charge and the proton is replaced by a neutral charge. This exchange of states occurs in unimaginable speeds, thereby nullifying the repellent forces of the same load elements generating a cancellation in the repulsion of two equal poles in the coils. For me is the reason to explain the green gap that occur in my tests.
I think  this gap color result is a Cherenkov radiation .

Read about Tesla colorado springs notes and Ev gray circuits and see the similarity in the effects.
 
This excess energy or what we can call in my opinion never will be possible measured correctly by conventional tools  because  one of the points used in the conventional measure instruments, (resistance,) seems to be in some form ignored in this type of circuits because their high impedance , caused by the differential of potential in circuit and the reactance  of the coils.

I'm just with my thoughts  and puzzle what I read and test man :) Man people say that im crazy

Ps -Sorry for the English I wish you can understand what I try explain.

Thanks and good work
 

bajac

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 285
Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #1831 on: November 25, 2014, 03:45:00 AM »
bajac

I think we are progressing so fast we need a quick look into the past and connect dots.
I strongly suggest this is  related (somehow): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_ylYgUOfUzY
and this also http://www.richlandsource.com/community/article_fbac1344-779e-11e3-8a2f-10604b9f7e7e.html


Forest,


I think you are right!


I am doing a lot of research and it is a slow process. I try to be very careful when reading the articles. You never know when they could be related. For example, I was performing an internet search using the following keyword "Ferranti" + "perpetual Motion", and found the following article from The Electrical Engineer - Volume 3 on page 201 and dated 1889. This article recounts the story of an appeal against the revocation of a patent application that involved Messrs, Gaulard, Gibbs, and Ferranti. I found the following quote taken from the second column to be interesting and with merits for further investigation:


"The specification as it originally stood, it was argued, seemed to assert that any number of induced currents could be produced by the high-tension current in the main wire without loss of electric energy in the main current - a claim which the petitioner's counsel said amounted to an assertion that the inventors had discovered perpetual motion."

At this time I am trying to find the letters patent No. 4,362 of 1882 and the provisional application No. 15,141 1885. These document may show more details of the patent application such as original drawings and the specification.

hanon

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 616
    • https://figueragenerator.wordpress.com/
Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #1832 on: November 25, 2014, 08:53:50 AM »
Hi Hanon ,
Very usable your test .
 Can i ask if you see any type of increase in the magnetic field perpendicular to main coils ?
Did you consider try to connect the main input coils in bifilar mode and pulse them?
Based in some tests that i did , i think you can achieve best results pulsing the main coils with DC at higher frequencies that 50hz .
I make some tests that can be usable to you .
one more time very thanks for your work

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hQM_Zg-R8LI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VXRjGMCBAh0




Thanks for your work.   

 Hi Nelson,
 
Your videos are very interesting . I guess that you are pulsing two coisl and you are collecting the induced magnetic field into a bifilar coil. Is that this way? I have some questions: how are your inducer coils configured: with like poles facing each other or with opposite poles? What method do you use to pulse those coils? (I would like to know this method to use it in my test. Thanks) What is the function of the capacitor? In summary I would like if you could explain shortly the setup shown in the videos. They are really very interesting!!! Thanks. 
 
Have you tested to collect the induced field with some iron core in the induced coil? If you do this test in the future please tell us which is the results. Also try to test with different induced coil orientations..

 
In my test: I am sorry but I did not measure the magnetic field perpendicular to the inducers. It was a basic configuration just to measure the induction and see the effect of a load in the input power. How can I measure the magnetic field? Which device should I use to measure it?
 

hanon

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 616
    • https://figueragenerator.wordpress.com/
Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #1833 on: November 25, 2014, 10:17:15 AM »
Hi all,

Important video to watch and digest:

A user in the spanish forum (link) has uploaded a video with the induced coils placed perpendiculary to the inducer electromagnets and using like poles facing each other (N--induced--N) (repulsion mode). Powered with AC from the mains.

See the results: the input is not affected when adding a load in the induced circuit.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=st254llePPs

Thank you very much to this user for noting this effect when testing his devices some time ago.

Regards

nelsonrochaa

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 653
Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #1834 on: November 25, 2014, 01:17:14 PM »
Hi Nelson,
 
Your videos are very interesting . I guess that you are pulsing two coisl and you are collecting the induced magnetic field into a bifilar coil. Is that this way? I have some questions: how are your inducer coils configured: with like poles facing each other or with opposite poles? What method do you use to pulse those coils? (I would like to know this method to use it in my test. Thanks) What is the function of the capacitor? In summary I would like if you could explain shortly the setup shown in the videos. They are really very interesting!!! Thanks. 
 
Have you tested to collect the induced field with some iron core in the induced coil? If you do this test in the future please tell us which is the results. Also try to test with different induced coil orientations..
In my test: I am sorry but I did not measure the magnetic field perpendicular to the inducers. It was a basic configuration just to measure the induction and see the effect of a load in the input power. How can I measure the magnetic field? Which device should I use to measure it?

Hi Hanon,
In the video i put a single turn of cable only to show how the type of connection (Bibfilar or normal) can improve the capture of induced currents. But the power collected is not by induction :) is only the result of magnetic collapse in the coils , and electrostatic currents.
I use the relay in auto-oscillation because the relay will provide the oscillation to the coils in core ,and can manage in their contacts the combination process of combine the large current collected in capacitor with the BEMF coil of the relay . Will give you the green flare as you see in my video , but the curious is how the magnetic field will increase  much higher.
I will try to make a diagram simplified to try explain better.
Thanks Hanon
 

gyulasun

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4117
Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #1835 on: November 25, 2014, 01:26:31 PM »
Hi all,

Important video to watch and digest:

A user in the spanish forum (link) has uploaded a video with the induced coils placed perpendiculary to the inducer electromagnets and using like poles facing each other (N--induced--N) (repulsion mode). Powered with AC from the mains.

See the results: the input is not affected when adding a load in the induced circuit.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=st254llePPs

Thank you very much to this user for noting this effect when testing his devices some time ago.

Regards

Hi Hanon,

Let me show you a similar principle which has been 'dormant' for some years on this forum:

http://www.overunity.com/5890/bemf-magno-motor/msg133772/#msg133772   

Member DMMPOWER wrote in Reply #4:
 
"Yes what I have found, is when you use a permanent magnet  with a moving coil you always produce emf.
But  when you use two coil that oppose one other with the same oscillating magnetic force they will cancel each other's  BEMF."
   

Gyula

nelsonrochaa

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 653
Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #1836 on: November 25, 2014, 02:51:04 PM »
Hi Hanon,

Let me show you a similar principle which has been 'dormant' for some years on this forum:

http://www.overunity.com/5890/bemf-magno-motor/msg133772/#msg133772   

Member DMMPOWER wrote in Reply #4:
 
"Yes what I have found, is when you use a permanent magnet  with a moving coil you always produce emf.
But  when you use two coil that oppose one other with the same oscillating magnetic force they will cancel each other's  BEMF."
   

Gyula

Hi Gyula yes that right ! , (But  when you use two coil that oppose one other with the same oscillating magnetic force they will cancel each other's  BEMF).

This technique , for me  is what the most machines that reclaim overunity use at many years. I think this part is the first stage to improve in efficiency of our circuits.
I think we should improving efficiency first,  the rest will came after , step bye step. 
Its very easy to anybody test this basic circuits and configurations . But is important that people abstract of how things work conventionally and observe , compare, test ....
 
like   Chris Sykes say :
The old world is gone and the NEW World is here, let the transition be a relatively easy one.
(www.hyiq.org)

Very thanks for the information.

hanon

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 616
    • https://figueragenerator.wordpress.com/
Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #1837 on: November 25, 2014, 05:00:27 PM »
Hi Hanon,

Let me show you a similar principle which has been 'dormant' for some years on this forum:

http://www.overunity.com/5890/bemf-magno-motor/msg133772/#msg133772   

Member DMMPOWER wrote in Reply #4:
 
"Yes what I have found, is when you use a permanent magnet  with a moving coil you always produce emf.
But  when you use two coil that oppose one other with the same oscillating magnetic force they will cancel each other's  BEMF."
   

Gyula

 Hi Gyulasun,
 
Thank you very much for the info.
 
Note that the this BEMF MAGNO MOTOR is also based on poles in repulsion mode (N-N or S-S).
 
The concept is used for motors, not for generators, but the underlining principle should be applicable also to generators. I copy here the sketch posted in that thread.


Please replicate the experiment shown in the video posted  before and tell you insights. Thanks!!



Regards

 

ALVARO_CS

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 178
Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #1838 on: November 25, 2014, 05:46:42 PM »
@Erfinder
thanks for sharing your point of view

bajac

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 285
Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #1839 on: November 25, 2014, 06:33:10 PM »

With relation to the highlighted, through experimentation, I have found the sited claim is as far as I am concerned 100 percent accurate.  The phrase "high-tension current" is misleading (but is your best and only clue...) however, in my opinion it is the perfect way to describe the "current" in question, but owing this manner of phrasing, identifying the nature of the beast, and or the mechanism at play and the specific relations necessary to practice the claim is next to impossible.  I recommend you spend as much time as you feel necessary in this regard, this is one of the few ways forward


Regards

Thanks for the info. I was able to find the patent and other documents related to this case.

bajac

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 285
Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #1840 on: November 25, 2014, 06:49:20 PM »
It is my opinion, one supported by experiment that the attached image is an aerial view.  It is my opinion that the inventor is calling our attention into three specific locations and asking us to consider the relations between the three. 

Regards

Erfinder,
 
If we refer to the diagram you posted in your reply, I agree that it is a kind of a plan view. If you assume all electromagnets - N, S, and Y - are wound in the same direction and also that each N and S lineup are connected in a similar fashion, then the battery connections and polarities of the electromagnets shown by Figuera in this drawing make sense. The top electrogmagnets will always maintain a south pole at the top of the iron core while the bottom electromagnets will maintain a north pole also at the top of their iron cores. The electromagnets in the centre labeled as Y, do not have a fix polarity because the voltages and currents induced are AC.
 
To me, the scope and intent of the 1908 patent is clear. If others want to claim that Figuera meant a different design or that he was trying to hide the true concept of his invention, then it is their interpretation. However, the description and drawings in the 1908 patent are vey clear and unambiguous.
« Last Edit: November 26, 2014, 12:19:11 AM by bajac »

forest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4076
Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #1841 on: November 25, 2014, 11:04:08 PM »
Hi Forest ,
I really can not honestly answer your question ...I am curious as everyone in general who frequent this type of site and study this kind of things.
My findings from the research on this subject are based on experimentation like most people.

Now my thoughts and my interpretations:
Electricity is a form of conversion of energy and i think the first and most important thing is improve the actual systems of conversion  because don’t have efficiency in the conventional way.

If we collect  a magnetic collapse of a coil to a cap, the collected result is proportional with the magnitude of the coil magnetic field magnetization. To generate this magnetic field you need current circulating in coil by a source dipole.
Now if you increase the magnetic field of the coil, the  magnetic collapse when you shut off the main power source (State 0),  will be produce at higher voltage and electrostatic current in the cap, greater than main source .
The charge of capacitor will be more faster than you charge with conventionally power source.
 
And how to use this, to increase the magnetic field without increase the consume of current in main source ?
You need a way to create a fast pulse of high current with the collected power of magnetic collapse coil, and storage in a cap , to create a rapidly discharges of several pulses of high amps much higher that  main source can provide, combined with high voltage pulse that can be provided by other coil  with BEMF.

The effect of the combination of high current pulses combined with a source of high voltage causes the particles of the atomic nucleus exchange states very quickly, negating the disintegrating forces of positive energy of the protons. At one point, a proton has a positive charge, and a neutron has
neutral charge. and the next moment, a neutron is replaced by positive charge and the proton is replaced by a neutral charge. This exchange of states occurs in unimaginable speeds, thereby nullifying the repellent forces of the same load elements generating a cancellation in the repulsion of two equal poles in the coils. For me is the reason to explain the green gap that occur in my tests.
I think  this gap color result is a Cherenkov radiation .

Read about Tesla colorado springs notes and Ev gray circuits and see the similarity in the effects.
 
This excess energy or what we can call in my opinion never will be possible measured correctly by conventional tools  because  one of the points used in the conventional measure instruments, (resistance,) seems to be in some form ignored in this type of circuits because their high impedance , caused by the differential of potential in circuit and the reactance  of the coils.

I'm just with my thoughts  and puzzle what I read and test man :) Man people say that im crazy

Ps -Sorry for the English I wish you can understand what I try explain.

Thanks and good work
 

Thank You Nelson. I doubt it is related to atomic change, however. I think it is simply electrostatic force being not static. High frequency magnetic field disturbance, maybe caused by cosmic rays.So called radiant energy. There are other possibilities also but not so many and all lead to external power source. The simplest idea is magnetic field being whirl of energy so magnetic field CAN do work and Figuera proved electricity comes from magnetic field not mechanical power.
I see you are far ahead of us here, and I must state I'm jealous. I was not prepared in 2005 when I found radiant energy emanating from my car coil experiment and precharging all metal objects in nearby. :'( Unfortunately I was working with low frequencies circuit at 200Hz so it was dangerous (at 20kV!!!). I was lucky (to stay alive)  and unlucky. Now I know your explanation is perfectly clear . Thank You.

bajac

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 285
Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #1842 on: November 26, 2014, 12:30:15 AM »
Hi Forest ,
I really can not honestly answer your question ...I am curious as everyone in general who frequent this type of site and study this kind of things.
My findings from the research on this subject are based on experimentation like most people.

Now my thoughts and my interpretations:
Electricity is a form of conversion of energy and i think the first and most important thing is improve the actual systems of conversion  because don’t have efficiency in the conventional way.

If we collect  a magnetic collapse of a coil to a cap, the collected result is proportional with the magnitude of the coil magnetic field magnetization. To generate this magnetic field you need current circulating in coil by a source dipole.
Now if you increase the magnetic field of the coil, the  magnetic collapse when you shut off the main power source (State 0),  will be produce at higher voltage and electrostatic current in the cap, greater than main source .
The charge of capacitor will be more faster than you charge with conventionally power source.
 
And how to use this, to increase the magnetic field without increase the consume of current in main source ?
You need a way to create a fast pulse of high current with the collected power of magnetic collapse coil, and storage in a cap , to create a rapidly discharges of several pulses of high amps much higher that  main source can provide, combined with high voltage pulse that can be provided by other coil  with BEMF.

The effect of the combination of high current pulses combined with a source of high voltage causes the particles of the atomic nucleus exchange states very quickly, negating the disintegrating forces of positive energy of the protons. At one point, a proton has a positive charge, and a neutron has
neutral charge. and the next moment, a neutron is replaced by positive charge and the proton is replaced by a neutral charge. This exchange of states occurs in unimaginable speeds, thereby nullifying the repellent forces of the same load elements generating a cancellation in the repulsion of two equal poles in the coils. For me is the reason to explain the green gap that occur in my tests.
I think  this gap color result is a Cherenkov radiation .

Read about Tesla colorado springs notes and Ev gray circuits and see the similarity in the effects.
 
This excess energy or what we can call in my opinion never will be possible measured correctly by conventional tools  because  one of the points used in the conventional measure instruments, (resistance,) seems to be in some form ignored in this type of circuits because their high impedance , caused by the differential of potential in circuit and the reactance  of the coils.

I'm just with my thoughts  and puzzle what I read and test man :) Man people say that im crazy

Ps -Sorry for the English I wish you can understand what I try explain.

Thanks and good work
 


Nelsonrochaa,

I find your description very interesting. I also did some research on this subject. I published a paper proposing what I believe to be the bases of operation of the Edwin Gray tube and devices that use only coils. I posted this paper back on 2012 at this site. You can find a copy of this paper in this link

http://www.scribd.com/doc/205259930/Tesla-Gray-Mark-Meyer-R04

I think what you stated is very close to what I proposed in the paper. Have you read this document?

Thank you for your help on this thread!

PS: for some reason I can find the document in this site.





marathonman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 860
Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #1843 on: November 26, 2014, 04:08:15 AM »
It is my opinion, one supported by experiment that the attached image is an aerial view.  It is my opinion that the inventor is calling our attention into three specific locations and asking us to consider the relations between the three. 

Specifically our attention is directed downward, into what is commonly referred to as the North pole, and into what is commonly referred to as the South pole.  It must be noted that the polarity of the middle winding is not indicated, and I believe the lack of polarity here is saying as much as would be said if there was a polarity indicated.  I am of the opinion that the polarity isn't present because the coil is not oriented like the other two coils.  I am of the opinion that coil "y" is arranged in such a manner that the flux spinning around N and S "run into and through" "y" from one end to the other.  When viewed from the perspective of spin directions we find that at the location between N and S the flux is unidirectional.  Here we find "y" is cleverly positioned in the location of not only unidirectional  flux, but also maximum flux density.

I gather from the disclosure that the inventor assumes that the reader of the document is aware of the spin directions associated with N and S.  This, my perspective on this changes things, (they did for me anyway) there is a very specific message being shared by the author, and to me it appears he is demonstrating that a specific geometry is required to capitalize on his invention, very simple but specific relations.  This disclosure shows me that the inventor had a very deep understanding of the fields, and knew how to relate the inducing to the induced.  The block diagram is just that, a block diagram, one which points us "a" direction.  As far as I can tell, after much reading through this thread, this particular direction, the one I am suggesting, has not been considered.  I hope that my perspective, aids one or more of you who are desirous of seeing something materialize out of the effort going into this area of research.



Regards
I agree,
i think there  is a reason for the opposite wiring of the Primaries. the spin direction is a viable  and rational  aspect of the Figueras devise  and it could quite possibly be a missing key to the figueras devise just so easily overlooked .

nelsonrochaa

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 653
Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #1844 on: November 26, 2014, 01:30:09 PM »
Thank You Nelson. I doubt it is related to atomic change, however. I think it is simply electrostatic force being not static. High frequency magnetic field disturbance, maybe caused by cosmic rays.So called radiant energy. There are other possibilities also but not so many and all lead to external power source. The simplest idea is magnetic field being whirl of energy so magnetic field CAN do work and Figuera proved electricity comes from magnetic field not mechanical power.
I see you are far ahead of us here, and I must state I'm jealous. I was not prepared in 2005 when I found radiant energy emanating from my car coil experiment and precharging all metal objects in nearby. :'( Unfortunately I was working with low frequencies circuit at 200Hz so it was dangerous (at 20kV!!!). I was lucky (to stay alive)  and unlucky. Now I know your explanation is perfectly clear . Thank You.

Hi Forest,
I Want to tell you that you never achieve some relevant result in this matter if you use low frequency 200Hz . You need to start at 1kz  at least.

When you say : " and all lead to external power source" -----Yes you have true ! you need ever a power source to drive circuit parts. but in this stage is not the point !
Think in this way:
Imagine you need drive a motor 12v  1000w . You need 1200A of current to drive the motor at best ratio ok ?
Now if you have a method to create the equivalent magnetic field using not 1200A in the load but only 10A, how you will consider this ? A overunity machine ? or a efficiency  method to drive a 1000W motor ?

You say " I found radiant energy emanating from my car coil experiment and precharging all metal objects in nearby"

Yes it true . I observe the same . I can tell you a curious thing that happened with capacitors charge.  The capacitors charges without  noting difference in polarity .
A example :
If you put a electrolytic capacitor to charge you have to respect  their +- configuration. But i can assure you  that cap will charge rapidly without distinguish - or + in their charge.   

 You say " electricity comes from magnetic field not mechanical power"
Yes  it true ! Figuera use a form of magnetic amplification with blind eye schema  CW-CCW coils annulling the repulsing NN confrontation field forces of coils.
The  output power comes from the magnetic field generated in the process not from source.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qW2YVh044JI

I know it's hard to understand sometimes what I say and show in my videos with my crap circuits :)
Thanks and good luck