Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

Custom Search

[Goat]

@All

I decided to take the risk and bought the manual a couple of hours ago and am very disappointed 

It's a toy version of the Newman motor 

Ah well, nothing ventured nothing gained, hopefully the real motor isn't a window type motor I'm always willing to forgive and forget!

Regards,
Paul

[smithandwes]

does this mean that the Newman motor is also this efficient......i don't care if it is a copy or similar to another machine...if it saves 95% energy then this is still a good thing?

where do i get details on the Newman motor(or Keppe Motor for that matter).

[Goat]

Hi smithandwes

The Keppe motor manual describes it as a "sample" motor so it's not the real deal as it uses an inefficient switching setup, I can't say much more about it because of the "Terms of use" but I doubt it's 95% efficient

As far as the Newman motor just Google it, it's all over the Internet and there's also a section on this forum under Newman Machines.



Regards,
Paul

[khabe]

http://bearspace.baylor.edu/Walter_Wilcox/www/courses/phy2435/chap29xxb.pdf
http://courses.ece.uiuc.edu/ece110/brunet/lectures/col6.pdf
http://amasci.com/freenrg/fnrg.html

[chessnyt]

Hello everyone,

Just as I thought, the motor in reality is the work of another inventor.  My thanks goes out to Paul for buying the motor manual and checking out the technical information on it.  Great job Paul!  Now more people from this site do not need to buy it or their falsely represented book that they are peddling.

This is yet another example of just how far some people are willing to go to try to make a profit by exploiting the work of other inventors claiming it is their original discovery.
 
As for the “Bling-bling show off with sonorous therms” statement from Khabe, I can assure you I do not wear any “bling-bling” or even listen to hip-hop.  As for “sonorous therms”, I do not even know what you were trying to say there.  Fancy British thermal units? (I’m Irish by-the-way)

As for Will, the Bedini/Cole Window Motor is indeed bipolar as it has a rotor comprised of both North and South facing permanent magnet poles.  I am really not surprised that your technical staff could not provide you with the correct information here as well being they can’t produce an original motor of their own.

I am just an honest working man who still makes a living designing and building original circuitry for a living thus not needing to steal other people’s designs and call them my own just to sell phony books and manuals.  I pride myself on this fact.

Character does matter, Khabe.  So does honesty.  If you feel comfortable defending dishonest men who blatantly take credit for other people’s hard work, then maybe you should buy ten copies of their book to show your support.

Sincerely,

Joe   
 

[khabe]

Let it be. Let they fight between for "all rights" of this machine
Hereby many interesting readings, when braused extending everywhere then even for all week
It does not matter you are believer or sceptic - educative anyway.
http://www.phact.org/e/skeptic/newman.htm
Myself Im fervent_hope_sceptic. I hope that something must to be ... but I dont like much stupidity ... and I hate fraud.
Newman´s, Keppe... etc ... machines are interesting stuff, very interesting things but unfortunately nothing more, at any rate not OU.
Have a nice readings,
khabe

[smithandwes]

Anyone know where i can get the plans/description of the newman motor.  Some people say you only need one coil others say 2.  Some people are using a commutator and others a reed switch.

http://www.overunity.com/newman2 is not very useful?

A real pity about the Keppe Motor..i was hoping for something useful to build?

[khabe]

Seems you want to be come a rich but dont want to work
is it too hard to go to -> Forum -> Newman machines -> http://www.overunity.com/index.php?board=4.0   
If you really want to konw about - you have to read it all.
All !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
regards,
khabe

[stanis]

http://www.keppemotor.com/partslist.php

[appliedbiophysics]

The Keppe Motor DIY manual [Grade D-] is a waste of money. The worst YouTube video is better than this. Shame on them... The STOP organization chants save the world mantra and like most inventors that say they want to save the world but do not share the information, some like Paul Pantone: an angel gave the knowledge to him. E-mail me for a copy of the New Keppe Motor PDF manual.

I think Joseph Newman is really amazed how this Norberto Keppe has the intellectual dishonesty to not give credit due to the sources of the people who have similar interests and ideas. Keppe motor is a Copy of the Newman Motor.

The crackpot humanist psyco-shrink babbel talk, some people suck this up like a sponge. Follow the government grant money.

Ideas are everywhere but it takes actions and effort to make anything happen. The time we have is very short in this life. Saving a condemned   world is hardly an inspiration for an idea.

oregonherbal@yahoo.com
http://sites.google.com/site/appliedbiophysicsresearch/welcome

From the PDF Keppe Motor Manual:

The Keppe Motor’s effect on a candle flame:
Observe the movement of a candle flame inside a longneck glass container that pro-
tects it from the wind approximately 1 meter from a Keppe Motor working at low speed.  (To
achieve low speeds use low voltage batteries).  Stop and start the motor several times and
see how the candle flame moves in accordance with the motor’s movement, even though
the flame is protected.

The Influence of one Keppe Motor on another Keppe Motor
at distance:
If you put two Keppe Motors (whether identical or not) side by side and have one motor
functioning, the other will automatically begin to spin at a speed that corresponds to one of
the “harmonic resonances” of the first one, even though no external power source is in use
on it at all.
If this phenomenon does not occur immediately, it is because the speed of the first mo-
tor is too fast. Use your hand to help spin the second motor until you notice it spinning by
itself. At a certain speed it will work by itself without significantly affecting the speed of the
first one.
This experiment suggests that many Keppe Motors functioning together will create a
resonant energetic field within which each one benefits from the other, increasing each
one’s efficiency even more.

Feeding a Keppe Motor with another Keppe Motor:
When we connect two Keppe Motors, we can demonstrate that both motors working in
tandem will consume less energy than if they were working separately. This means that the
Keppe Motor is capturing energy from space. For example, when there is a series of Keppe
Motors connected by wires, the next in line will always need less energy than the previous
ones to generate the same performance.
To illustrate this, the Keppe Motor development team conducted the following experi-
ment:
We developed two similar Keppe Motors—the first one with a thicker wired coil. We
rectified the current generated by the magnet of the first motor and sent it to a 10,000 µF
70 Volt capacitor, which in turn served as a power source for the second motor.
In measuring the consumption of the motors, we verified that working together we could
produce the same work (axis speed) at less energy consumption (1.5W) than if they oper-
ated separately (2.2W). This indicates that the energy needed to make the motors work
does not come only from the battery.
Below find the data for the experiment:
Separate Motors:
Motor 1: spinning at 3,000 rpm consumed 1.5W
Motor 2: spinning at 1,000 rpm consumed 0.7W
Connecting Motor 2 to Motor 1 through a bridge rectifier and a capacitor, we found:
Motor 1 spinning at 3,000 rpm
 and
Motor 2 spinning at 1,000 rpm
in operation together consumed only 1.5W
In other words, rather than the 2.2W of consumption we might expect (adding 1.5 W
and 0.7W together), the consumption by the battery stayed at 1.5W even with Motor 2
connected!
Conclusion:  There was no extra electrical energy needed to move the second motor.
So where did the energy come from to move it? Not from the battery, but from the second
component of space energy—the returning or “complementation” component of the Essen-
tial Energy. This is exactly what is predicted in Keppe’s New Physics.