Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

User Menu

Tesla Paper

Free Energy Book

Get paid

Donations

Please Donate for the Forum.
Many thanks.
Regards, Stefan.(Admin)

A-Ads

Powerbox

Smartbox

3D Solar

3D Solar Panels

DC2DC converter

Micro JouleThief

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

CCTool

CCTool

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Products

WaterMotor kit

Statistics

  • *Total Members: 84075
  • *Latest: icew4ll

  • *Total Posts: 894636
  • *Total Topics: 15736
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 5
  • *Guests: 10
  • *Total: 15

Author Topic: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011  (Read 612169 times)

Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1395 on: May 25, 2011, 07:10:26 AM »
A question for you Rose on the battery wiring:

The 3.3uH value you provided for each side of the battery, does that include the inductance of the 4 or 5 wire jumpers (depending on a 5 or 6 battery setup) between the batteries, or is that the value only for the long wire (x2) leading from the battery terminal to the perf board?

.99

The last option.  Only for the long wire (x2) leading from the battery to the perf board. 

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy


Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1396 on: May 25, 2011, 07:40:47 AM »
I need to remind you Poynt.99 that this test of ours is replicated on the following variation.  I battery - used - same supply used to generate the charge for the switch - THEREFORE no functions generator - NO long wires on that test - NO grounding issues - same evident zero voltage discharge - and temperature over the iron resistor at 240 degrees which was hot enough to vaporise solder.

It is a benefit that is not CONFINED to our circuit but - self evidently - to any application required to generate heat.  ALSO.  There is no apparent RF interference despite the oscillating frequency.  And please tell Pickle that I always read his posts.  I don't bother to refer to them as a rule because his assumption of my idiocy is marginally more extreme than your own.  If that's possible.  And his comments are invariably entirely irrelevant.  What I do NOT understand is why you need to post a reference to this when and IF your intentions here are to stick to the point.  It seems that you do NOT tire of gratuitous exposure of your cronies' opinion of me.  If you EVER require a public debate then I think that NOW I will require a public retraction of those appalling comments that you've applied to my character and my abilities and my name.  SO.  I guess this debate is hardly likely to happen.

I am DISGUSTED that you saw fit - yet again - to repost one of his highly personalised unscientific comments - which also constitutes a flagrant endorsement of it.  Do you REALLY THINK that I'm about to continue a discussion with you under those circumstances?

Rosemary

Offline happyfunball

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 405
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1397 on: May 25, 2011, 10:37:00 AM »
Good Lord. If the circuit works, then start heating/boiling water and let it run for six months to remove all doubt. 94 pages of utter bull.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1397 on: May 25, 2011, 10:37:00 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline powercat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1091
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1398 on: May 25, 2011, 05:15:44 PM »
Good Lord. If the circuit works, then start heating/boiling water and let it run for six months to remove all doubt. 94 pages of utter bull.

I agree with everything you say, unfortunately Rosie seemed to think saying the same thing over and over again and having arguments is what the world needs.
http://www.youtube.com/results?search_type=videos&search_query=Rosemary+Ainslie+circuit&search_sort=video_date_uploaded&suggested_categories=28&uni=3

Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1399 on: May 26, 2011, 03:22:36 AM »
Guys, I've now had receipt of three more sims - the one without a math result - but otherwise all consistent with Poynty's findings.  I'm in the process of alerting all the academies that I can reach - in England and will then do the same to those in America.

The principle seems to make sense to our academics. There is a wide acknowledgement amongst engineers that if these advantages show up on our simulations then they are most certainly also verifiable experimentally.  The interesting thing is this.  That software is clearly NOT designed to apply Kirchhoff's Laws.  The assumption has been - quite rightly - that IF Kirchhoff's Laws are a natural consequence that also somehow constrain the transfer of energy to the amount of energy first delivered from the supply, then it would be impossible to find more energy dissipated on a circuit than delivered by that supply.

So.  Let's look at what's happening here.  In essence the circuit is designed to generate counter electromotive force.  But unlike usual applications the actual design is such that it does nothing to stop the flow of current resulting from all that negatively induced voltage.  Possibly for the first time - we've actively enabled all that counter clockwise flow of current and, by doing this, we're able to see its full force and effect.  The assumption has always been that this energy must equal the energy from the supply.  It does.  More or less.  In fact, depending on the inductive material in that circuit - rather MORE than less.  But then there should - theoretically - be NO spare energy to heat anything at all.  But it does.  Rather energetically.  In the region of hundreds of watts.  While that same software then ALSO computes the cost of energy from the battery.  And there it concludes that the supply source has lost absolutely NO charge at all.  It effectively cost the battery nothing.  Which makes it INFINITE COP.  Golly.

I may have reason to quarrel with Poynty.  But I will never tire of saying this.  It was thanks to his impeccable skills on PSpice that this was ever disclosed. And where our own demonstration elicited no interest whatsoever - he has, through these skills - 'lit a fire', to paraphrase Sir Walter Raleigh - that is very unlikely to ever go out.  Not that the questions will simply now be resolved.  But because MANY experimentalists and MANY engineers and MANY academics - can now explore the applications and variations and the 'truths' or otherwise - of all this evidence - FOR THEMSELVES.  This is the goal of publication and this is the requirement of all new and emerging technologies.  It has taken away any further need for a 'faithful' or precise replication - to transfer it to an easy powerful tool to explore these and other configurations.  And thereby it allows the actual significance of the technology to be thoroughly and widely explored.

And - in fairness - it is a remarkable tribute to his own intellectual honesty that he's owned to this result.  So.  Poynty.  I have good reason to quarrel with you.  But for this I think the whole world will end up thanking you.  And I'd like to be the first. 

Kindest regards,
Rosie 

And may I add.  The question now is this.  Either there's a 'hidden' supply of energy that has not previously been factored into our energy potentials or there's an error.  And that can only be resolved experimentally.  With a wide ranging interest in this easily tested condition - then that is where this will inevitably move. 

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1399 on: May 26, 2011, 03:22:36 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline poynt99

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 3585
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1400 on: May 26, 2011, 11:36:41 PM »
In order to begin a detailed analysis of the circuit we're discussing, I created a slightly more detailed version of the schematic diagram, as attached in the pdf file.

I increased the battery wire inductance to 3.3uH as requested, and I've separated the lumped wire inductance and resistance out to 3 segments as shown. Electrically, this is equivalent, but allows for flexibility in the measurements and analysis.

The same was done for the batteries and wire jumpers, as shown. I approximated each wire jumper to be about 20 inches in length, each with an inherent inductance of 20nH per inch, hence the 400nH per jumper.

Remember that the resistors and inductors shown representing the RED and BLACK battery wires are not physical discrete components; they are used to represent hidden but inherent values as a consequence of finite wire resistance and parasitic inductance.

Hopefully the labeling is clear and it can be agreed upon that this represents a good starting point for the detailed analysis to follow.

The first entry here is of the schematic ONLY. Scope shots etc. to follow if this diagram is acceptable.

.99

Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1401 on: May 27, 2011, 05:07:37 PM »
Hi Guys,

By Monday I should have sent out the mail shot to most of the English Universities to look at the sims for themselves. 

I'll let you know what the response is as they come in.  I shall be doing the same the American universities soon thereafter. 

I'll also be submitting our paper to the IEEE within the near future.  I'll keep you all posted.

Kind regards,
Rosemary

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1401 on: May 27, 2011, 05:07:37 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline poynt99

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 3585
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1402 on: May 27, 2011, 08:25:46 PM »
The first scope shots establish a baseline measurement of results similar to previous posts.

With the added inductances, the measurements are slightly different, but still show the apparent negative power to the battery. The net average power for the baseline measurement (scope probes in the positions noted) is about -106W.

The relevant nodes in the circuit have been numbered 1 through 7. A notation of V3-2 (VCSR) means the voltage across nodes 3 and 2 with the polarity + and - respectively. V7-4 (VBAT) is the baseline battery voltage measurement.

.99

Offline poynt99

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 3585
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1403 on: May 27, 2011, 08:54:58 PM »
Here are the PSpice 10.5 files for the above detailed analysis simulation of the circuit.

.99

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1403 on: May 27, 2011, 08:54:58 PM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline Pirate88179

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 8366
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1404 on: May 27, 2011, 09:19:41 PM »
Here are the PSpice 10.5 files for the above detailed analysis simulation of the circuit.

.99

I just wanted to take this opportunity to say that I think that Darren (Poynt) has gone out of his way with these PSpice simulations, something he did not have to do.  I, for one, appreciate his efforts as I know they take time, a lot of time.  Thank you Darren for dedicating your time to do this.

Bill

Offline poynt99

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 3585
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1405 on: May 27, 2011, 09:34:39 PM »
Thanks Bill.

It's much appreciated.

.99

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1405 on: May 27, 2011, 09:34:39 PM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1406 on: May 28, 2011, 08:35:25 AM »
I just wanted to take this opportunity to say that I think that Darren (Poynt) has gone out of his way with these PSpice simulations, something he did not have to do.  I, for one, appreciate his efforts as I know they take time, a lot of time.  Thank you Darren for dedicating your time to do this.

Bill

Indeed.  Above and beyond - and considering Poynt's refutation notwithstanding the evidence - then that is a remarkable tribute to his intellectual honesty.  I am reasonably certain that there is no part of this 'unfolding' that sits comfortably with the members here - but it is a fact that this evidence is easily proved on simulation software.  And that is a far easier route to evaluate this 'effect' than evaluation of the experimental apparatus.  There is only one way to measure the energy that is delivered by a supply source.  And that is precisely as is shown in Poynt's schematics.  If that protocol is correct then it points to the fact that there is an alternate energy supply source in standard electric circuitry that has not been fully exploited before now.  And the really extraordinary fact is that this also seems to be sufficiently abundant to generate Infinite COP. 

So Poynty.  Whatever our own contributions - YOURS is considerably more effective, efficient and useable.  I'm also reasonably certain that you wont enjoy my gratitude - but it is, nonetheless, heartfelt and has earned my enduring respect.  If there are hidden errors then I am reasonably certain that this will be exposed through the wide dissemination of your schematics.

I would also like to pay tribute to Stefan.  He has clearly not moved in support of this evidence yet nor has he disallowed these posts of mine.  It speaks to a remarkable tolerance and fair mindedness which it would be as well for other forum owners to emulate.  Because, in essence - it's allowed this knowledge to remain Open Source - and that is where it needs to stay - regardless of it's popularity or otherwise.

I am almost inclined to apologise for the prosaic nature of this new energy - as this run counter to the requirements of both mainstream physics and the more popular concepts of energy that are widely endorsed on these 'free energy' forums.  But there are two points here that need to be understood.  The first is that it is NOT my work - but the work of many, many people associated with both the thinking and the experiment.  I am not about to apologise for their amazing contributions.  And secondly is the fact that it does not CONFLICT with known physical paradigms.  Which is an eloquent endorsement of the amazing insights and achievements of our GREATS.  Never a bad thing.

The thesis depends on Einstein's mass/energy equivalence - and on the possibility that inductive/conductive material is able to generate an electromagnetic energy potential as a result of Faraday's inductive laws.  The results point to the fact that this may, indeed, be correct.  What may now be considered is that the electromagnetic force is a secondary phenomenon and that the magnetic field may, indeed, be a primary force.  If this is correct then it also points to the possibility that the magnetic field itself may comprise magnetic dipolar tachyons that have - thus far - been largely overlooked.  If so - and if the thesis is correct - then it also means that there is a vast abundance of this energy pervading and, indeed, structuring all of space.  I do hope it's correct - because then there is a wealth of potential that is not confined to the electromagnetic force.

And again Poynty Point.  Thank you very much.  But I KNOW that there will be many, many others who will be paying tribute to this excellent work of yours - and I would also put on record - that there may yet be an alternate explanation.

Kindest regards,
Rosemary

Offline poynt99

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 3585
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1407 on: May 28, 2011, 09:28:42 PM »
The schematics and scope shots in this post illustrate the dynamic involved by moving the battery voltage probe from the original nodes V7-4, closer to the battery terminals. In the two additional schematics, the GREEN battery voltage probes are moved progressively to the left along the RED and BLACK "wire components".

This is the only change for each simulation run. What can be observed is the decreasing peak-to-peak swing in "VBAT" voltage, and the resulting decrease in computed negative average wattage in the battery array.

Summary of results thus far:

Original full wire length: -106W
2/3 battery wire length: -77W
1/3 battery wire length: -48.5W

More to come...

.99

Offline poynt99

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 3585
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1408 on: May 29, 2011, 10:23:55 PM »
Continuing with the battery voltage probe placement closer and closer to the battery array, the results continue to show a declining negative average power in the battery array.

The first test run in this installment is with the voltage probes placed across the battery array and CSR (V1-3), completely eliminating the long battery wire leads. The power computation comes to -20W.

The second test run is with the battery voltage probes across nodes (V1-2), which eliminates the voltage across the CSR, and is therefore directly across the battery array and the associated battery jumper wires. This power computation comes to -17.5W.

More to follow.

.99

Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #1409 on: May 30, 2011, 12:24:07 AM »
Continuing with the battery voltage probe placement closer and closer to the battery array, the results continue to show a declining negative average power in the battery array.

The first test run in this installment is with the voltage probes placed across the battery array and CSR (V1-3), completely eliminating the long battery wire leads. The power computation comes to -20W.

The second test run is with the battery voltage probes across nodes (V1-2), which eliminates the voltage across the CSR, and is therefore directly across the battery array and the associated battery jumper wires. This power computation comes to -17.5W.

More to follow.

.99

lol  How does one get a wattage value without the computation of current?

 

OneLink