Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

Custom Search

[acidbreaker]

The guys in the CERN are going wrong way 
that is the clue   

[SPP-48]

Just an update for those interested. My motor has been running on the same batteries for 148 hours now, although the voltage is now at 2.38v. I expect it will stop shortly.

I have been trying different capacitor configurations. I now have a bank of 12 x 1000uF 63v in parallel as providing the best results. I found the 1F & 22F caps difficult to evaluate as I could not charge them up with hand spinning the motor. Once the cap was charged with a battery the motor just ran and ran. I stopped it as I realised that it might just as well be connected to a battery.

It's interesting to note in Dingbat's summary that Mike said to use three magnets on the flywheel. For what it?s worth my best results so far were when three magnets* were aligned between the rotor magnets - from the top :  N * S  - N * S -  N * S. Although I still have a reed switch set-up without a relay.

I still need to order the hall IC and relay.
 
Regards

SPP-48

[McGiver30]

I am canadian..Albertain to be exact...what did you need acid?

[helmut]

@SPP-48
Thanks for the replay.
For a moment i was thinking,that you got it working as Mikes Motor and you were
preparing a Video Demonstration,to show us the myrical.
Who knows..perhaps it is a matter of a few days.

Can you please list some information about the Setup of your coil arangement.?
And perhaps some detais too.

My own setup is in rest,because i wait for the Osziloskop to be delivered.
So long every day i see the thread to be informed and i guess,that many do so.

Did you make mesurement about the weight of the Rotor? This might be a important parameter to kalkulate the Power,that was supplied by the system to keep the Rotor moving that long time.

Some ideas i have in mind.
One is,that there must be a simularity to a otto motor. To get the most Power out of the Piston,it ist important to setup the best Time/delay of the Point,that the spark is flashed.
In my opinion is the fashback (from the power out of the Cap) a very signifikant point in the relation between the magnet and the torque.
Perhaps it is easy to prove in your stetup such a adjustment.
Your Batterys do not increase the Voltage.It does not mean,that there are no Elektrons be moved to the Battery.It doese mean,that the voltage level  is not
different enaugh to encrease the tension.

I which much succsess to you. At the end all of us will profit from this research.

Regards from Duisburg

Helmut.
 

[hotspringstrading]

One thing I am woundering is if the vom he used was damaged backfeeding voltage to the circuit.

[sypherios]

Hi Acid

 I am Canadian.

[SPP-48]

@helmut

I gave coil and magnet details in my reply #396 on 2 March.


@all

Can anyone tell me where the Crouzet GN84137100 can be bought from. The only source I have managed to find is Camis in the UK, but they don't seem interested in shipping to Australia.

Cheers

SPP-48

[MeggerMan]

Hi SPP-48,
Try Farnell in the UK, they stock them.
I think they would be OK shipping to Oz.

Rob

[helmut]

@helmut

I gave coil and magnet details in my reply #396 on 2 March.

SPP-48

Thanks for the advise.Seems that i need new Glasses.

Helmut

[SPP-48]

Thanks Meggerman. I will give them a try.

[tonyc]

@all

Can anyone tell me where the Crouzet GN84137100 can be bought from. The only source I have managed to find is Camis in the UK, but they don't seem interested in shipping to Australia.

Hi Spp ,
            It might be worthwhile checking here first, this guy has 52 of the original switch (84131100) that Mike used. They appear to be surplus stock , so possibly at a good price too. The guy is in USA so it is still overseas for us.

http://www.hkinventory.com/public/OfferInventResult.asp?Order=1&pnums=84131100&crit1=&crit2=&category=&product=&keywords=&words=3&country=&postdate=&brand=&crit3=&crit4=0&datecode=

wow thats huge, might be better to just google 84131100 (exactly that no GN or anything ) its the first hit on page, some sort of component tradeing site .
hope this helps

Tony.

[z_p_e]

@all

Can anyone tell me where the Crouzet GN84137100 can be bought from. The only source I have managed to find is Camis in the UK, but they don't seem interested in shipping to Australia.

Hi Spp ,
            It might be worthwhile checking here first, this guy has 52 of the original switch (84131100) that Mike used. They appear to be surplus stock , so possibly at a good price too. The guy is in USA so it is still overseas for us.

http://www.hkinventory.com/public/OfferInventResult.asp?Order=1&pnums=84131100&crit1=&crit2=&category=&product=&keywords=&words=3&country=&postdate=&brand=&crit3=&crit4=0&datecode=

wow thats huge, might be better to just google 84131100 (exactly that no GN or anything ) its the first hit on page, some sort of component tradeing site .
hope this helps

Tony.

Guys,

I've already done the research and given you an alternative back at message #425, but I'll repeat it here for your convenience:

For those looking for the Crouzet 84131100 10A relay Mike ended up using, but are having troubles finding it due to its obsolescence, it looks like the replacement is the 84134100.

It doesn't look like anyone stocks this part though, so I checked the 25A version, the 84134110, and there seems to be plenty of stock.

See http://www.mectronic.com/scripts/mfgpartlist.asp?partno=84134110&mfgid=5804&mfgname=Crouzet&mfg=Crouzet

Aside from being a 25A instead of a 10A, the 84134110 looks to be the same part, and should work well.

http://www.crouzet-usa.com/catalog/gordos/gnssr.pdf

Darren

[hartiberlin]

Hi Guys,
Ben has done a great work on this device and here are his latest findings
with pictures.

Hi All,

Where to start. I am going to load a series of photos in my section
label starting with Fig. 1 and go up from there. It will show the
progression of the motor, where it came from and how it has ended up.

I will all assume the group has a basic understanding of how the SSG
or Bedini Blocking Osc. motor works. My motor is built with 10
alternating N/S/N/S Neo 45 magnets on a small rotor at 36-Degree
intervals.

Basic specifications/parts:

10 magnets
1 Coil, Litz, wound with # 27/44 cotton-covered wire.
1 Transformer Bogen T-725
1 Transistor MPS 8099.
1 FWBR bridge 1N4007's
1 Diode mass 1N4007 X 10, part of RE internal loop.
2 pots 10K 10 Turn
1 "conditioned battery" U1 size, Wall Mart Special.

Conditioned means DEAD by discharging to 1 V repeatedly. This
results in a high impedance primary battery, a large capacitance and
a high potential capacity secondary battery all in package or "Node".

This motor absolutely started off life as a Bedini single ended
device to replicate Mike's motor. I soon became disillusioned but
decided to stay positive and well "geter done" myself.

First as all my previous post showed, I explored the abilities of my
motor, how fast it could run how slow it could and on/at what power
levels. I went from 8,000 rpm where it threw a magnet to 20 rpm at 1
ma DC.

The coil on my motor is very special but not impossible for others to
make, as it is built out of 27 strands of #44 wire, wound in the Litz
configuration. Yes, that is 27 strands of #44 wire which looks to be
smaller than a human hair. Out of the 27 strands, I chose 4 to be
the drive coil and 22 to be the motor coil. Hard on the eyes and
back ringing out those 4. Not easy to do but it can be done. This
also leaves us with a coil that is extremely close coupled, very
powerful magnetically with low hystersis using the Neo magnets. I am
not at all certain this is the only way to do it, I suspect the low
PM field motors would work but Rpm's are a priority here as within
each passage is a burst of Oscillatory action the produces the RE and
more pulses=more RE. My motor at 1200 rpm produces 90,000 RE
pulses/min! Yes, that is 15 pulses/magnet passage, 5 N magnet
passes/rev X 1200 or 75 pulses/rev X 1200=90,000 pulses! A few
pulses here and there just don't hack it in the real world.
Pulses=Power!

Lets start of with basic schematic.

Fig 1. It's been around, works great, no problem. Well it has
problems if used with NEOS but it basically is a real buzzer. Thanks
to John for his insight in making this system available to us. It
had switching speed problems, current problems if used with NEO's,
losses in the core but still a good design. Losses in the base diode
etc. An excellent place to start. Now If I mutilate any schematic,
I am drawing them from memory??bear with me.

Fig. 2 is the Bedini/Cole/Window motor most basic design. It is much
better as it is air core, more open coupled, free running and runs at
relative low rpms on relative low power if used with ceramic magnets
and the correct resistance in the motor base circuit. The use of Neo
magnets induces higher currents in the L2 circuit along with heating
of transistor, high hystersis losses, etc. There is a trade off here
in what to use.

Fig. 3. This was my first step in reducing current in motor with Neo
magnets. As I discovered my motor would run with multi K ohms in the
base circuit of my single ended circuit, I did NOT need the diode in
the base. That is with the MPS 8099. I offer no guarantees with any
other transistor. 8 days of 24 hours a day run time is living proof
of this. It works without it and lowers drain in the circuit. OK
this got rid of excess current in the base.

Fig 4. With a 6 ohm coil, a 30% duty cycle, I still had about 150-
200 ma in the collector circuit when my motor was running. I found
at this time that with the correct resistance, I could adjust my
motor to pulse like heck while the N magnet was passing with VERY
clean 50us pulse on, 100us pulse off, up to 15 times each power
magnet passage and still run. All waveforms if show later will be
collector to ground. THIS REDUCED MY current down to 50-80-ma
average. Still too high. At this time I had a potent RE generator
but it was going everywhere and nowhere at the same time. Even
though, it appeared to be 97-98% efficient like this it was still way
out of the park.

Fig. 4. STEP 2. I added a diode across the coil. Normally this can
be added here or across the transistor but I wanted to keep all that
energy IN the coil area. This is commonly used to short out BACK EMF
and protect the transistor but we do NOT want to protect, we want to
capture the generated back EMF and the RE produced by the multitude
of pulses in the inductor/transistor interface. This DIODE LOWERED
the average current down to where I could run on about 12-18 ma! at
7-800 rpm. AND IS ABSOLUTELY NECESSARY IN THIS CIRCUIT. Curiously,
I could measure current in I-1 of 15 ma and current I-2 would be in
the 45-ma range. There was a ratio of 3/1 circulating currents in
L2/D1 node but there was no way to use them. This ratio will be
found to be VERY important as we go along.

Now we have 1 power node consisting of a funky battery,
inductor/diode system in series with a transistor NPN junction and
return to the battery. A secondary base emitter junction which I
will let die a slow death here due to the high resistance, low
current in it. It might have importance but have not explored it at
this time.

This INTERNAL node (D1/L2 )with all the power being wasted in it was
the key but I was damned if I could figure out a way to get at it. I
tried a third winding, bridge with poor output; I tried large car
ignition coils with limited success and many times thought I was
unity only to be disappointed in the end. In the thousands of
questions I asked my self one answer stood out. What if I could take
part of that series circulating pulsating node RE and back EMF and
steer it back on the battery node? How to do it was the question.
It is a basic low resistance area with the driving coil being only 6
ohms so whatever I did had to be low resistance. I tried switches, I
tried open-ended coils, I tried SCR's Triacs, Diacs, SIDAC's, Voodo
and cursing under my breath and nothing worked.

With some gentle review from Tom Bearden in his letter, I found my
self thinking about nodes. RE nodes, Curentless nodes??..What? no
current? Negative electron flow, my mind got to flail away at a
seeming impossible problem. That damn battery/Cap/RE regenerator node
had its grip on me and I had to find a way to channel some of this RE
back on itself. My motor was Soooooo close, all I needed was .1% of
SOME kind of energy to kick it over the top. I knew that
conventional systems with their closed loop just DID NOT WORK. Lentz
law/effect saw to that?. Pure regeneration from a generator action
will NEVER work. Depression, lack of sleep, mind in hyperdrive and
lets try this, lets try that lets try impedance matching instead of
current or voltage. Let's try a LINE matching transformer. A
transformer it is but with a twist. I won't go into its theory just
let's say it passes RE like a champ. Here is the final Multi Node
representation of the motor in:

Fig 4. Notice there are 3 basic major nodes and 1 sub node,
unexplored. Loop 1-4. Loop 1 is the basic normal motor node, real
voltage and real current. Loop 2 is an internal node/loop, lots of
voltage, lots of current and lots of RE if my basic theory is
correct. REMEMBER all this is a bunch of theories I have from
observation. I do NOT know them to be facts. Then there is Loop 3,
The weird one! We will first discuss what I can measure and what I
can not and what effects are noticed. Then I will discuss the
circuit. There is a DC potential developed in this node referenced
to ground that varies from basically the battery voltage up to 150
volts depending on the loading resistance in the feedback loop.
Right now I have approximately 3000 ohms in series with the output.
I measure .210 V drop across that resistor which also results in a
measured .00007 amp (.07 ma) which is almost 1.47 millawatts! power
output or drain back into the central battery node. This definitely
will NOT move mountains! BUT when I connect this node back to the
central node/ battery the motor responds as if it was about a 10 ma
boost in current and appears to ignore the resistor. Without the
node, I was running 15 ma in the motor and 750-RPM. 45 ma in Node or
Loop 2. WITH THE NODE connected, I can drop the current in Loop 1 to
5.5 ma, Loop 2 node current is now about 16 ma (ratio of 3/1), loop 3
real current .07 ma, RPM 1200! And voltage constantly rises in the
central node/battery! About 1-3 mv every 15-min until some point is
reached I assume, I have not reached it yet. It has risen all day.
Also adjusting the resistor in Loop 3 DOES NOT EFFECT CURRENT IN LOOP
1 or two or motor speed! Motor loading does NOT effect Loop 3,2 or 1
except as it slows down the current goes DOWN. There is obviously
something going on in loop 3 that does NOT show up on normal metering
devices but it does show up in output of MOTOR! MOTOR RUNS FASTER
WITH LOOP 3 connected but draws less current in LOOP 1 by a factor of
2/3! I assume that there is some form of power flowing there that is
non-conventional. I hate that word assumes! But that's the way it
is.

OK, lets get down to the meat of the question. Here is the final
schematic.

Fig. 5.

A couple things should be noted. T-1 is a Bogen T-725 matching
transformer. Many more wires and combinations are available, These
are simply the ones I chose for maximum output and minimum loss in
the motor circuit. Notice all the diodes across L1-B and T-1. I
found that as I increased the diode count, the current in the loop
went up until I reached about 10 diodes then it leveled off.
Anything to increase the internal loop current. I have found that
the 10 UF cap across the FWBR is not needed and tends to slow down
the loop control. It works just fine without it. P-1 and P-2 are
10K 10 turn pots. I think P1 is about 2.2 K but that is just a guess
right now. Lower the resistance to start motor, increase as far as
possible to lower current in loop 1 while still maintaining RPM's.
P2 can be set anywhere from a dead short to 10 K, 2-3 K seems best
for positive charging in loop. To effectively monitor the battery,
you have to be able to measure 1-mv changes in the system. Without
that, you are in the dark. P-2 does not seem to effect motor speed
except when connected back to battery Positive then magic happens!
Its really simple, the devil is in the details. All diodes are
1N4007's single transistor, what more can I say.

I'm going to watch American Idol now.....I'm gone.

Enjoy
Ben

[hartiberlin]

Here are a few more pics from Ben.

[hartiberlin]

Some more pics from Ben: