Free Energy Alternative ZeroPoint Green Tesla Power Open Source Research Forum OverUnity.com

"Reason for skepticism?"

Indeed. What I'd like to know is just what "reason for credulity" there ever was, in this fairy tale.

This quote from Sterling's report pretty much sums things up:

"Pete was not running the amp meter in series on the input, but in parallel; so the 0.241 amp reading was not accurate, but was low.  An undetermined amount of the input electricity was flowing through the telephone wire, while some (0.241 amps) was flowing through the meter.  Jim Dunn tried to get Pete to run the meter in series so that all the electricity would flow through the meter for a more accurate reading of input current, but Pete never did that while we were there.
(snip)
"Telephone wire nowadays is typically 24 gauge (ref.), which is 0.0201 of an inch in diameter (ref.).  Jim said 24-gauge wire can carry up to 10 amps before it melts.  He uses it as a "poor man's fuse" for some applications.  It could easily carry the 2-4 amps that it would take to soft start up the five motors.  When I asked Pete about this later, he said that the telephone wire was of much smaller gauge than that -- like 60 gauge .  Jim said that telephone wire would never be less than 26 gauge."

And we can see in the photos that the wire looks like standard #24 or #26 plastic-insulated wire. When Pete mentions "60 gauge" wire he clearly has no clue as to what he's talking about. In the other article #44 wire is mentioned--which, based on the demonstration Sterling saw, and the above comment, is most certainly also wrong.

An "electronics technician" hooks an ammeter up in parallel with a power source and a load, somehow doesn't blow the meter's fuse, and then uses the reading to calculate power, and then claims that power is being conveyed in wires finer than a human hair--when photos clearly show much larger wires than that.

It's so stupid it isn't even funny. How can anyone give this clown (Sumaruck, not Sterling!) any credence at all? He should be run out of town on a rail, or made to write "I will not hook my ammeter across the power supply" a hundred times on the blackboard.

There is only one question that we need to ask-----can the small input wires handle the start up amps of all those large AC motors? Let alone all starting at once!  NO---- there is no hope in hell those small wires would handle the amperage required, I know this as a fact from experience. So his magical box is doing something we don't understand, It's funny that there are many people who have such an ego they cannot admit there are things they do not understand. Hopefully we will understand, preferably sooner than later.

The key here is what Sterling stated on post 1.
"output through his modified variable AC motor controller."
Modified how is the question.

Hi all,
2HP el. motor running without load- doesn't mean it takes 2HP load.Induction el. motor without a load takes minimum current,2HP means it is capable to give such load-but then currents are much bigger.It is so simple.
On the video I would rather like to see on the clamp ammeter current IN, current OUT.
But the very BASIC error is to calculate output load as 7,5 HP when 3 el.motors with such name plate RATED power are running without load!
Regards,
pix

@ash

If this guy can show OU with amp/volts in versus amps/volts out, why would you then ask him to run a so so efficient generator. So what type of generator would you recommend? I'd rather want to know what the modification is to the AC control he is using and just check in and out.

Regarding generators, drive motors, etc., I just put up a post that discusses the pitfalls of using these for OU and I was even hoping that you would take a look and provide your comments on what I may have overlooked. It is located here.
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=6116.msg141129#msg141129