I'm going to open up a chain of stores called "Radio Shack Classic+."  You can buy all your parts for your projects and look at the CB radios and admire the Garrard Zero 100 turntables.  Look at how beautiful they are.  Yes, there will even be a tube tester.   

Our keen employees can even advise you on your projects.  You will be in heaven.

I have hired a guaranteed super Internet buzz meister/demand creation _deep_ geek and consciousness and spirituality consultant guy.  Wait till you see when we turn on the spigots for the crowd funding!  It will be like manna from heaven!  Bloated with money.

MH:

That is a beautiful piece of workmanship.  I was always partial to the linear tracking style as it placed less stress on the vinyl records and the needle.  I don't recall any of those looking like this however.  At least none that I could afford.

Bill

TK, Thanks for posting that bizarre exchange, clearly some are taking the risk of aiding and abetting criminals in the commission of
crimes, to draw a long bow that is. But still in my opinion all who promote a scam are complicit in some way, just that there is a point
where it becomes criminal.

As for slander, he's guilty !

Please TK start a go-fund-me to raise money to take him to court for slander, promise in the go-fund-me if you win you will donate
the funds raised to charity. I would love to read the transcript of the trial because it would contain concise explanations of reactive
power and the QEG scam would be cited and exposed in court.

No one can dispute the facts about the reality of a resonant tank, it's fully understood already.

If I get well enough soon I will replicate your Micro QEG and if even i can replicate close enough your results then there is no
excuse for many others to do so if they so desire to witness the truth of the matter.

Aside from that I think for the general experimenter in this line of "Hobby" it is a must top build and operate a basic tuned tank circuit
as well as a concatenated arrangement of linked tuned circuits, so that they can get a general understanding of L/C tuning to a certain frequency and the effects of powering secondary circuits from that as a means to an end.

Without the person seeing the kind of VAR that can be produced in a small simple low powered circuit even like mine, on your own
bench then those people are just spectating and speculating.

You help a lot of people TK and a lot of people very much appreciate what you have shown. But I'm sure you already realize that.

..

You called the Bloom Box a free energy device before and then it was clearly explained to you that it is a device <b>that consumes fuel.</b> just made reference to it again.  Why?  It's not relevant and it is not free energy.  You have repeatedly been told that renewable energy has nothing to do with the QEG yet you are still talking about renewable energy.

Please understand the definition of FREE first. FREE actually needs energy. The letter/word free requires zeros and ones in this forum to be created.

Free is not “the big band” which I'm pretty sure “the big bang” requires energy to create itself.

By free is gathering energy with out paying a prime price for it....

In retail we have items that cost thousandths of dollars and hundreds of dollars. In both it is the same technology, the difference is in BEAUTY.

Take for example a high quality tube amplifier. You will pay $5000 USA dollars for an entry level and upwards of $10,000 for a top of the line one. It is the same tenology in both...the difference is that the higher quality is catered to the rich people while the less expensive is catered to the middle class and the poor cannot uy none of their items unless they get their hands on a used one.

To put it simply FREE energy is  like our SUN will continue to burn for millions of years...the sun is a QEG. Now then we have the earth a smaller QEG...then we have magnetism yet another QEG.

FREE ENERGY from “the big bang” being distributed to power the sun → power earth → power the atmosphere. Etc.

You are the one totally lacking in imagination and you fail to demonstrate any critical thinking skills.  You make reference to a magnet and make an implication that it is associated with free energy.  That's nothing more than you failing to think.

Well we know that everything is magnetic....it's all about scales...from very little to very strong. LIKE A CAPACITOR with micro farads to mega farads.

Your skin cells have magnetism in the micro levels. Glass has magnetism in the micro levels...gelod, silver too. IRON can gather higher magnetic FREE energy than other quantum atoms. I think this is pretty simple to understand.

When a megnet manufacturer understands that glass cannot be magnetized why in the work make magnets out of glass? Lol They just magnetize the metals that can be charged with magnetism. So they make this metal from experience cooking in the kitchen....ok...now they have a “ecipe” to hold magnetism for years/decades....so what do they do? They use a less than a second HIGH current to zap the metal. After this zapping, the magnetic field from the high voltage gets “created” in the non magnetic metal. This energy stays in the magnet for years/decades. The magnet does not have MAGMA (lava when outside a volcano) in the middle. Which the earth magnetic field supposedly is magnetized due to the molten magma in the core. Well the earth could have been just zapped with a VERY HIGH voltage from the outer space and got magnetized due to the earths metalic propeties only and not due to the magma!

At any rate. Stop saying renewable cuz everything is renewable....even your poop by a dung battle. Everything is renewable.....is there energy that is not RENEWABLE?

Rust likes metals = renewable. Animals die = renewable. Light is food and cannot reach the dark spaces....ohhh my where did the light went? It gets eaten up by i'm imagining other micro atoms that shyt to0 = renewable. EVERYTHING IN THE UNIVERSE IS RENEWABLE! SO, what are you so inclined to say that renewable energy is different from something else?

Joel, I watched the video on the Bloom Box and the inventor clearly states several times that the units consume fuel as in fuel gas
in one specific case or some other fuel, as well as inputting fuel air also needs to be supplied. But without the fuel there is no output.

Considering the 800 million dollars invested already and the fact that the tax payers have covered half the cost for google and so
forth to install the units, and also considering that the units require a continuous fuel supply, which must be paid for.

So before any free energy is produced they need to pay back the tax payers and the investors the hundreds of millions of dollars first.

Then after they repay all the costs involved in the development any energy produced without cost will be free to whoever uses it.

If it remains tax payer funded it's the masses paying for googles power plants and lining the pockets of the inventor.

He should be able to show a zero power bill or an amount of exported power from the unit that powers his home for free with no
input of fuel gas, but he cannot because the system requires a supply of fuel which cost money to buy, or costs time and effort to
produce at the very least try to make fuel gas for free without spending any money, time or effort.

To me it looks like a very high priced money spinner designed to make people think it's a saving tech while fleecing the taxpayer
purse.

Besides there is zero proof of any free energy from it if there is hard proof please show it or link to it. And I don;t just mean drivel from a mans mouth, I mean test results confirmed by a neutral party. Have fun.

..

..

@MarkE,

You're the one that needs a dictionary!

Firstly: "Ferrite may refer to: Ferrite (iron)".


"Iron is a chemical element with the symbol Fe (from Latin: ferrum and atomic number 26. It is a metal in the first transition series".


Secondly: Transition series refers to the isotopes, magnets in line.


Thirdly: "The magnetocaloric effect (MCE, from magnet and calorie) is a magneto-thermodynamic phenomenon in which a temperature change of a suitable material is caused by exposing the material to a changing magnetic field".


Fourthly:

@MarkE,

You're the one that needs a dictionary!

Firstly: "Ferrite may refer to: Ferrite (iron)".


"Iron is a chemical element with the symbol Fe (from Latin: ferrum and atomic number 26. It is a metal in the first transition series".


Secondly: Transition series refers to the isotopes, magnets in line.


Thirdly: "The magnetocaloric effect (MCE, from magnet and calorie) is a magneto-thermodynamic phenomenon in which a temperature change of a suitable material is caused by exposing the material to a changing magnetic field".


Fourthly:

Synchro1 you really seem to take great delight in being horribly wrong.

No, iron is not ferrite.  Iron is a component in some ferrites.  Ferrites are ceramics of the general form: MxFe₂O₄, where Mx is a transition metal.  Iron can be one of those transition metals.  Confusion on that point may be why Wikipedia says what it does.  You can check with the people who make the stuff: such as TDK and Ferroxcube.

Or try Encyclopedia Brittanica:

ferrite, ferrite [Credit: Omegatron]a ceramic-like material with magnetic properties that are useful in many types of electronic devices. Ferrites are hard, brittle, iron-containing, and generally gray or black and are polycrystalline—i.e., made up of a large number of small crystals. They are composed of iron oxide and one or more other metals in chemical combination.

A ferrite is formed by the reaction of ferric oxide (iron oxide or rust) with any of a number of other metals, including magnesium, aluminum, barium, manganese, copper, nickel, cobalt, or even iron itself.

A ferrite is usually described by the formula M(FexOy), where M represents any metal that forms divalent bonds, such as any of the elements mentioned earlier. Nickel ferrite, for instance, is NiFe2O4, and manganese ferrite is MnFe2O4; both are spinel minerals. The garnet mineral known as YIG, containing the rare-earth element yttrium, has the formula Y3Fe5

No transition series do not refer to:  "magnets in line".  The transition series are a number of atomic elements.

No ferrite does not transmutate.

Magnetocaloric effects are not adiabatic.

@MarkE,


Quote from MarkE:


"Magnetocaloric effects are not adiabatic".

Clean your glasses off and see if you can read the last two words in this paragraph:

"The magnetocaloric effect (MCE, from magnet and calorie) is a magneto-thermodynamic phenomenon in which a temperature change of a suitable material is caused by exposing the material to a changing magnetic field. This is also known by low temperature physicists as adiabatic demagnetization".


Adiabatic means there's a temperature change without heat transfer. Look MarkE, I want you to stop confusing people while acting as a know it all.
You're really really STUPID!

I see, so you're going for full-on offensive.  When heat is exchanged with the environment, the process is no longer adiabatic.