Free Energy - Freie Energie - energia libre - OverUnity.com

 Sometimes it seems to me that the rush for the free-energy is similar to the
rush for the gold, for the electricity discovery, for cars, for the atomic bomb,
to space. Etc.  What so common about them is that human don’t realize the
consequences of it’s temporary urge to develop a new technology that
eventually will harm nature and human himself……  Evidently every new product
that 7 billion people on earth need - will eventually will cause much damage.

  I’m not sure how many of you are aware of the “Electromagnetic Pollution” we are
currently experiencing worldwide.  All the electric machines that we are exposing
on a daily basis, are radiating magnetic field, power lines, cell phones, computers,
transformers - wherever they are, bar magnets, motors, radar waves, sonar (in the sea),
light bulbs, radio & TV waves, military applications, satellite communication, cars,
even the outlets at your home (when no instrument is connected) and the list is endless.

  Since the fossil fuel age is about to come to a halt in 15 to 20 years, and the rush for
a new energy source is franticly peruses. Naturally electricity seems to be the cleanest
solution……but maybe not so ?

 The effect of electromagnetism on human and animals is only little known. Only at
very concentrated quantities, like some cell phones and power lines that close to
residence area - are consider to be harmful. But what about worldwide emission ?
Not necessarily in one area but the sum total ? 

 As you know, electromagnetic / magnetic waves are passing non stop through our
bodies, organs and brains, almost wherever we are in our daily lives. Our body itself
works on delicate electromagnetic currents (through the nerve system). Think how little
is needed to interfere and cause an imbalance in such a system.

 Unfortunately modern human always “discover” the damage after the fact……after the rush…
So maybe free energy is not really what we need now ?

Even better yet rangerover444, if you don't like the OU notion because of scientific laws then what about solar for electricity? 

Daniel Nocera, a professor of chemistry at MIT, has developed a catalyst that can generate oxygen from a glass of water by splitting water molecules. The reaction frees hydrogen ions to make hydrogen gas. The catalyst, which is easy and cheap to make, could be used to generate vast amounts of hydrogen using sunlight to power the reactions. The hydrogen can then be burned or run through a fuel cell to generate electricity whenever it's needed, including when the sun isn't shining.

Where is this technology at now?  According to the video it's open source   

Regards,
Paul

A number of years ago at our highschool one particular teacher started
talking about problems of the future, and one was that there would
begin to be problems when human energy usage began to rival
the sun's thermal input in magnitude. He was assuming waste heat was not
convertable back into upgraded energy, which is true from a thermo-
dynamics standpoint. *It is* a a potential future problem, and one that
is much more difficult to solve then where to obtain energy in the first
place. On the other hand if there are Maxwell's Demons then it won't
be a problem. One solution, is to only use solar energy because it produces
an upside limit on available power and trades it off to real estate.
So as Archer Quinn has said; free energy will not eliminate the need for
energy conservation engineering. One problem/solution is to make sure
when free devices are sent to dump at the end of their useful lives that
they turn themselves off automatically so that they don't continue to
generate waste heat. That would be especially true of magnetic motors
which would rather generate constant power independent of load. I would
imagine that electric utilities of the future might then be designed to
distribute "control signals" rather than the energy.

...This is not an uninteresting problem, internet servers are becoming a
larger part of electrical load. I can imagine "free energy" powersupplies
being installed first in computer equipment as the components cannot
to shrunk further and system current goes up to facilitate computer
higher clock rates. Imagine, for instance; wiring a computer server
to a water supply and cooling loop rather then to electricity.

:S:MarkSCoffman
 

There is little possibility of such "problems" as suggested.

What could be worse than continuing to pollute the atmosphere, sea, and land with fossil fuels; and the dangerous and dirty mining practices used to get them...? To the point where the planet cannot come back from the damage and thermal run-away turns most of the world into a wasteland and the rising oceans flood the homes of over 50% of the planet's human population.... Completely destroying the seas' ecosystems with the worst pollution ever imagined, as the waters covers the coastal cities?

This can happen, and will eventually, if something is not done to stop these bastards that insist on us using as much fossil fuels as humanly possible, for as long as they can get away with it.

Home power generation means we all think independently, and take personal responsibility for our power use. I know many peeps who "Live off DC", here in the Florida Keys on their boats and on out-islands. I've helped them design and install combined solar, wind, and gen-set systems. The sun and wind are plentiful here; often enough to run an efficient small fridge/freezer as well as computers, TV's, DVD players, stereos, and lights. These people have come to carefully understand and balance their personal energy usage; in a way that "on grid" people rarely do.  But such systems COST a lot of money up front... So NONE of them would consider them "Free", lemme tell you

So it will be with off-grid home systems utilizing cheap, safe, and clean renewable energy generation from non-conventional technologies. People will pay a lot for the equipment up-front, maybe even take out loans for it.... And buy a system with as small a Wattage output as they can get away with to save on the capital expense. Monthly payments going to either the bank or the power companies make little difference when writing checks ... But at least it will stop funding those who have proven they are the enemies of the planet.

The idea we will just eliminate one problem (fossil fuels) for another is without merit.... What is the complaint again, that we will create more EMF pollution? Not valid. Power grids are by FAR the greatest threat for this. As was previously suggested, EMF will continue to radiate us no matter what power source is used... At least with home power generation we can partially control this ourselves and not just be victims with no options. 

Or the worry that we will somehow use more power than presently? No proof of that; and evidence with existing alternative energy systems points to using much LESS through greater awareness, and because of the max Wattage limits of the home systems... And if the power generation is cheap, clean and safe...? Who really cares anyway as the present dangers of doing so, pollution and "scarcity", are eliminated? We live in a society now that has run totally amok with "Consumerism" (..pushed on us imo as another means of control via propaganda and social engineering by these same enemies who hold us in thrall to their energy)... How could this possibly be made any worse.. When so many millions of Americans have gone to their max limits on credit cards buying mainly useless crap already lol?

The main "problem" will be, is that the sociopaths who now control our entire society through illegal monopolies and manipulation, and who levee a secret tax on us all for the cost of energy (higher than any tax levied by a REAL government), will soon be out of power once their strangle-hold on energy has ended... And once that happens, they lose the protection of all the politicians sitting in their pockets now, and suddenly they will be "naked" and exposed to prosecution for their Anti-Trust, price fixing, and Stock Fraud crimes (not to mention their illegal and immoral world-wide polluting and corruption, as Royal Dutch Shell Oil was forced to pay regarding Nigeria, just this week). They will then have to run for it.. Lol, "Paraguay" will be too small a place for these people to hide in once all their crimes are exposed

I guess some peeps don't like that idea. They can go to the "Underunity / Coal and Oil Forever" forum sites, and talk about it there then, lol... Because they are not going to get much interest here for their discredited concepts of:

"Continue the path of failure, and blindly walking towards certain impending disaster... Because it's better than risking anything new at all, or having to think for ourselves".

.. OR...

"Just keep on paying us for your energy, we order it! Bad things will happen to you if you try to stop!"

Lol, these may work on frightened little "sheeple" but they are not gonna get much traction here

We need to understand that they are not going to release these hidden technologies on their own.. There is too much money to be made by remaining on the present path. WE WILL HAVE TO MAKE THEM DO IT; by "re-inventing" these techs (really more a case of bringing them out from the darkness into the light), proving them, and making the public aware of their existence... Until it becomes too dangerous and uncomfortable for these selfish liars to continue ignoring the elephant in the room, continue pretending that these important and history-changing technologies don't exist.

But we can do so: Our chances of success are very good and getting better every day... They are in trouble now, and they know it... Their denials are beginning to look silly and more and more people every day are waking up and refusing to blindly trust them. WE WILL see a world in our lifetimes that turns from the path of destruction, indifference, and greed; to one of sanity and concern for our childrens' and grandchildrens' future.

We must tell our friends, co-workers, family, and neighbors about these concepts. The more who know the truth, and who realize that the suppression and ignoring by mainstream science have gone on for decades beyond reason, the sooner the lies and control via their strangle-hold on energy will end. When we reach the goal of "100 Million people world-wide" aware of the real possibilities of clean, safe, and cheap energy production; it then goes "supernova" and we will break the chains forever. This goal of much greater Public Awareness is attainable; it can be done... And it will be done... Despite those who would vainly try to stop it by convincing us to quit on our own.

... It being the only tactic left to them against an effective world-wide Open Source community; and the growing Grass Roots movement for releasing these technologies for open and honest study

Going back to the Stone Age is a bad idea, doing so will reduce a races survivability rate dramatically, that race will not be able to survive natural holocausts such as leaving their own planet if their star begins to die, would not be able to stop an Asteroid extinction, would have no clue of impending hurricanes, tornadoes, floods, cures for diseases, medical care, no communications would leave local areas blind to invasions from other countries, there are so many bad things that would occur when your survivability decreases, sure technology is still young and requires a lot of research to make it more efficient but it has its place, if we have another ice age it will be technology that will increase our ability to survive where other species will perish. if America was to suddenly give up on Technology forever it would be invaded by countries that had superior war technology, it would be like the British with guns going in and fighting natives with spears and arrows all over again, I would rather have a machine gun in my hand than a rock to throw to protect my family. also, what if a race of beings out of some random blue found Earth and decided to enslave all of man kind and we were stuck in the middle ages, that's not good at all.

I could probably write a good book on this subject but I am not interested in doing so at the moment.

Jerry

While I think its good to have a lot of options on the table.I think we as a nation and as individuals should be hellbent on going solar.If you build solar hot air heaters to heat your house in the winter.You can build them cheap enough (and good enough to last 50 years).You can also realize an instant benefit in fuel savings the very same day you install them.I think making electricity with solar is great too but there those who say its a waste of silicon to do so.I guess I'm saying use solar heat more and don't focus on electricity being the only good thing to come out of solar.OU is fine but we are not using solar to it's max potential.Triffid

I really want to use my invention to power rockets using the sun's fusion power to go to mars and other planets.It would be good to use the suns fusion to heat up gases and liquid fuels to power our expansion into the solar system.Triffid

It really seems up to the individual to make the hard choices.I once worked with a guy who was developing a hydrogen powered car .He said he drove it 10 miles using just hydrogen.I asked him why did he quit.He told me he got a letter in the mail,unsigned with no return address stating that if he continued working on the car that the lives of his family would be at risk.I had no reason to believe he lied to me.The guy was a great mechanic and was very proud of what he had done.But that letter was very sobering.Triffid