Wattsup this guy is a sham. He pours through previous posts and uses them to make himself look in the know. He does this all over in fact he has a self made organization that is only a troll collective. They sit around a main guy like TheBuzz and collectively yank his.. Well you know...


 He is not gonna be any help here. In fact I think I'll be going into my own world and stopping all communication with everyone. I have given enough I guess and was only here to bounce ideas off other like minded individuals. Thanks for sharing your side Wattsup.. Hope you find the real device eventually. I think I am close... We will see...

A radiant energy spike has every frequency in it. But it is generated by ..... not a hv source......  think..

@ Zeitsmachine
Quote from the picture " two capacitors are charged to High voltage and then discharged through spark gap".
I don't think they are charged this way.Look, only one terminal of each capacitor is connected to HV transformer secondary.How can you charge capacitor, coccecting only one side of it to HV source?
I think there is another mechanism here.Two capacitors act like barier to prevent conduction current flowing in the "stout bar", and wasting your HV dipole source, what is happening- charge ( or potential) alternations that happens on transformer side of capacitors plates - by displacement current inside capacitors- cause potential alternations on the other capacitor plates, consequently potential difference along stout bar.If you have potential difference- then you have a dipole within copper bar- and this results in current flow.
I think that a spark gap here is just a "safety device". If you happen to have resonant alternations in secondary of HV transformer ( that behaves like transmission line ) , then voltages could raise out of control destroying transformer.
Pattern of voltage nodes on the stout bar depends of the alternations frequency.
I still think of "hairpin" mechanical equivalent would be a pipe closed on the both sides by elastic membranes.If you drive those membranes simultanously and  symmetrically, then you will have an alternating gas movement within that pipe.
What do you think?
Regards,
Pix

Uh huh... Yeah, like I said - a bloody face, 4 pots of coffee, 2 packs of Camels and fuck yeah! Weed! I'm just saying...

\
 
Are you on the drugs?

The spark gap in the fish tank video if that is what you are referring to is a safety spark gap that bleeds off excess charge to the necessary ground wire.

This is strange. Because in the tin can video there is obviously no such (10Hz) safety spark gap that bleeds off something.

As far as hearing it on his green box video, if you were standing there, you would hear it slightly but the higher the frequency, the less you hear it. I can barely hear mine running at 20khz.

This is the aquarium II video. If there is a hidden second spark gap running at 20kHz (or higher) then why has TK decided to hide it?

As far as the Hempel demonstration, I am not aware of that demonstration but shoot me a link and I will have a look. You can get the effect lots of different ways. The gray tube is a hairpin in a can for example.

The link was one page (17 posts) ago: Freie Energie "Kalter Strom" Präsentation (the German language experiment video)

EDIT - If you use a fast IGBT you can get the effect at any voltage to some degree. A spark gap is a good method if you are using high voltage for obvious reasons. I demonstrated it here roughly a year ago using some little silicone transistors with a row of ferrites. Banned right after that.

Banned because it worked? Then try to demonstrate it a second time.

1. If you are talking about the tin can video where Kapanadze has it in a green rounded can on a white sheet, you assume you can see through steel?

Can't remember seeing any green rounded can on a white sheet made of steel in a TK video.

But if so, I assume I can hear through steel.

2. You are apparently not bright enough to know the difference between hiding something and shielding something. Did you think the big brass box on top of the fish tank is a coin slot / dollar changer?

No idea. Could you kindly supply a photograph of that box?

3. If you think OU cap charging is something new, then you are new.

Yes, I'm new to this. (Thanks to the mainstream media blackout )

It takes nothing more than two caps and a battery to destroy second law at a basic level.

Not even a spark gap?

The answers were all posted by DOLE and others. That is why this thread has gone on for so long - to bury it.

Then maybe their argumentation was not powerful enough, so it has been overlooked.

Consider yourself vetted.

I consider myself on the right track. And I consider this thread as stirred up like a hornet's nest.

BTW: Who is who in this forum?? I gradually lose track of this.

@TheBuzz

Just for the record, as for spending my time,  I work all day (with some days off) and OU all night (and some days), like any normal person with a passion. Not for patenting, not for business (I already have that and is going well), not for suppression, not for disinformation (although we all may risk this every time we post an idea), but just to try and move forward . So please do not try to paint me with such a brush again because you do not have the monopoly on nasty.
 
As for the.....
Quote
Getting people to disclose specifics is the name of the game for the spooks - that changes the game. 
Unquote

Man, you just summarized your reason for being here in one sentence. That is scary. So all abstract and no substance is your motto. Thanks alot. Sorry but playing games is not my style.
 
So..... with all your pissing around, there is only one thing to say.....

"May the stench be with you".
 
Guess I only have one other question then......

How are the toilets in heaven?

@Quark 2.01

Displacement current radiates 90 degrees from the direction of the wire and everybody knows that - hence the term "displacement".

So...... prove it. Or show me were this is a proven fact before you shoot off your damn mouth at everyone.

You can call it what you want. It is basically coupling but who has proven it "radiates" 90 degrees off the wire. And how did they prove it "radiates"? Maybe it attracts. Hmmmmm.

But wasting pages here on simple coupling is not useful.

@jbignes5

Despite all our differences (if any), that should not hinder any mutual progress for OU. So, if you let anyone just poke a hole to deflate your Will, my suggestion, just plug it up and keep going.

wattsup

PS: Both @TheBuzz and @Quark 2.01 are now put on notice. You want to post, fine, do it respectfully or get the F out of here otherwise I will do it for you. Last call. You have taken up too many pages on this thread and said NOTHING but "coupling" and a whole slew of insults. Wow, thanks a lot. I ask @TheBuzz to show where the coupling is in any of the TK devices and I just get a major juvenile piss off. That's it for you guys. First and last warning.