Nice backpedaling and a dash of "CYA" (cover your arse)


Max deflection of the laser is from the magnetic centrifugal.   WHY?  Because the radial dielectric of  EM/LIGHT is repulsed by same
Max ABSORPTION of the laser is from the "magnets" DIELECTRIC INERTIAL PLANE.....WHY?   Because Dielectricity is mutually convergent.


Had that confirmed last night by another:::::

QUOTE:::::

"You're right about blue. I've made a few tests using my spectrometer and see the blue and shorter is mostly absorbed.
This thing even eats blue laser to the point where it barely gets through."




GOOD, TELL THAT TO THE PATENTED DEVICE AND EVIDENCES AGAINST YOU.


Your lips vs. the evidences.       Which WINS?


Magnetically non-responsive?  SAYS WHO??? YOU.          Too bad,  light just called and said you're full of it.  


His spectrometer must be BROKEN TOO!!!!   



PROXY:     A  BS SOPHISTIC TERM OFTEN USED AS A CONVOLUTED NON-ANSWER TO COVER ONES ASS

TA,

I don't see it as backpedaling at all.  When it is not the middle of the night, I try to choose my words carefully so as to be as accurate as possible.  I'll stand by my original statement if it makes you feel more comfortable.  We can let the readers decide if "non-magnetic" versus the less ambiguous "magnetically non-responsive" is backpedaling or not.

As for your friend's comment that you have again posted, nowhere in that quote from him is a magnetic field even mentioned.  He seems to be stating that blue and shorter wavelengths are more strongly absorbed.  Not sure what medium is being discussed, but if it is one full of nanoparticles or scattering inclusions, one would expect greater absorption at shorter wavelengths.  See "Rayleigh scattering". 

But again, you seem to just want to avoid the issues raised and turn this into some sort of personal pissing match. 

Good luck with that...  That is not my idea of good science or rationale discussion.

PW

Indeed Kenny.  PW is brilliant and he has great depth and breadth of experience and knowledge.  I have qualified PW and he is brilliant.  I have qualified you and you are just a Joe Blow that has no clue with respect to what you are talking about.  It's like comparing an elephant to an ant, and you are the ant.

You are another Jason Verbelli.  Jason is a hoot because he also plays with magnets and thinks that he is discovering things.  You two should play together.

You are too stupid to give PW some respect.  You are too stupid to recognize and admit that you know that you don't know a lot of stuff, not to mention that you also don't know what you don't know, and that's a LOT of stuff.  Between those two things your "pie chart of technical knowledge" is mostly the black of ignorance and on top of the black of ignorance is the dark blue of outright stupidity and comical "performance art" bad behaviour.   All that is left in your pie chart is a little sliver of white light, the rest is all black and blue.

And what makes it even more surreal is that you have supporters that only know that they must support what is "alternative" no matter how stupid and ridiculous it is and no matter how outrageous and borderline insane the proponent of the "alternative" proposition is.  They are just sellouts.

You would not last more than five minutes speaking to scientific and engineering professionals at a conference.  You would start to pitch your nonsense and they would look at you like you were insane.  It would quickly become apparent that you could not punch your way out of a wet paper bag when it comes to this stuff.

You claim that you have "studied magnetism" for 20 years, yet you balked when I mentioned the term "flux."  You are giving yourself away right there Kenny.  There is no recovery from that moment, you fell flat on your face into the mud and still haven't gotten up.

I can't go to some alternative music record launch party for some alternative band and make it like I know the "scene" because I know nothing about the current alternative music scene.  I would not be able to chat with people and make it like I knew what I was talking about.  DO YOU GET THAT?  I would never pretend that I know about the alternative music scene because I know next to nothing about it.

You, on the other hand, DON'T GET IT.  This is all an act combined with self-delusion on your part.  You are your own writer and the only actor in your own theater-of-the-absurd play.  You can't sustain this farcical charade indefinitely, you are eventually going to burn out from the excessive mental effort it takes to sustain it.  When you run out of discoveries and "tricks" and get tired of the general bad behaviour thuggish clown act - you will exit stage left and disappear from this forum.

You know deep down inside this is all just an act on your part.  You know deep down inside you really don't know what you are talking about with respect to magnetics, and forget even talking about electromagentics, there you are totally clueless.  You know deep down inside that PW really knows his stuff, you can feel it too.  You are talking to a seasoned gentleman that may have more than 40 years worth of experience.  And here you are acting like some Insane Clown Posse Magnet Nut, making a complete fool of yourself.  You can't keep this up indefinitely because it's psychologically unhealthy for you to do so.

The only question is is when are you going to throw in the towel.

Sorry to be so brutally honest but you know inside you deserve the smack-down for acting like such a potty-mouthed ignorant thug.

MileHigh

Tinsh!t Koala quote:

"Not bad for someone who doesn't believe in overunity or free energy. Or did I get the wrong Kenny Wheeler again? It's a common name. "



Whatta douche bag troll...that patent is from nearly a decade ago.

Back then I didn't know what a slanderous lying sack of Shi!t this shill is either.

Life is a learning curve...likely also subject to the influence of magnetic fields.

Regards...

You are right, that is an old patent, isn't it. And nothing has come from the company that was going to make overunity motors using it.
 
Patents containing Kenneth L. Wheeler or variants of that name as the inventor or co-inventor are pretty hard to find, though. It would be easier if he would just give us their numbers.

How about this one: A posture chair for fat people.

http://www.google.com/patents/US6059239?cl=en

Is that our boy? Oh wait... that one is from FOURTEEN years ago. Never mind then. Or maybe that's why he retired so early. There are certainly plenty of fat people around with poor posture!

(Too bad Denise Anderson's patents are all in the field of perfume chemistry.)

Good grief! Do you mean.... it is actually possible that I am sitting my skinny ass down in a Wheeler Posture Chair at this very moment? Not the one for fat people, just the ordinary one from 1977:
www.google.com/patents/US4170382

I got mine at a yard sale for ten bucks... and had to repair it so it would hold my scrawny 98-pound weakling frame.

You made my day, Zero.

Tinman,

There are indeed magneto-optic effects.  Examples are the "Faraday effect", which relates to light passing thru a medium that changes in the presence of a magnetic field and the "magneto-optic Kerr effect", which relates to light reflecting off of a magnetized surface.  Both the Faraday and Kerr effect relate to changes to the polarization of light. 

The refractive index of some materials/fluids is polarization dependent, so it is possible to use the Faraday effect, for example, to cause the path of light to deflect/change when passing thru those materials in the presence of a magnetic field due to the change in polarization.     

Magneto-optic Kerr effect laser microscopy is used, for example, to visualize the domain structures of magnetic materials by measuring the change to the polarization of a polarized laser beam reflected off a magnetized surface.

However, to suggest that light itself can be deflected by a magnetic field is a claim that in and of itself would be quite extraordinary.  No light deflecting effects are observed in the typical 1.5T field of an MRI tunnel, nor has any such deflection  been observed at field strengths in the tens of Tesla's of research magnets.     



PW

Mmm-so do we now need to prove the device that is to prove the magnetic vortex?-sounds like another fun experiment. For this I will need to order a laser-about a 3 day wait. Then build a very strong electromagnet, driven by my SG, and appropriate driver. Lets see if we can bend a laser beam of light.

Lets see if we can bend a laser beam of light.

Absolutely you can, but dont hope on getting a patent on it,  someone beat you to the punchline on that one. 

Was once a good thread UNTIL THE BOLD CAPITAL letters incessantly placed at random LOCATIONS IN SENTENCES compulsion took over.  Annoying is an UNDERSTATEMENT.  See you at another thread.