Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Howard Johnson Replication Tube Claim  (Read 1191746 times)

nyctuber

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 557
Re: Howard Johnson Replication Tube Claim
« Reply #2460 on: May 02, 2009, 07:02:11 PM »
Yea, you're sorry alright.. ::)  Yea.. I just talked a bunch of crap and drove him away and ruining it for everyone else..hmm Sorry..

What drove Mylow away was a repeated request on youtube to 'please let Sterling see your motor.' Account deleted after that, after complaints of personal attack. Just so you know the facts.

PaulLowrance

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2483
    • Global Free Energy
Re: Howard Johnson Replication Tube Claim
« Reply #2461 on: May 02, 2009, 07:02:55 PM »
Mylow doesn't owe nobody nothing...
Agreed, but I'm not disputing that. Your statement goes without saying. Fact still remains, mylow has shown no evidence unless you consider youtube video as evidence. All of this attention mylow has received should not exist.


Get that through your thick lumps on top of your neck.
Sorry, I refuse to return your Ad hominem.

PL

WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3141
Re: Howard Johnson Replication Tube Claim
« Reply #2462 on: May 02, 2009, 07:18:04 PM »
Here's where the SEC (and all other electrical "OU" devices) fail: the energy in is always greater than the (useful) energy out, when the power is properly integrated over the temporal waveform. This is the real reason that these devices cannot "close the loop".
funny, i've watched all your youtube videos, most of them several times. i missed the one(s) where you debunk stiffler's circuit. could you kindly point me to those?
i don't recall you posting anything of substance in stiffler's thread either. i could be wrong. it's a long thread with a lot of talking heads, i could have easily missed your posts. maybe you're one of those lurkers on the thread like myself that doesn't really want to play the with grumpy bear that stiffler sometimes is, i don't know. i am however quite interested in comparing your data on the SEC to what stiffler has shown, that is if you have any data...

billmehess

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 359
Re: Howard Johnson Replication Tube Claim
« Reply #2463 on: May 02, 2009, 09:36:40 PM »
Mylow
Would you please place the device on the floor and pan out with your camera to show at least 24" around the motor. Seems like a sensible and reasonable request.

petrov2500

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 4
Re: Howard Johnson Replication Tube Claim
« Reply #2464 on: May 02, 2009, 09:53:00 PM »
Quote
Mylow
Would you please place the device on the floor and pan out with your camera to show at least 24" around the motor. Seems like a sensible and reasonable request.

Better yet, do it outside on the pavement, clear of any other objects. He should walk around the device with his camera so show all sides. Mylow should also show the device's parts in the same video that he makes it run. It should be clear that the same parts he shows us make the device run, so the parts should be visible throughout the video.

fleubis

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 32
Re: Howard Johnson Replication Tube Claim
« Reply #2465 on: May 02, 2009, 10:01:04 PM »
Mylow
Would you please place the device on the floor and pan out with your camera to show at least 24" around the motor. Seems like a sensible and reasonable request.

Guess nobody has noticed that Mylow has closed in ProjectMagma YouTube account. Glad we have those backup videos.

Digjam

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 77
Re: Howard Johnson Replication Tube Claim
« Reply #2466 on: May 02, 2009, 10:14:33 PM »
Guess nobody has noticed that Mylow has closed in ProjectMagma YouTube account. Glad we have those backup videos.
Yeah, Last time it was the MIB.
This time it's because of rude people.

Have no fear though, he craves attention,
so he will be back with yet another account on
youtube. Just give it a few days.

Next time will probably be a completely different
design that of course runs the first try.
And everything will be great until someone wants
to verify it.

BEP

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 1289
Re: Howard Johnson Replication Tube Claim
« Reply #2467 on: May 02, 2009, 10:39:31 PM »
MyLOW aside, since the replicators seem to be reading this thread, I'd like to repeat an earlier question/challenge: Has anyone, with ANY magnet arrangement on a MyLOW/HJ disk, been able to show a longer rundown time  WITH magnets than with an equally-weighted disk WITHOUT magnets?

A reasonable question deserves a reasonable answer.

Sorry, I don't have one. Providing a positive result would only add fuel to the fire here.

Besides, {your?} weight, string and pulley idea works better and takes less time.

As for re-magnetizers... The ones for screwdrivers certainly won't change the polarity of a ceramic mag. From what I understand the magnets need to be heated around 1800F before changing the field polarity, if you wish it to be permanent. You can 'recharge' them by applying another magnet. If you want to do a good job you need to whack the drained magnet while it is stuck to the good one.
I wouldn't whack a ceramic very hard.

Pirate88179

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 8366
Re: Howard Johnson Replication Tube Claim
« Reply #2468 on: May 02, 2009, 11:00:35 PM »
@ Sterling:

I totally disagree with your assessment of the Mylow situation.  Nothing anyone has posted on this forum compares with you showing up unannounced at Mylow's place.  If you are keeping score, that is a big one.  While I appreciate that you spent the time and the money to do so, since the visit backfired, and you are blaming us here on OU for Mylow's retreat, let's add a little blame to yourself here.  I have to say, from your bad journalism practices from the beginning, your misrepresentaion of facts where there were no facts, and now your throwing blame around to everyone but you, it is time for you to accept some for yourself.

Many folks here think a magnet motor is possible, another fact you got wrong.  Some still think Mylow's motor really works, most of us do not believe all of the fantastic stories reported my Mylow, and yourself, that have surrounded this entire adventure.  I don't need to repeat them here, we are all too familiar with them.  That is what is the most frustrating to a lot of us.  And now, according to you, it is us over on Overunity.com that have prevented this historic device from being presented to the world?  I find your attitude more than laughable.  I find it equally laughable that you now "threaten" us with your cancelling your account over here.
Well, I for one, say don't let the door hit you in the butt on your way out.

Bill
« Last Edit: May 02, 2009, 11:41:43 PM by Pirate88179 »

broli

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2245
Re: Howard Johnson Replication Tube Claim
« Reply #2469 on: May 03, 2009, 01:12:28 AM »
It's funny how grown men (and maybe women) + internet = kindergarten fights.

It was obvious the skeptics should have been dealt with from the start to avoid this kind of circus. I stated this many times before but in FE there's no room for skepticism there's no such thing as healthy dose of skepticism and there's no belittling other people's ideas.

Help, share, contribute. That is what FE is about. If you can't accept that this community does not welcome you. I'm pretty sure physicsforums.com will gladly accept you. If people here would go with this ideology we would make a lot more progress with a lot less bullshit.

You may call me a radical but that is what it takes to be a true FE researcher. Nothing is impossible and when you can always try to help someone improve his ideas even further. And learn learn learn.

nyctuber

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 557
Re: Howard Johnson Replication Tube Claim
« Reply #2470 on: May 03, 2009, 01:19:40 AM »
@ Sterling:

I totally disagree with your assessment of the Mylow situation.  Nothing anyone has posted on this forum compares with you showing up unannounced at Mylow's place.  If you are keeping score, that is a big one.  While I appreciate that you spent the time and the money to do so, since the visit backfired, and you are blaming us here on OU for Mylow's retreat, let's add a little blame to yourself here.  I have to say, from your bad journalism practices from the beginning, your misrepresentaion of facts where there were no facts, and now your throwing blame around to everyone but you, it is time for you to accept some for yourself.

Many folks here think a magnet motor is possible, another fact you got wrong.  Some still think Mylow's motor really works, most of us do not believe all of the fantastic stories reported my Mylow, and yourself, that have surrounded this entire adventure.  I don't need to repeat them here, we are all too familiar with them.  That is what is the most frustrating to a lot of us.  And now, according to you, it is us over on Overunity.com that have prevented this historic device from being presented to the world?  I find your attitude more than laughable.  I find it equally laughable that you now "threaten" us with your cancelling your account over here.
Well, I for one, say don't let the door hit you in the butt on your way out.

Bill

He has a working motor, 99% of the people all over the world cheer and praise him day and night on Youtube, never lets anyone see it in person, days drag into weeks, his supporters grow tired of the greatest gift to humanity since a nice pair of tits never seeing any third party validation, and Mylow says he's done because he was 'personally attacked.'

Mel Brooks couldn't write a funnier script.

petrov2500

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 4
Re: Howard Johnson Replication Tube Claim
« Reply #2471 on: May 03, 2009, 02:03:13 AM »
Latest News:

http://pesn.com/2009/05/02/9501535_Overunity.com_naysayers_dis_Mylow/

So let's get this straight: Ominous Government agents visit Mylow and warn him not to build his device, but he forges ahead. Some people on this forum (which he does not even have to visit if doesn't want to) say some nasty things and he abandons his project.

nyctuber

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 557
Re: Howard Johnson Replication Tube Claim
« Reply #2472 on: May 03, 2009, 02:06:13 AM »
Latest News:

http://pesn.com/2009/05/02/9501535_Overunity.com_naysayers_dis_Mylow/

So let's get this straight: Ominous Government agents visit Mylow and warn him not to build his device, but he forges ahead. Some people on this forum (which he does not even have to visit if doesn't want to) say some nasty things and he abandons his project.

You left out the part where Sterling meets him in Chicago and Mylow says 'they' took his motor again, only to have it reappear the minute Sterling leaves.

hansvonlieven

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2558
    • Keelytech
Re: Howard Johnson Replication Tube Claim
« Reply #2473 on: May 03, 2009, 02:20:30 AM »
@ Sterling and all defenders of Mylow,
 
 Mylow has presented us with a design for a magnet motor that, according to him, works.
 
 The design is based on an old idea that has never been shown to work and has been unsuccessfully replicated in a myriad of variations for a long time. On top of that various hoaxes have been perpetrated with this type of motor, xpensif and alsetalocin just to mention a couple. Magnet motor claims demonstrably have not a proud history. There are any number of non-working patents that have been issued over the years. Mylow would have to have been aware of this, and also would have to have been aware that it would take more than a video on you-tube to satisfy skeptics.
 
 If that was not enough we get all these obviously idiotic stories of MIB's etc. and him getting miffed every time someone doubts that what is presented is real.
 
 It is about time for Sterling and Mylow to realise that much of the disbelief in the device has been caused by Mylow's behaviour.
 
 There are a number of honest people here in this forum that have spent a lot of money and time to validate Mylow's findings. I contend that Mylow and Sterling do owe these people something.
 
 Get off your high horses and put something up that is more than the bullshit you have been feeding us.
 
 Hans von Lieven

tournamentdan

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 67
Re: Howard Johnson Replication Tube Claim
« Reply #2474 on: May 03, 2009, 02:26:48 AM »
I only have one question about all of this. Why would a NSA agent go to his lawyer first and then to his house? If I was a MIB agent I think the less amount of people that knew that I was going to visit the better. Maybe the MIB wanted to make sure that none of mylow's rights were broken. :-\