Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

User Menu

Tesla Paper

Free Energy Book

Get paid

Donations

Please Donate for the Forum.
Many thanks.
Regards, Stefan.(Admin)

A-Ads

Powerbox

Smartbox

3D Solar

3D Solar Panels

DC2DC converter

Micro JouleThief

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

CCTool

CCTool

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Products

WaterMotor kit

Statistics


  • *Total Posts: 521743
  • *Total Topics: 15549
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 6
  • *Guests: 12
  • *Total: 18

Author Topic: Testing the TK Tar Baby  (Read 1457939 times)

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #4230 on: July 21, 2012, 07:24:45 AM »
Don't forget... last year she went for a solid MONTH, over 400 posts, deliberately misleading everyone about the schematic they claimed to use in the video demo that she denied posting to her own YT account. And just a few days ago she bemoaned the fact that she and .99 couldn't have kept it under wraps for even longer. .99's "rather unfortunate" publication of the correct schematic... at least correct for THAT DEMO... upset her duplicitous applecart, though.

There is absolutely no telling how she had things hooked up, for any trial except those where we can see actual photographs of the apparatus. SHE CAN'T EVEN READ a schematic today. And after all this... especially the demo, where one schematic was shown in the video (incorrect, a single mosfet and no FG black lead), another described in the video ( all 5 in parallel), two more given in the "papers" describing the demonstration's trials, and a fifth one finally shown to be used, by .99...... after all that, and her express admission that she deliberately wanted to keep that schematic secret..... how can anyone believe anything she says about schematics and what was used when?

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #4230 on: July 21, 2012, 07:24:45 AM »

Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #4231 on: July 21, 2012, 07:30:14 AM »
Don't forget... last year she went for a solid MONTH, over 400 posts, deliberately misleading everyone about the schematic they claimed to use in the video demo that she denied posting to her own YT account. And just a few days ago she bemoaned the fact that she and .99 couldn't have kept it under wraps for even longer. .99's "rather unfortunate" publication of the correct schematic... at least correct for THAT DEMO... upset her duplicitous applecart, though.

There is absolutely no telling how she had things hooked up, for any trial except those where we can see actual photographs of the apparatus. SHE CAN'T EVEN READ a schematic today. And after all this... especially the demo, where one schematic was shown in the video (incorrect, a single mosfet and no FG black lead), another described in the video ( all 5 in parallel), two more given in the "papers" describing the demonstration's trials, and a fifth one finally shown to be used, by .99...... after all that, and her express admission that she deliberately wanted to keep that schematic secret..... how can anyone believe anything she says about schematics and what was used when?

Indeed - TK.  I was MOST anxious to prevent either you or FTC from stealing this as is your wont.  SADLY it didn't work.  You've attempted to appropriate this as your own work - and as expected.  And like FTC you're also trying to trivialise the numbers.  And sadly - there's nothing I can do to stop you short of those demonstrations.  Then you'll need to learn to sing to another tune.  Or you'll need to be very busy decrying the evidence in spite of that evidence.  Can't wait.  My apparatus will be back on MONDAY.  And then it's ready - set - go.  How nice is that?

Rosie Posie

ADDED
AND TODAY IS OUR WINTER EQUINOX.  THINGS CAN ONLY GET BETTER HERE IN THE SOUTHERN HEMISPHERE.  A NICE OMEN FOR US.  Not so good for you TK - picowatt - Sean - Mookie - The boss - and the rest.  I believe you're moving into a winter.  I trust it will only give you all a great deal of 'discontent'.

R



Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #4232 on: July 21, 2012, 07:53:02 AM »
 
Yes it's hard to believe.  If you push 10 quarters in at one end then DOWN THAT LINE ten quarters need to be replaced - one, by one, by one.  No other way to complete that journey.  And that speed is NOT at light speed.  It is measurably SLOWER.  That's NOT my argument.  That's our EXPERTS.  And they really do know how to measure this. So.  If you choose to believe this - then, frankly, you're on your own.  But feel free.  No-one is prescribing beliefs.  It's just that belief has nothing to do with science.
YES INDEED.  We've measured it in both our COP>17 tests and in our NERD circuits.  And we've reconciled it with the mass size ratio of the proton to the electron.  We've argued it as a field - and we've used self-consistent arguments THROUGHOUT.

added
Here's the multiple proof...
It reconciles the mass size ratio of the proton to the electron
It reconciles the Casimir effect
It reconciles the gravitational force
It answers to the requirement of missing matter measured by our astrophysicists
It conforms to the non-standard properties of the Higgs Boson
It reconciles all the forces
It conforms to known physical principles
It conforms to the composite structure proposed in the protons
It introduces the concept of a fundamental particle as the basis of all particles as required by our particle physicists
It conforms IN WHOLE AND IN PART to the requirement of our string theorists.

That's not a bad start.


Rosie
added...It conforms IN WHOLE AND IN PART to the requirement of our string theorists.

It's a stupid bunch of word salad, that's what it is. Go ahead, show us here just exactly how it "reconciles the mass size ratio of the proton to the electron". You cannot. You don't even understand how to derive quantities at all. You are dreaming.

You can't even _define_ the Casimir effect, and when you start talking about "our string theorists" I cannot even imagine the jumble of nonsense that you have inside your head. YOU CAN'T EVEN GET A SIMPLE STATEMENT ABOUT YOUR OWN CIRCUIT RIGHT. Over and over you misrepresent and misunderstand the simplest things people say to you. And you really expect people to believe that you understand the things you mention above. You are a real joke, Ainslie. Your "thesis" does none of the things you think it does, at all. You cannot use it to predict a single valid experimental result, for example. You cannot use it to explain HOW A CAPACITOR FUNCTIONS. You cannot use it to explain ANY of the phenomena I show in my videos concerning caps, mosfets and their relationship to your circuit. In short, your word salad "thesis" is not worth the pixels used to display it.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #4232 on: July 21, 2012, 07:53:02 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #4233 on: July 21, 2012, 07:56:00 AM »
Indeed - TK.  I was MOST anxious to prevent either you or FTC from stealing this as is your wont.  SADLY it didn't work.  You've attempted to appropriate this as your own work - and as expected.  And like FTC you're also trying to trivialise the numbers.  And sadly - there's nothing I can do to stop you short of those demonstrations.  Then you'll need to learn to sing to another tune.  Or you'll need to be very busy decrying the evidence in spite of that evidence.  Can't wait.  My apparatus will be back on MONDAY.  And then it's ready - set - go.  How nice is that?

Rosie Posie

ADDED
AND TODAY IS OUR WINTER EQUINOX.  THINGS CAN ONLY GET BETTER HERE IN THE SOUTHERN HEMISPHERE.  A NICE OMEN FOR US.  Not so good for you TK - picowatt - Sean - Mookie - The boss - and the rest.  I believe you're moving into a winter.  I trust it will only give you all a great deal of 'discontent'.

R



AND TODAY IS OUR WINTER EQUINOX.

Golly, Ainslie... on what planet do you live? THE EQUINOXES OCCUR IN MARCH AND SEPTEMBER, on Earth, you idiot. And the solstices in June and December.

And today is.... JULY 21. In other words, you once again talk about something that you know nothing of.


Now there will be post after post of Ainslie telling us that no matter what WIKI, or astronomers might say, THE WINTER EQUINOX IN SOUTH AFRICA is on July 21st.



Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #4234 on: July 21, 2012, 08:00:23 AM »
And I believe that in the middle of July in South Texas.... we are pretty durn far from "moving into winter".   

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #4234 on: July 21, 2012, 08:00:23 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #4235 on: July 21, 2012, 08:00:47 AM »

AND TODAY IS OUR WINTER EQUINOX.

Golly, Ainslie... on what planet do you live? THE EQUINOXES OCCUR IN MARCH AND SEPTEMBER, on Earth, you idiot. And the solstices in June and December.

And today is.... JULY 21. In other words, you once again talk about something that you know nothing of.


Now there will be post after post of Ainslie telling us that no matter what WIKI, or astronomers might say, THE WINTER EQUINOX IN SOUTH AFRICA is on July 21st.
Quite right.  I meant to say solstice.  Either way.  It's a GREAT BEGINNING TO THE SEASON FOR US. 

Regards little TK.  And let us know more about that GER.... thingy.  We need this to substantiate your definition of word salad. 

Rosie Pose

Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #4236 on: July 21, 2012, 08:03:49 AM »
And I believe that in the middle of July in South Texas.... we are pretty durn far from "moving into winter".
Quite right little TK.  As ever.  The use of the analogy was simply to imply that the looming 'winter of discontent' is more to do with the unfolding evidence that we'll be orchestrating.  Which leaves you where?  In the full flood of an enjoyable Texan sun.  It seems your 'GER' can't quite accommodate analogy.  You need to try and enlarge it.

Rosie Pose

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #4236 on: July 21, 2012, 08:03:49 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #4237 on: July 21, 2012, 08:06:03 AM »
Quote
Indeed - TK.  I was MOST anxious to prevent either you or FTC from stealing this as is your wont.  SADLY it didn't work.  You've attempted to appropriate this as your own work - and as expected.

That, you reprehensible and ignorant plagiarist and liar ... is a slanderous lie.

Your entire saga is peppered throughout with similar lies about what you did and about your collaborators. I, on the other hand always give credit where it is due. You seek to cover up and hide and denigrate the contributions and hard work of others, especially those... all of those.... who eventually find that they cannot agree with your bogus claims.

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #4238 on: July 21, 2012, 08:07:31 AM »
Quite right.  I meant to say solstice.  Either way.  It's a GREAT BEGINNING TO THE SEASON FOR US. 

Regards little TK.  And let us know more about that GER.... thingy.  We need this to substantiate your definition of word salad. 

Rosie Pose

Equinoxes.... March and September.
Solstices.... June and December.

Today... 21 July.

You... FAIL.


And your "GER" is again your own hallucination, as is your constant obsession with the size and texture of my pickle.

 We have been through this before you ignorant tipsy bloviator.
The GRADUATE RECORD EXAMINATION, or GRE, is a standardised set of tests administered several times yearly as ENTRANCE EXAMINATIONS FOR POST GRADUATE STUDY PROGRAMS, doctoral programs, Ainslie. It is one of the tests accepted by MENSA as qualifying exams for their membership. You can be assured that you would not do well on this set of tests.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graduate_Record_Examinations
http://www.petersons.com/graduate-schools/sample-gre-test-questions.aspx

And since you asked about  my pickle YET AGAIN... here you go.



Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #4238 on: July 21, 2012, 08:07:31 AM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #4239 on: July 21, 2012, 08:07:54 AM »
Actually there's more...

It reconciles the mass size ratio of the proton to the electron
It reconciles the Casimir effect
It reconciles the gravitational force
It answers to the requirement of missing matter measured by our astrophysicists
It conforms to the non-standard properties of the Higgs Boson
It reconciles all the forces
It conforms to known physical principles
It conforms to the composite structure proposed in the protons
It introduces the concept of a fundamental particle as the basis of all particles as required by our particle physicists
It conforms IN WHOLE AND IN PART to the requirement of our string theorists.
It conforms to Faraday's Lines of Force


Rosie

Offline Magluvin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5832
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #4240 on: July 21, 2012, 08:09:24 AM »
Yes it's hard to believe.  If you push 10 quarters in at one end then DOWN THAT LINE ten quarters need to be replaced - one, by one, by one.  No other way to complete that journey.  And that speed is NOT at light speed.  It is measurably SLOWER.  That's NOT my argument.  That's our EXPERTS.  And they really do know how to measure this. So.  If you choose to believe this - then, frankly, you're on your own.  But feel free.  No-one is prescribing beliefs.  It's just that belief has nothing to do with science.
YES INDEED.  We've measured it in both our COP>17 tests and in our NERD circuits.  And we've reconciled it with the mass size ratio of the proton to the electron.  We've argued it as a field - and we've used self-consistent arguments THROUGHOUT.

added
Here's the multiple proof...
It reconciles the mass size ratio of the proton to the electron
It reconciles the Casimir effect
It reconciles the gravitational force
It answers to the requirement of missing matter measured by our astrophysicists
It conforms to the non-standard properties of the Higgs Boson
It reconciles all the forces
It conforms to known physical principles
It conforms the composite structure proposed in the protons
It introduces the concept of a fundamental particle as the basis of all particles.

That's not a bad start.


Rosie

The tube from me to you is full of quarters, full. I push 10 extra quarters in my end and 10 quarters will fall out your end. But you dont have the actual quarters that I pushed into my end. You have the 10 quarters that were sitting in your end of the tube, because the tube is full.

So our cable from NY to Cali is full of copper. Electrons are more free to break their bonds in conductive materials.   A capacitors plates can be pumped with more electrons than the metal plate normally has at neutral charge, and the plate can be depleted of electrons, less than the metal plates normal holdings.

That cable from NY to Cali, I could pump extra electrons in the cable, even though the Cali end of the cable is disconnected. Not connected to anything. Now the cable has a static negative charge. After I pump the charge in at the NY end and disconnect, then the people at the Cali end can hook up and use that charge, whenever they decide to do so. However large the charge is, what ever I am able to put in, that is what will be available to the end user in Cali. Even if its just a pip, or a static zap.

When I pump the electrons in at the NY end, and the Cali end is not connected yet, we are cramming more electrons into the copper cable than it normally would have at neutral charge. This creates tension, pressure. These electrons dont like room mates, they like to live alone. They will take any hole they can jump to to get away from a room mate electron. If we introduce 500 extra electrons, we are forcing room mate ism. The 500 move in to other electrons apartments and then some of the original apartment dwellers move on to live with someone else, and so on and so on till those 500 extra electrons have created so much change in the cable, that there are 500 room mated apartments somewhere along that cable, spread out relatively evenly from one end of the cable to the other. This still creates tension and pressure, untill there is a release by making a connection at either end.

You do believe in static charge dont you Rose? Do you believe we can pump extra electrons into the open ended cable, as a static charge? And do you believe that we can extract that static charge from the cable at a later time? Like rubbing shoes on carpet and later discharging with the touch of a finger to a metal desk or pipe.

So if I pump those 500 electrons into the cable as a static charge, where are my 500 electrons exactly? Are they near the input end of the cable, or at the Cali end of the cable? ;)

Have you ever seen an Avramenko Plug circuit?  It pumps one side of a capacitor at a time. Pumpin in 1 plate, then pumping out of the other in opposing cycles of AC.
Input is 1 wire from a secondary of a transformer, and we can charge a cap, 1 wire in.

Ive done it. I use 1 wire from a secondary of a tiny 1kv neon transformer, into a 2 diode AV plug and charge a cap, vi 1 wire, HV ac, 1 side of the cap at a time, depending on the neg or pos cycle of the AC.


MaGs

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #4240 on: July 21, 2012, 08:09:24 AM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #4241 on: July 21, 2012, 08:12:51 AM »
The tube from me to you is full of quarters, full. I push 10 extra quarters in my end and 10 quarters will fall out your end. But you dont have the actual quarters that I pushed into my end. You have the 10 quarters that were sitting in your end of the tube, because the tube is full.

So our cable from NY to Cali is full of copper. Electrons are more free to break their bonds in conductive materials.   A capacitors plates can be pumped with more electrons than the metal plate normally has at neutral charge, and the plate can be depleted of electrons, less than the metal plates normal holdings.

That cable from NY to Cali, I could pump extra electrons in the cable, even though the Cali end of the cable is disconnected. Not connected to anything. Now the cable has a static negative charge. After I pump the charge in at the NY end and disconnect, then the people at the Cali end can hook up and use that charge, whenever they decide to do so. However large the charge is, what ever I am able to put in, that is what will be available to the end user in Cali. Even if its just a pip, or a static zap.

When I pump the electrons in at the NY end, and the Cali end is not connected yet, we are cramming more electrons into the copper cable than it normally would have at neutral charge. This creates tension, pressure. These electrons dont like room mates, they like to live alone. They will take any hole they can jump to to get away from a room mate electron. If we introduce 500 extra electrons, we are forcing room mate ism. The 500 move in to other electrons apartments and then some of the original apartment dwellers move on to live with someone else, and so on and so on till those 500 extra electrons have created so much change in the cable, that there are 500 room mated apartments somewhere along that cable, spread out relatively evenly from one end of the cable to the other. This still creates tension and pressure, untill there is a release by making a connection at either end.

You do believe in static charge dont you Rose? Do you believe we can pump extra electrons into the open ended cable, as a static charge? And do you believe that we can extract that static charge from the cable at a later time? Like rubbing shoes on carpet and later discharging with the touch of a finger to a metal desk or pipe.

So if I pump those 500 electrons into the cable as a static charge, where are my 500 electrons exactly? Are they near the input end of the cable, or at the Cali end of the cable? ;)

Have you ever seen an Avramenko Plug circuit?  It pumps one side of a capacitor at a time. Pumpin in 1 plate, then pumping out of the other in opposing cycles of AC.
Input is 1 wire from a secondary of a transformer, and we can charge a cap, 1 wire in.

Ive done it. I use 1 wire from a secondary of a tiny 1kv neon transformer, into a 2 diode AV plug and charge a cap, vi 1 wire, HV ac, 1 side of the cap at a time, depending on the neg or pos cycle of the AC.


MaGs
Mags you'll need to argue this with our academics.  If you're onto something then I'm sure they'll be delighted.  They're all looking for an explanation. 

Rosie

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #4242 on: July 21, 2012, 08:16:04 AM »
Actually there's more...

It reconciles the mass size ratio of the proton to the electron
It reconciles the Casimir effect
It reconciles the gravitational force
It answers to the requirement of missing matter measured by our astrophysicists
It conforms to the non-standard properties of the Higgs Boson
It reconciles all the forces
It conforms to known physical principles
It conforms to the composite structure proposed in the protons
It introduces the concept of a fundamental particle as the basis of all particles as required by our particle physicists
It conforms IN WHOLE AND IN PART to the requirement of our string theorists.
It conforms to Faraday's Lines of Force


Rosie

NOT actually,  Ainslie. Your "thesis" does none of these things. NONE.

IN fact... it cannot even "reconcile" or explain the simple phenomena that I  illustrate in my videos. Think of how nice it would feel and how you could crow... if only you could explain the VDG oil jet video...or even the simple operation of a Van De Graaff machine using your silly "thesis". But you cannot. On the other hand using QED one can precisely predict and successfully measure VDG voltages and currents based on materials used and belt speeds and size of capacity.

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #4243 on: July 21, 2012, 08:26:55 AM »

Offline Magluvin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5832
Re: Testing the TK Tar Baby
« Reply #4244 on: July 21, 2012, 08:40:54 AM »
Yeah, Mags... .they are all looking for an explanation.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cj5T0zRALKc

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KLkgGkEzk0c

Yeah, he invented that in 1929. Did they burn all the old books in colleges?

MaGs

 

OneLink