Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy  (Read 3501036 times)

Enjoykin

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 269
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #1665 on: April 22, 2015, 02:16:08 AM »
Nikolaev Gennadiy Vasilevich Lifework - The Electrodynamics of Physical Vacuum !!  :D

Everything is in these 4 equations !!
.........................................................

Definition of magnetic fileds according to Gennadiy Vasilevich Nikolaev:

1. Vector Magnetic Filed H = rot A
2. Scalar Magnetic Filed H* = -div A

Around any moving charging particle exist Complex Magnetic Field Hк in this form:

Hк = (H*, H); where H* is /2/ and H is /1/

А is Vector Magnetic Potential ; A has dimensionality of potential in SI system (Wb/m2)
and can be expressed in evident manner in next equation for moving charge {e} with speed {V}

A = eV / RC

R is radius from observation point to moving charge - electron.
V =  speed of moving charge - vector.
C=  speed of light

Scalar Magnetic Filed H* show divergence of Vector Magnetic Potential or in other words - Scalar Magnetic Filed H* is a spatial derivative of partial derivatives of A. It means Scalar Magnetic Filed H* can not be POTENTIAL and have dimensionality of Magnetic Field.

Energy density of Complex Magnetic Filed {Hк = [H* , H]} around moving charge is a square modulus of full field or in quaternion calculation it is simple sum of squares his two componnents - scalar {H*} and  vector {H} component. So to calculate full energy of Complex Magnetic Filed we need to calculate integral of volume around moving charge.

In total account we get remarkable result which has discovered Nikolaev Gennadiy Vasilevich is his theory.

Kinetic energy of moving electron in exactness is equal energy of his complex magnetic filed Hк.
W = (mV2)/2

in other words energy used in acceleration of electron expend for creation of complex magnetic filed Hк with two components - {Scalar H*} and {Vector H} around him.

Thanks to  Great physicist Gennadiy Vasilevich Nikolaev we now know for existence of Complex Magnetic Field and his both component - Scalar H* and Vector H.

What we need is Scalar H*because his property give us Overunity and Free Energy. So moto can be "RISE THE SCALAR WINDS" or "RIDE THE SCALAR WINDS".  Ok we need experiments - experiments and lot of experiments like Great Nikola Tesla said.  :D


EMJunkie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3322
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #1666 on: April 22, 2015, 03:46:12 AM »
Enjoykin nice material. Thanks!

MileHigh

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7600
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #1667 on: April 22, 2015, 03:59:57 AM »
Chris:

TK can spin circles around you.  Literally, within you making perhaps 10 or 15 posts in our discussion here a few months ago, I realized what bad shape you were in with respect to electronics.  You dropped a good half-dozen bombs that made it very clear where you were coming from.  When I gave you the single-component quiz, I knew beforehand that you didn't stand a chance of answering it.

What you basically learned is that you can spend five years on a bench and deceive yourself into believing that you understand electronics.  Have you done anything to correct that?

MarkE is about as far away from me as I am away from you.  In other words, if I try to discuss hard-core electronics with MarkE, it's like you trying to solve the single-component circuit with me.

So your derogatory comment to MarkE in a previous posting was seriously misdirected.

I will just repeat, if you are truly interested in this stuff then do the work required to get up the learning curve.  Your "partnered output coils" is just nonsensical foolishness.

MileHigh

EMJunkie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3322
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #1668 on: April 22, 2015, 04:12:06 AM »
Chris:

TK can spin circles around you.  Literally, within you making perhaps 10 or 15 posts in our discussion here a few months ago, I realized what bad shape you were in with respect to electronics.  You dropped a good half-dozen bombs that made it very clear where you were coming from.  When I gave you the single-component quiz, I knew beforehand that you didn't stand a chance of answering it.

What you basically learned is that you can spend five years on a bench and deceive yourself into believing that you understand electronics.  Have you done anything to correct that?

MarkE is about as far away from me as I am away from you.  In other words, if I try to discuss hard-core electronics with MarkE, it's like you trying to solve the single-component circuit with me.

So your derogatory comment to MarkE in a previous posting was seriously misdirected.

I will just repeat, if you are truly interested in this stuff then do the work required to get up the learning curve.  Your "partnered output coils" is just nonsensical foolishness.

MileHigh

MileHigh - Electronics is not my strong point, I said this right from day one, but again, you like others did not pay attention.

Magnetic's is my strong point and it is Magnetic's that needs to be the strong point for anyone that wishes to grasp Free Energy.

And, MileHigh, this is where I clearly run circles around You, MarkE, Bill and TK. Just look at MarkE's last comments about Induction, utter piffle! You guys might be Knowledgeable in the Electronics Field, but time after time you have demonstrated total lack of simple concepts in Magnetic's which is the most Important of All!!!

So, at the end of the day, You, commenting about this, on a forum called Overunity.com is nothing but more piffle.

There is not an Electronics Circuit out there that will ever produce Free Energy unless it uses the concepts I have given you! Period!!!

So am I worried about a few guys knowing more than me about a field that really is only a very small part of the entire equation? No, I am not.

Still, it is true that Steve Wonder can see more than you blokes!


MileHigh

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7600
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #1669 on: April 22, 2015, 04:19:39 AM »
Well, the thing is if you know about electronics then by definition you should have a pretty good grasp of magnetics.  They tend to go hand in hand.

Self-deception is a problem in all areas I suppose.  There are people that play with neo magnets all the time.  If a typical YouTube magnet guy holds a neo magnet in his hand and I say to him, "So how big do you estimate the magnetic bubble is?" without saying anything else.... Chances are he won't make the connection and won't have a clue what I am talking about.  (I wonder if Kenny would.)

When you have a new discovery or proposition I would be pleased to have a look at it.

EMJunkie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3322
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #1670 on: April 22, 2015, 04:21:19 AM »
Well, the thing is if you know about electronics then by definition you should have a pretty good grasp of magnetics.  They tend to go hand in hand.

Self-deception is a problem in all areas I suppose.  There are people that play with neo magnets all the time.  If a typical YouTube magnet guy holds a neo magnet in his hand and I say to him, "So how big do you estimate the magnetic bubble is?" without saying anything else.... Chances are he won't make the connection and won't have a clue what I am talking about.

When you have a new discovery or proposition I would be pleased to have a look at it.


Hahahaha - But obviously with you blokes, they don't!!

P.S: its not a New Discovery! Its even my Discovery! Maybe you could say I re-discovered this, but many hundreds of Inventors before me Discovered this Technology!



Enjoykin

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 269
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #1671 on: April 22, 2015, 04:22:59 AM »
Thanks EMJunkie !!

.....................................

I have forgot to say - the prime formula for scalar magnetic field H* = - divA  is valid only for the charges moving PARALLEL TO test charge (trial charge).

If the charge moves PERPENDICULAR TO test charge (trial charge), scalar magnetic field H* for it is calculated by next formula

H* = divA. 

Because in this case is different physics of interaction.

We should take in consideration these prime rules so if we want to calculete scalar magnetic field H* at given point of current contour, we need calculation separately for current elements PERPENDICULAR and PARALEL to test charge (trial charge) which is in a definition point.
Then generally speaking - the result will not be zero. With such amendment for scalar magnetic field H* the principle of superposition of fields worth, as well as for vector magnetic field H.

What is most important for us is a formula of longitudinal magnetic force (caused by scalar magnetic field H*)

F = H* I

H * = - divA  is scalar magnetic field (scalar value)
I  is current in the conductor (vector size).
A is vector potential of a magnetic field. 

Constant of proportionality in a formula I was lowered for simplicity.

Reg.
Enjoykin  :D

TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13958
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #1672 on: April 22, 2015, 05:25:27 AM »
TK, you really think Eric Dollard or Aaron Murakami have anything substantial?
No, and neither does (did) Floyd Sweet.
Quote

Absolutely you have!
No, I have not. Do you not remember back in this thread? Go read back a few weeks or months and see who built what, and how, and who answered what questions, and who demonstrated your improper use of your oscilloscope, and who got what output from what systems.
Quote

I am not perfect, never did claim to be. But, I have been able to move to territory that you TK have not been able to move into. Are you happy with measuring a Lossy system all the time? The New Oscilloscope, will be put to good use if you ever get it, for measuring nothing but a Lossy System. Because that is all you can accept, its all you expect. Its like giving an Oscilloscope to Steve Wonder!!!
Not hardly. You "are not perfect" but you are so egotistical that you claim to be the Saviour of Mankind with your nonsense theory about how coils behave. And you cannot show anything that is _not_ a lossy system yourself. And ... do you still think "AC coupling" is for measuring AC on your oscilloscope? Nobody in this thread is as blind as you have been when it comes to scope usage and measurements. Combining current and voltage from two different circuit branches for an output power "measurement"? I laugh at you, and if Stevie Wonder were an electrical engineer, so would he laugh at you.
Quote


The line I was waiting for from you. Your "ZERO" actually describes your understanding. What you expect is what you see, not what is really there! I have 3 really good video's I have shown for many years that show your Total NON-Sense to be words of a person that simply cannot know any better. You can not learn, or understand, grasp, or even connive reality if you have ruled it out and denied it!

I have already shown you that there is NOT "ZERO" on the output, "ZERO" only refers to the Effects of Lenz's Law. But I already know that you can not see basic principals that clearly are being replicated globally by many people.
There's nothing unusual or significant in your videos, other than your demonstration of your ignorance of your chosen topic. Your "nonzero" output is a result of your "partner coils" being connected in Aiding rather than Bucking configuration, and sometimes also due to their unbalanced inductances. In short, you are misrepresenting and misinterpreting your own empirical results, due to your agenda and your lousy measurements.
Quote

But; You are right about one thing, if an individual does not Listen, Pay Attention, Understand and Read the Information Given, If one cannot follow BASIC Circuits and Instructions, then that Individual does get exactly: "ZERO"

Which, is Exactly WRONG!!!

   Chris

Let's go back and review again, shall we? How many different documents, explanations and so on were given to you about the use of AC coupling on your oscilloscope, that you simply ignored because you _thought_ you knew what it was for..... but you were utterly wrong.  Don't forget that I constructed coils and circuits according to your directions and had results that even surprised YOU in your pitiful lack of knowledge. And don't forget that YOU NEVER PROVIDED MEASUREMENTS to support your claims of OU or in fact of _anything_ unusual happening in your circuits. Can't follow your own directions? You are Exactly WRONG!!

TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13958
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #1673 on: April 22, 2015, 05:26:35 AM »
@Enjoykin:

Who do you think was the first person to mention Gennady Nikolayev on this forum... years ago before his books were available in English? I'll give you one guess.



EMJunkie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3322
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #1674 on: April 22, 2015, 05:50:14 AM »
Exactly WRONG!!

Which TK, is around 25 more globes than you lit with your amazing: Extreme High Voltage: TinseKoil 8 Information Slideshow (corrected)

Also, if your cheap enamel wire could have handled more Voltage then the insulation would not have burnt off. Which means, that and its clearly visible when viewing the video, that many more Neon's could have gone on there!!!

With less Input Power!!!

Of all people here, you were the one that I had hoped could see the light. It seems that Eyes are still only a sensory perception that is very much Censored by Perceptions!
« Last Edit: April 22, 2015, 09:24:14 AM by EMJunkie »

EMJunkie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3322
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #1675 on: April 22, 2015, 05:56:38 AM »
@Enjoykin:

Who do you think was the first person to mention Gennady Nikolayev on this forum... years ago before his books were available in English? I'll give you one guess.

Hahahaha - Its because you're AMAZING TK!!!

MileHigh

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7600
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #1676 on: April 22, 2015, 06:18:54 AM »
That was a big one - if you don't know how to use your scope coupling after five years..... Tienes muchas problemas.

You need to work on your "nerd street cred."

EMJunkie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3322
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #1677 on: April 22, 2015, 06:31:28 AM »
That was a big one - if you don't know how to use your scope coupling after five years..... Tienes muchas problemas.

You need to work on your "nerd street cred."

MileHigh - Тролли и Злодеи


EMJunkie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3322
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #1678 on: April 22, 2015, 06:32:39 AM »
You have "given" exactly nothing, besides lots of misdirection, fake theory interpretations and unsupported claims of unusual performance... which you refuse to substantiate--- because you _cannot_ substantiate your claims with data from properly performed measurements. You have gone "dark" out of embarrassment due to your display of your own ignorance about the use of your own equipment and your inability to provide data which incontrovertibly supports your claims. But apparently your Top Secret Open Source group isn't providing you with what you need to gratify your ego, so here you are again with your insults, misdirections, irrelevancies, paranoia and more false claims.

To All,

I repeat, because it is important:

It is so simple:

*************************************************************************************************************************


Induction = dPhi/dt
Lenz Law = -dPhi/dt


What does 2 x -dPhi/dt equal?

Not (-) anything does it!!!  ;)

WhaLa - Like Magic - Lenz's Law is gone.

*************************************************************************************************************************


Again Floyd Sweet: (Think Superposition)

Quote

If the directions of the two signals are such that opposite H-fields cancel and E-fields add, an apparently steady E-field will be created. The energy density of the fields
remain as calculated above, but the value of the E-field will double from E/2 to E.


So, the question begs, is NOTHING really something? Of course it is. Nothing = Magnetic Field ((-) Lenz Law x 2) = 1 or E/2 changes to E.

Simplified: 2 x -1 = 1

Why 2? Because there needs to be 2 output Coils, or  "Partnered Output Coils"!!!

Once you are able to think clearly about this, see the Light, you will! You will see how basic this is!

So, have I given anything, Yes I have, can you see it, no you cant, can you conceptualise it, no, not yet, will you be able to? This is up to you!

P.S: My initial Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iJsVSMQqCOM

MarkE

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6830
Re: Partnered Output Coils - Free Energy
« Reply #1679 on: April 22, 2015, 07:03:31 AM »
@Mark E

I wasn't actually attacking science nor do I expressly disagree with it as you seem to be implying... I do however have issue with others interpretation of it. I would also agree many have made invalid claims and many might continue to do so however this in no way implies this will always be the case.


Did you read and understand the exponential growth of knowledge?. As we speak knowledge is effectively doubling on an annual basis however according to the graph curve very soon it will double every six months. Now what do you believe this means Mark?, to me it means we will gain new knowledge leading to new understanding and we should be clear we are not speaking of what is known at present but new knowledge. At which point we might ask the question, if this is really new knowledge then can it co-exist with what we consider old knowledge?.
Growth does not imply recission.  The very reason that we have accelerated our learning is the strength of the foundational knowledge that we have developed.
Quote


You are trying to argue that nothing can change and yet everyone here knows intuitively that it must and in fact it will with or without our consent. The fact remains that everything is changing in one way or another and to presume the future must be dictated by the past is a misguided venture in my opinion. We will learn, we will understand and we will move forward... that's the way it is Mark.
Kindly spare me straw man arguments.  I said and argued no such thing.
Quote


I find the contrast in perspectives fascinating, you are trying to argue Faraday and lenz Law are irrefutable to a person who saw a craft accelerate to astronomical speeds in seconds and leave Earth's obit. As such I have seen the future first hand and I'm not so sure it has room for people stuck in the past. The future is coming and it is simply a matter of time.
I argue for what verifiable facts show.  Where do you have verifiable facts that defy either Faraday or Lenz?  That's quite a trick seeing anything that isn't huge leave earths orbit.  Please tell me how you think that you managed to do that?
Quote


AC