Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !  (Read 2224481 times)

Pirate88179

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 8366
Re: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !
« Reply #3045 on: March 28, 2015, 02:41:49 AM »
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5d1GO7rqg6Q

Has John Searl done it?

No, that entire episode was proven to be a huge lie.

Bill

memoryman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 758
Re: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !
« Reply #3046 on: March 28, 2015, 03:28:55 AM »
Lawrence, " (I do not want to argue on the exact meaning of the terms of centripetal and centrifugal force.)" precisely.
There is no possibility of an meaningful idea exchange if there is no agreement on definition of the terms used; the result of using an imaginary force is as imaginary as your "lead-out energy" idea.
You can sow your seeds all you want; they cannot sprout because they are sterile.
After many years of promoting your theory, there is no REAL prototype out there; we know why that is, don't we?

Low-Q

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2847
Re: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !
« Reply #3047 on: March 28, 2015, 07:22:19 PM »
Lawrence, " (I do not want to argue on the exact meaning of the terms of centripetal and centrifugal force.)" precisely.
There is no possibility of an meaningful idea exchange if there is no agreement on definition of the terms used; the result of using an imaginary force is as imaginary as your "lead-out energy" idea.
You can sow your seeds all you want; they cannot sprout because they are sterile.
After many years of promoting your theory, there is no REAL prototype out there; we know why that is, don't we?
It does not help.
Lawrence will continue to post just like nothing has happend, or as no one has tried to correct his crackpot ideas.
He will continue referring to one of his previous posts.
His medical condition, B.T.C.S.W.E.O.U.O.B (Blind To Common Sense With Extreme Over Unity Obsession), makes him the only guy in the world knowing details about a top secret OU design - information that neither the US government or China has been able to access.
The design is no longer top secret. It is a simple design, common to science,explained by science, and proved non-OU.
Do you now understand what's going on in his fantacy world? :-) I bet a million that Lawrence never see, quote or comment this post...


Vidar

MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !
« Reply #3048 on: March 29, 2015, 12:46:03 PM »
An interesting experiment would be to just let Lawrence be for awhile and see what how his posts evolve.  I predict that if such an exercise were conducted, Lawrence would eventually start spamming other threads.

ltseung888

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4363
Re: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !
« Reply #3049 on: March 30, 2015, 04:19:06 AM »
More on Centrifugal force and flying saucer design.


Both USA and China are much more advanced.  But the basic concept or physics remains...


Lawrence Tseung
see reply 3038

Pirate88179

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 8366
Re: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !
« Reply #3050 on: March 30, 2015, 04:40:54 AM »
Here is an oldie but goodie from the past ( 7 years ago) when Lawrence was trying to get us to believe this same stuff.

Bill

Low-Q

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2847
Re: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !
« Reply #3051 on: March 30, 2015, 09:05:34 AM »
An interesting experiment would be to just let Lawrence be for awhile and see what how his posts evolve.  I predict that if such an exercise were conducted, Lawrence would eventually start spamming other threads.
Abandoning this thread will only cause that the Lawrence-virus will spread to other threads. However, we might ask Stefan Hartman to remove his posts if so should happen. He obviously is wearing blinders and just running his own race, and does not respond to other members. That is pr. definition the same as spamming.


Vidar

MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !
« Reply #3052 on: March 30, 2015, 01:18:33 PM »
I think that it is obvious that Lawrence is as you say just spamming.  He has made it quite obvious that there is no information no matter how certain that will cause him to question his fantastical ideas.  He leaves sanity and reason to others whom he he simply evades.  I think that if he starts spamming other threads again then he should be dealt with in those threads.

Merg

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 438
Re: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !
« Reply #3053 on: March 30, 2015, 01:36:05 PM »
It is interesting to be recalled and noticed that the collision of the ball and cart itself, in this Veljko Milkovic’s demonstration of the pendulum cart, does not dissipate the huge energy.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GuTMYgQDUzs

Newton’s cradle is the right proof for this.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0LnbyjOyEQ8

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d3/Newtons_cradle_animation_book_2.gif

Low-Q

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2847
Re: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !
« Reply #3054 on: March 30, 2015, 02:40:41 PM »
It is interesting to be recalled and noticed that the collision of the ball and cart itself, in this Veljko Milkovic’s demonstration of the pendulum cart, does not dissipate the huge energy.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GuTMYgQDUzs

Newton’s cradle is the right proof for this.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0LnbyjOyEQ8

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d3/Newtons_cradle_animation_book_2.gif
The sudden impact on the acrylic wall absorbs much of the kinetic energy in the ball,
at the same time as the cart yaws sideways because the ball hits the wall off center.
That makes the rolling ball experiment less efficient than the pendulum experiment.


Vidar

ltseung888

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4363
Re: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !
« Reply #3055 on: March 31, 2015, 05:09:22 AM »
It is interesting to be recalled and noticed that the collision of the ball and cart itself, in this Veljko Milkovic’s demonstration of the pendulum cart, does not dissipate the huge energy.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GuTMYgQDUzs

Newton’s cradle is the right proof for this.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0LnbyjOyEQ8

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d3/Newtons_cradle_animation_book_2.gif


If we have 4 "boards" as shown in reply 3035, we may be able to have a stable Flying Saucer.  Milkovic has done much good work.  He should have realized that the unbalanced Wheel is a super set of the simple pendulum.


The Unbalanced cylinder is a super set of the Unbalanced Wheel.   The Tsinghua University Energy Multiplier is no hoax...

ltseung888

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4363
Re: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !
« Reply #3056 on: March 31, 2015, 05:16:22 AM »
All this talk of  flywheels reminds me of Eric Lathwaite. Also, a very interesting small square plywood board. It had motors with flywheels mounted north, south east and west, all rotating as one might imagine. The entire board is then forced to rotate and an upward thrust is a generated.

No fancy physics here, just processional forces adding up coherently. But it is an idea which deserves more development.


Is a flying saucer fancy physics?

Should China and USA Military disclose their top secret.  The top secret will wipe out all known warplanes, missiles and star war defenses.

Paul-R

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2086
Re: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !
« Reply #3057 on: March 31, 2015, 01:53:11 PM »

If we have 4 "boards" as shown in reply 3035,

3035?
.

Low-Q

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2847
Re: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !
« Reply #3058 on: March 31, 2015, 10:55:04 PM »
3035?
.
Yes. the post from memoryman. Lawrence is stuck in a flying saucer in a fifth dimension. So he see post 3035 as one of his own...

ltseung888

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4363
Re: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !
« Reply #3059 on: April 02, 2015, 03:22:07 AM »
Different ways of flying or lifting off.

1. Rocket style is vertical.  Use external rocket to send payload to space.
2. Normal planes have thrust to weight ratio less than one.  They need to fly at a low angle.
3. The helicopter style is to use aerodynamic lift on the rotor blades.  It cannot fly in space where there is no air.
4.  The flying saucer can go in a spiral path using centrifugal force.  It can use thrust to weight ratio less than 1.  It can also fly in space.  It may appear to be stationary similar to a helicopter.

QMOGENs can lead-out gravitational, magnetic or electromagnetic energy.  Such energy can be replenished anywhere in space.

Should such a powerful technology be kept as Top Secret by China and USA?

Lawrence Tseung
see reply 3038