Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

Custom Search

[TheOne]

Okay update from me.

First thing is I do not get involved in bickering or disputes, I am here to replicate and have some fun, so please try and keep the thread on course as such 

Right first thing now the base was finished was to get the RC 3mm Internal Diameter Bearings fitted and the lathe down a Brass shaft.

(http://www.overunity.org.uk/ocpm/oc1.jpg)

As you can see the height is 30mm and the Brass shaft fits perfect.

(http://www.overunity.org.uk/ocpm/oc2.jpg)

Here is the finished Rotor by the way!

(http://www.overunity.org.uk/ocpm/oc3.jpg)

Next is to Press Fit the Brass Shaft into the Rotor, I used a Drill Press stand to achieve this.

(http://www.overunity.org.uk/ocpm/oc4.jpg)

Finally Pop the Rotor into the bearings and screw it up.

(http://www.overunity.org.uk/ocpm/oc5.jpg)

Really please with this Rig as really loose using the 3mm RC bearings.

Now I have just got to wait for the magnets to arrive. I have some 1/4 *1/4 *1/4 Cubes knocking around but not enough, so have ordered some of these as well.

That's my progress report so far, more when the magnets arrive

Have also now updated my site over at http://www.overunity.org.uk

Cheers

Sean.

Nice job! I want a CNC Machine now!!

Mine is coming along, quite less complicated then your and quite not precise lol, my rotor is not perfect.... anyway

Hopefully I will able to show my motor running today with my existing magnet (bigger then the one suggested and the stator magnet using sphere magnet)

[naklaw]

I had to build one too

Some images attached, and a video:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7040941048043834176&hl=en

Well, please advice me on how it is supposed to work

[naklaw]

In the youtube-movie he mentions "magno kinetic judson dampers", what is that supposed to mean ?

Why does he have 3 rotating magnets to begin with since the motor obviously runs better with only one ?

Tomorrow i will buy a smaller bearing so I can move the rotating magnet closer to the rotor.

[FunkyJive]

What a fantastic thought-provoking thread, and a brilliant invention - irrespective of what it may prove or disprove.

I would be very interested to know if degaussing takes place after a period of operation. I've read that the unit will slow after some hours (presumably eventually stopping), and also read that after stopping the unit can be re-started again in the conventional manner. Some have suggested the possibility of core saturation, requiring a period of relaxation, though with no energy required for any such change to take place then would not detract from the very interesting questions this device throws up.

If there's any notable source of energy to explain the rotation of this motor then it must  surely be contained within the flux of the magnets. In other words, a sort of reversal of the means by which the magnets are created in the first place - i.e. enclosure by an energising coil with a high-capacity discharge through the coil to induce a polarising field to the magnet. For myself, clarification on this point alone would establish whether this motor is arguably exhibiting Over-Unity as far as we might appreciate, and absolutely right that experimenters here remain cautious and thoroughly objective before making any such claims of attaining the "holy grail". This is one aspect that inspired me to sign up to this forum 

Now if  this were the case, how could this be allowed  to violate modern scientific understanding and the "Laws of Physics" that suggest that energy can neither be created   or destroyed? I can't help but ponder the possible shift in the time element as potentially the missing component that might one day prove to be the missing link to the Power = Rate of Change  in respect of energy conversion - considered in real-time.

A simple hypothesis to time and relativity is to imagine staring at a large clock, say... on the town-hall wall, with the second hand ticking by. All people staring at the clock would appreciate the seconds ticking by at the same rate - in other words everyone is sharing the same time-space. The ticking of the big clock would also be in synchronicity with the watch on your wrist as much as any other watch.

Now, hop in your imaginary rocket ship and accelerate away from the clock, eventually attaining the speed of light. You look down at the watch on your wrist and.. yup... it's still ticking away at one second intervals just as before, BUT gazing back at that big clock on the wall (through your imaginary super-high strength binoculars that correct for doppler shift   ) reveals that everyone and everything is stood still, and the big clock is no longer ticking. Why? Because you are travelling at the speed of light away from the clock you are in a different time-space, as the image light that you see reflected from the big clock cannot catch up with you and overtake. Nevertheless, all those observing the big clock on the ground continue to move around and observe the passing of time exactly as before, even though to you they look stationary. In other words, they are in a different time space.

Now, should you decelerate your ship to half of the speed of light, then by the same token the big clock on the town-hall wall would appear to be ticking at half-pace, and therein lies the linear relationship of speed of light and time-space.

Without thinking any deeper at this stage (little point for this discussion if OU proves to be unattainable), but might relative time domain and deflection of rotating magnetic fields (which are themselves appreciable as a moving-mass) prove to be the missing ingredient to conventional energy-related equations?

Just maybe, ...I guess 


Best wishes - particularly to all the pioneering experimenters here,

FunkyJive

[TheOne]

Ok here my first pic, its only the rotor

I use 6 magnets since they are too big so I cannot put 8 magnets on a small wheel like that. I also use a skater bearing.

More later...

[skymovingcloud]

Hi all, I'm a newbie on the site, joined up because of this thread, very interesting indeed. My background is in mathematics and software engineering. My take on this is to try and model it with software, but my physics is rusty and not to degree level. So my question is, is anyone else on here aware of others that have tried/started/succeeded in modelling this or something similar? I'm sure it's a massive challenge and probably way out of my league, but ya gotta try. Any links, ideas or references to material would be appreciated.

[FunkyJive]

Hi Skymovingcloud.

Like yourself I'm a newbie here myself, though as your standard of mathematics is good then I'll see if I can encourage my maths-orientated friend and colleague (educated to lecturing standard) to join up and chip in. At-least he may be able to throw in a few algorithms for your to work on, amongst many others here I'm sure.

Tweak factors set aside, good modelling software would doubtless save hours of experimentation to optimise 

All the best,

Funkyjive

[amigo]

Hi all, I'm a newbie on the site, joined up because of this thread, very interesting indeed. My background is in mathematics and software engineering. My take on this is to try and model it with software, but my physics is rusty and not to degree level. So my question is, is anyone else on here aware of others that have tried/started/succeeded in modelling this or something similar? I'm sure it's a massive challenge and probably way out of my league, but ya gotta try. Any links, ideas or references to material would be appreciated.

Funny you say this because past week or so I have been contemplating about a software system that could do physical simulations of magnetic and dynamic interactions between objects. An idea might be to use an existing rigid body dynamics engine (for example ODE, being Open Source) and retrofit it with a magnetic simulation component so that magnets could be added as various bodies in the simulation.

Then I thought, heck there are already 3D applications that contain rigid body dynamics engines built in (for example 3ds max uses Havok and I'm familiar with 3ds max) so why build something from scratch when these applications already provide a real 3D environment to model objects and give them rigid body properties. A (big) task would be the write a plug-in that would simulate magnets and their interactions with other objects. Ideally a simulation with visualization of magnetic lines would be an ultimate goal here.

Of course this is all theoretical for now since I neither have the time nor adequate knowledge to undertake either of the tasks...

[Dyamios]

@skymovingcloud

This is one of the bigger (if not most promising) developments that I've seen here in the past year or so, with the exception of mike's motor which was never successfully replicated.

Seeing as how this motor was just recently disclosed, it will take some time for replications and reports from third parties to become available.

If and when more success reports are disclosed, only then should we put a considerable amount of effort into modeling and discovering what actually causes this apparent physical anomaly. Until then, we can only speculate. After all, it could indeed all be a hoax.

-------------------------------------

Asides from that, does anyone really know how the maker(s) of this motor believe it works, or what their basic premise is based upon?

Thanks!

[skymovingcloud]

Hi Skymovingcloud.

Like yourself I'm a newbie here myself, though as your standard of mathematics is good then I'll see if I can encourage my maths-orientated friend and colleague (educated to lecturing standard) to join up and chip in. At-least he may be able to throw in a few algorithms for your to work on, amongst many others here I'm sure.

Tweak factors set aside, good modelling software would doubtless save hours of experimentation to optimise 

All the best,

Funkyjive

Hi Funkyjive,
sounds great.

Best of luck to the constructors too, looking forward to seeing the results.

Cheers,

Sky