Free Energy - Freie Energie - energia libre - OverUnity.com

One thing I would recommend is having a nice short pair
of very thick wires for the current to flow in for efficiency.
Electric Autos often recommend AWG #0 wire. Because
of the resistive losses at high currents. You want a nice
heavy duty (knife) switch as well.

---

Something I notice is that he doesn't specify is pulley sizes
or give part numbers...this is critical info. So despite obvious effort he
can't claim to give complete information. This determans the drive
ratio, plus they need to match the shaft and belt size. We also
could use motor plus generator RPM measurements too. (not the
motor speced RPM given). He seems to be running an RPM step-up
belt ratio in the picture.

The rest is good. One needs the exact alternator plus exact motor
specified. And, don't abuse the motor before getting the device
working. You also may want a no-name deep-cycle discharge
battery to try, in addition to the one specified.

Note that the motor specified is no longer available, plus the
motor specs say it is only 50% efficient. My tendancy would
be to build an electronic commutator for this motor if it uses
brushes and the device works.

:S:MarkSCoffman

@ Tagor,   did you read this :  ?

==============================================

Yeah, I read it twice.  BUT if it was a fake, why did the MIBs (Feds) shut him down & threaten his life?

That guy who claims he can pick up hundreds of watts by placing a loop of wire in front of a microwave dish (horn), probably FLUNKED OUT of Electricity 101.  LOL.  Really, really sad.  If it was that easy everyone in the world would be placing wire loops in the path of microwave dishes & have free juice.  ROFL.

.

It's FREE to the person RECEIVING it.  If I hang a LARGE antenna out in the yard, I am getting FREE juice.  It may be costing somebody else money to TRANSMIT the juice, BUT I am getting it free of charge.  Same with Solar Panels.  It is FREE to me.

Look, if I give you $100 it is FREE to you.  Yes, it will cost me $100, BUT it is FREE to you.

What's free & not free are really BASIC principles that economists learn in Econ 101.

.

Those microwave claims are lame. Nobody with microwave
experience would knowingly put themselves into the path of
a beam powerful enough to activate this motor generator.

But these knot "coil" and scramble wound coil things are symptomatic
of a static electric antenna designed to pickup free electrons rather
then intercept EMF. One way one could decypher that one wasn't
picking up EMF would be to build a non-inductive antenna. Wind 1/2
the coil in one direction and 1/2 in the other direction.

Kind of a discordant note was sounded when he talked about a
permanent magnet alternator...No car has one because that type regulator
requires that one dump the excess energy to create heat. The battery
requires a regulator to not be burnt-out via overcharging. The field
of a normal alternator varies the effective mechanical size of the
alternator to meet current demands. A different better regulator
circuit is available for alternative energy sources when using standard
alternators.

So a permanent magnet alternator only makes sense when you don't
have a battery based load to worry about.

As for the melted wire, I previously told you to use a lower gauge power
wire.

:S:MarkSCoffman

Nobody with microwave experience would knowingly put themselves into the path of
a beam powerful enough to activate this motor generator

Think again, there are people (e.g. Hubbard) who have used Radium to create a "free energy" device. Not reasonable you say. I agree. Fact is, however people do unreasonable things, even when putting themselves into danger - be it because of ignorance or other reasons. Kipper was also one of these "wizards". Hence, if you still want to believe... good luck in hunting a myth.

@gauschor

I'm using the statistics that show a very large number of these rotorverter
type devices seemed to have worked and try to understand why that is.
It a heck of a lot more comfortable position for me to be in, then saying
that, that number of people were frauds or were lieing ect. I not saying
that a certain number of people are not frauds and they would go to great
lengths to convince. But when people start building companies to build and
market these things ect. that is not a least effort fraud.

:S:MarkSCoffman

@ mscoffman

What kind of statistics are you using when you say "that show a very large number of these rotorverter type devices seemed to have worked" ?

Are you basing this on actual independently replicated and tested devices or on what was written about rotoverters or other devices?

I'm not trying to flame you here, I'm just trying to see if you know that there was a valid scientific approach that was replicated tested and verified as a working principle.

The web is full of working OU claims but I find them hard to believe especially when it's written but not replicated and proven by others.

Regards,
Paul