Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Andrea Rossi Vindicated? Cold Fusion Takes Another Step Towards Credibility  (Read 24539 times)

profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Vortex1:'Nickel powder 2-4uM and Lithium Aluminum Hydride in a 4 to 1 proportion by volume (approx). A few grams were donated to me for the test by an interested party.'

I would suggest adding alumina in powder form to this mix then sealing whole mix in a sealed copper tube(welded shut on both ends).then oil-bath it or resist-heat it and compare to a dummy.this way would rule out leaks at least(h2 won't go thru copper)use small coppertube and small amounts of mix to minimize damage incase of explosion.(put perspex plastic sheet between the experiment and yourself).I'm getting this idea from a guy called chan from buildaecat.com who did this but used MgH2/nickel/copper/iron powder in a sealed copper tube and claimed excess heat for days on end in his oilbath at around 200degrees c.I've got plenty ideas for other chemical tests but you would have to know your chemistry pretty well in order to chek them out. 

profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
@vortex you may even want to try your mix in a sealed copper tube(welded shut on both ends) WITHOUT alumina.just add some copper powder to your mix to bring it to 2 Cu/2 Ni/1 LiAlH volumes.heat it steady,slowly raising temp.

sarkeizen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1923
He certainly has his informants/pocket scientists.
So?  Ultimately his decision is still based on looking at crappy information which is pretty much the entire LENR field produces.  His being rich doesn't create information. 

profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Sarkeizen:'His being rich doesn't create information.'

His being rich allows ACCESS to information which you and I have never been exposed to.so a few thousand humans pepper the internet with their small anomalous heats and throw them into a few thousand public journals while he gets to see the other thousand that didn't publish because their overunities were too big or too scary.it makes sense 

ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8073
Profitis
perhaps we dedicate a thread to this replication work ?

do you have a specific link for  buildaecat.com



Thx
Chet

sarkeizen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1923
rich allows ACCESS to information which you and I have never been exposed to.
His being rich certainly allows you to fantasize about information that you have never seen. :)
Quote
while he gets to see the other thousand that didn't publish because their overunities were too big or too scary.it makes sense
This has already been discredited in the other thread.  The stronger you make the hidden evidence the less likely it exists. If you have a problem with this I strongly reccommend maths beyond that of a fifth grader. :)

profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
@ramset http://www.buildecat.com/blog_detail/the-chan-formula-4.html and the ecatworld analysis thereof http://www.e-catworld.com/2011/11/22/independant-e-cat-replication-claimed/ .if these links don't open up then you have to google. MgH2 is quite a reversable salt I hear begins to release h2 at around 150 deg c.chan was using electromagnetic a.c. induction aswell as heat but I say nevermind about electromagnetics and just shove heat on it.it will still work.to coat nickel powder with copper-clusters throw nickel into a solution of copper sulfate and add a small bit h2so4,warm slightly if necessary,rinse thoroughly,dry.

profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Sarkeizen:'hidden evidence'

Lugano was hidden?

Vortex1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 518
@vortex you may even want to try your mix in a sealed copper tube(welded shut on both ends) WITHOUT alumina.just add some copper powder to your mix to bring it to 2 Cu/2 Ni/1 LiAlH volumes.heat it steady,slowly raising temp.

Quote
I would suggest adding alumina in powder form to this mix then sealing whole mix in a sealed copper tube(welded shut on both ends).then oil-bath it or resist-heat it and compare to a dummy.this way would rule out leaks at least(h2 won't go thru copper)use small coppertube and small amounts of mix to minimize damage incase of explosion.(put perspex plastic sheet between the experiment and yourself).I'm getting this idea from a guy called chan from buildaecat.com who did this but used MgH2/nickel/copper/iron powder in a sealed copper tube and claimed excess heat for days on end in his oilbath at around 200degrees c.I've got plenty ideas for other chemical tests but you would have to know your chemistry pretty well in order to chek them out. 

Your suggestions are certainly worthy of test runs, as I said I am not a chemist, and it will take me some time to get up to speed. I appreciate your input. If you would like to participate in this , PM me and we can exchange contact info as well as other info. Forums get derailed all too often.

Regarding the copper tubes, copper melts at 1085 C, I had planned on going to at least 1260 C if necessary, and was considering stainless steel tubing, tube in tube construction so that the welds would be far enough away from the active area that there would be no accidental heating during welding. I don't know if stainless is more or less impervious to hydrogen, but it seems to be what others are using. I will have to research this for lack of experience in this area of hydrogen containment.

Kind Regards
Vortex1

profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
My pleasure mr vortex.

sarkeizen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1923
Sarkeizen:'hidden evidence'

Lugano was hidden?
You are talking about evidence that is not available to you or I.  Ergo it is "hidden".

profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Sarkeizen:'Ergo it is "hidden".'

Lugano was on camera infront my face.I saw lots of energy there.I saw it with my eyes :)

sarkeizen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1923
Lugano was
...either a different argument or irrelevant to the one being argued.  You said that Gates decision was based on super-secret information that almost nobody has access to.  I have already shown the stronger that claim is the less likely it is.  So that point is dead. 



profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Sarkeizen:'You said that Gates decision was based on super-secret information that almost nobody has acces to'

Do you see the word 'only' written in there? Gates has eyes too you know not only ears,he wouldve seen the lugano pixtures

sarkeizen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1923
Sarkeizen:'You said that Gates decision was based on super-secret information that almost nobody has acces to'

Do you see the word 'only' written in there?
You changed your argument.  Glad to see I have you on the run. :) :)  Only two posts to get you scurrying.  Not exactly a record but nice to know.
Quote
Gates has eyes too you know not only ears,he wouldve seen the lugano pixtures
Now were back to my first point that Bill's riches don't create information and the body of information that exists is crap.