Hi PW.

I recall the figure you were referring to, however that wasn't what I was trying to post there. 

If you really want me to dig that scope shot up, let me know and I will look for it.

.99,

Not really, I just thought that was what you were looking for.

The capture in your previous post was deemed just plain wierd, if I recall.

Not sure what the disposition was regarding its "wierdness".  Possibly this was a capture using the earlier FG and possibly it had sustained some damage to its circuitry.  Do I recall correctly that she mentioned needing to swap FG's at one point because one gave up?

PW

Here is a Feb 2011 scope shot from Rose that I had annotated with a question; why no current if the SW is ON?

The wave forms are quite close, but I'm not sure why the FG signal appears so poorly formed. Even if Q1 was intact, it is doubtful there is enough Gate drive in this scope shot to turn it ON.

This shot that you have reproduced is SCRN0184. It was almost certainly produced with a triangle ramp gate signal, perhaps tilted to a sawtooth waveform, with offset applied and yes, the transistor will only turn on at the very tip of the sawtooth. Here's a video showing very similar traces from Tar Baby using a triangle ramp.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3xs_ZsGhK9o
(except of course all my mosfets are known to be working.)

Here's SCRN0183: I think there's enough gate amplitude here to turn Q1 on definitely at the peak of the sawtooth gate signal but it doesn't appear to be doing so.
And SCRN0243, referred to in the video.

Now Ainslie is lying about the scopeshots we've been posting, claiming that she never posted them and that MrSean2k and I have somehow obtained them from her computer without authorization. This accusation coming from her is Yet Another Libel that she cannot support with a shred of evidence. SHE POSTED EVERY ONE OF THOSE SCOPESHOTS HERSELF and the proof is easy to find.

I've attached just a few of the proofs below. Many more can be found in the several locked threads, if Ainslie hasn't managed to edit them away. Her scope saves the screens as .bmp files, and of course Stefan doesn't allow them because they can be very large. So what did the mendacious and ignorant Ainslie do? She simply changed the file extension from .bmp to .jpg --- without actually converting the files. This got them past the upload filter, and the forum does display them in-line, but when you download them they won't open, because they aren't jpegs! You have to change the filename back to .bmp so that your image software will load them properly. It's yet another example of Ainslie's ignorance and mendacity, changing file extensions, sneaking .bmp files past Stefan's filter and lying about what they actually are.

I'm tired of doing Ainslie's homework for her. As I have said before, if she has a specific scopeshot that she claims not to have posted, let her specify it and I will show exactly where I got it. I made this same offer months ago when she first started lying about not having posted these shots and accusing me of "rifling" her computers.

Ainslie needs to get a grip on herself, stop these insane libels, APOLOGIZE for making them, and withdraw all the false claims she's made over the years! Especially the mendacious and errorfilled daft manuscripts!


Further, since she has now had well over a week to produce the proof that she says is so easy to do-- the proof that she can reproduce the Figure 3 scopeshot as claimed with all mosfets functional, etc--- but has not been able to manage it, we can conclude that she can't do it, that I am right and she is wrong (yet again, time after time), and we will be expecting those errata notices and apologies forthwith. Especially since I've already posted 2 comprehensive video explanations/demonstrations explaining and illustrating the issue, along with duplicating the Current and Gate traces in the Figure 3 scopeshot and showing the difference between functioning and missing mosfets in the Q1 position.

@Picowatt: Here are a couple more excellent examples, in Ainslie's post, of the anomalous current traces.
http://www.overunity.com/10407/rosemary-ainslie-circuit-demonstration-on-saturday-march-12th-2011/msg278651/#msg278651
These are all taken March 2nd 2011.

SCRN0267:

Hi TK
You are a brilliant person, sense of humor and I dare say because of your creativity get a little depressed at times.
The best thing you can do with Rosemary is ignore her. Others will come and be suckered in, but ultimately it will all turn to grief.
No matter how much convincing you try to show others the truth, they still want to believe and drink the coolaide.
You should see my hate mail, threats and everything else i get when I point out a measurement error or that the technology is bogus.
To be honest , your talents are far better used than giving her any more thought.
I am saying this as of all the people I know, your definitely in the top 3. (that is a lot of scientists, engineers and researchers I know)
What hurts the most is being ignored, ( like me and the academics). People like Sterling will always give her coverage and act as her cheer squad. Others will follow.
so do your self a favor, there is no need to point out anything...the true believers will always believe.
You will probably ignore this advise, just do not take offence by it. Believe me I have been bitter and twisted in the past when I have seen the lies people propagate for the purposes of ego or profit.
Kind Regards
Mark

I kind of understand TK.
Talk to you soon I will send you a PM tomorrow, have something interesting for you and Mark E.
Mark

@TK
I see she is still trying hard to convince other's of her magical circuit.Below is a scope shot of a circuit i am working on at the moment. Channel 1(the yellow trace) is across a 1 ohm CSR from P/in,and channel 2(the blue trace)is across another 1 ohm CSR to the load.Both voltages are at 12 volts.
Do you think i should get a paper written about my setup? lol.

@Stumpy:
Thank you for your comments. Believe me, I am fully aware of the psychological dynamics of this situation. And since you are clearly watching my videos, I think you can tell that the Ainslie situation does not really consume a lot of my time. 

However..... efforts to change the status quo should be directed at Ainslie, I think. I'm not about to "walk away" when that creature is actually canvassing friends and possible and potential employers, trying to find out my real name and address and trying to sully my reputation with them with her lies, while at the same time continuing to make her false claims, harassing people and attempting to gain monetary awards for her nonsense.
If she wants to carry out her "research" and post it on her private forum, fine, LEAVE ME OUT OF IT. After, of course, refuting my challenges and my statements about her and her claims. But that is not what she's doing, is it. She refers to me constantly in the most insulting manner possible and she adds false claim upon false claim on a daily basis, it seems, and never manages to provide any support.

She's accused me of all kinds of ridiculous things, like hacking her computer, stealing files, and even orchestrating physical breakins into her compound. She's threatened me with all kinds of threats, legal, computer-directed and even physical, and she lies about my replications of her circuitry and my testing of them. In short..... it's personal, and every time she pops up her head with another claim about her "reviewed" and "published" daft manuscripts, which are neither, and another "Ickle Pickle" slur, I'll be there with my database of facts, references, and fully repeatable demonstrations that show, to all concerned, just what she is and what her "research" consists of.

This present thread, for example, wasn't started by me until _after_ she had already snivelled on her promise of the June 1 demonstration, that she promised for many months, finally settling on a date and advertising it on PESN, with the usual set of false claims and insults directed towards me and the many other replicators who found the truth about her and her circuitry claims. When she called it off... as I predicted she would.... then I started this thread to challenge her continuing line of BS. It's a return stroke to her serve.... and she has yet to volley, and will not manage ever to do so. If she does manage to pull off a demonstration on June 22, which I doubt, it will be the same old same old and most certainly will Not show any refutations of my work or my assertions about hers... because I am right.

Meanwhile, I'll still be doing my thing, making amazing effects with properly switched mosfets, with overunity COP ratios, that, calculated by her chosen method, would be in the thousands. Sorry... I can't quite manage the COP INFINITY that she often claims... but then neither can she.

And of course my vacuum plasma work continues as do my extreme high voltage investigations and my Arduino learning adventures. I've actually written around a hundred different little application sketches for Arduino, doing everything from Sous Vide crockpot cooker control to 3-d multiplexed cube displays to the present toying around with the software FFT color organ light show and realtime audio signal processing... and the "processing" application itself. There are lots of much better Arduino tutorials than what I'm putting up and I learn a lot from watching them, and I'm really starting to get the hang of coding. I taught myself c++ in college but never liked it much then and didn't use it for anything really, but now the c++ coding is really clicking and starting to be a lot of fun.


@TinMan:
Sure, why not. Your scope shot proves that you can at least manage to make and post your own scopeshots, perform your own demonstrations, answer questions when they are put to you, and provide evidence that you are doing as you say. That puts you _way ahead_ of Ainslie and all her ilk. I'll bet you haven't written a single letter demanding that a busy "academic" pay attention to your reams of word-salad "thesis" either, have you.

From working with you in the past I know that you are careful to avoid making claims you can't back up with demonstrations, and that you are happy to admit when you don't know something and to take advice from those who might be a page or two ahead of you in the book. Personally, I find your explorations a lot more interesting than Ainslie's tired old "zipon" fantasies which explain nothing and predict nothing, and your experimental work is accomplished with a lot more panache and direction than hers is, and should be seen as an example for those who follow. I don't always agree with your conclusions nor you with mine but we manage to discuss matters productively for both of us, and I've had fun with your circuits that I've tested.

Nice that you got hold of a 2-channel scope, and are willing to share data from it. Cheers.... and I hope it has finally cooled off a bit for you, we are already into the 35 degree days here with 40 to come next month.

--TK