Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

Custom Search

[Jdo300]

Hi Everybody,

I can see that there is quite a buzz going on here concerning Al's device! I have finished the 3D CAD model and am currently making some dimensioned drawings for those of us who don't have AutoCAD or a CNC machine laying around. For those of us who do, I will be posting the CAD files as I said before.

I am still waiting to get confirmation about the diameter of the rotor disk. I saw the other 3D renderings that were posted and they look nice but if you take a look at the slots in the rotor disk, they look the same as the drawing that I labeled incorrect. I'm just about ready to post the drawings but I need to know which image is correct. (for those of you wondering what I'm referring to, here's a link to my post earlier in this thread):

http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,3871.msg68313.html#msg68313

The sooner I can get this straightened out, the sooner I can post the information.

God Bless,
Jason O

[Omnibus]

@rotorhead,

This is not a deterioration of the discussion.On the contrary. The analysis I'm referring to is the first scientifically sound analysis proving violation of CoE.It has to be reminded every time when the word is about machines such as this one because the understanding which is vigorously pushed, including by someone who isn't so versed scientifically, such as @alsetalonkin, is that CoE absolutely cannot be violated. It can. That's the basic premise from which every further discussion should follow.

[rotorhead]

@rotorhead,

This is not a deterioration of the discussion.On the contrary. The analysis I'm referring to is the first scientifically sound analysis proving violation of CoE.It has to be reminded every time when the word is about machines such as this one because the understanding which is vigorously pushed, including by someone who isn't so versed scientifically, such as @alsetalonkin, is that CoE absolutely cannot be violated. It can. That's the basic premise from which every further discussion should follow.

And that's the same premise that every scientist you have ever known goes by as well?

[Omnibus]

@rotorhead,

That must be the same premise every true scientist must go by.

[rotorhead]

@rotorhead,

That must be the same premise every true scientist must go by.

So how many true scientists are there? Name some.

[Omnibus]

@rotorhead,

I cannot engage in offering any names. As is usual in science every scientist is personally responsible for his own stance. What I said above is enough.

[sterlinga]

http://www.freeenergynews.com/Directory/MagneticMotors/OC_MPMM/BW - "Contains most of the information relating to the magnetic motor designed by OC and constructed by [Nikolabackwards]. In the text doc 'Judson' you will find the dimensions of the rotor and base plate, ect. I believe you have some of this information already, but some is missing. I am also going to work up a set of AutoCad Drawings based on this file so my replication will be as close to the original as possible." (Paraphrase; Jan. 6, 2008)

[kevin]

I don't know what Al's logic is with releasing information and then deleting it, but here are some of the photos he deleted from the ning group. I recovered them from my browser cache. Maybe someone has a complete set.

[vipond50]

Group
Take note that the Rotor mags are Round Cylindrical not Square. See "sense jpg" that Kevin put up
B.

[RunningBare]

Group
Take note that the Rotor mags are Round Cylindrical not Square. See "sense jpg" that Kevin put up
B.

Yes, replicate replicate

But I do not believe it will make much difference wether the magnets are cylindrical or square bar, its the pole orientation that matters.