ТРÐÐСФОРМÐТОР2012
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rS0ekEsIuJA&feature=em-uploademailInteresting :
COP=50% over 100Some facts:at start of video current 0 A at input. and 2 W outthan increase of the load gives him 50% less consumption from the grid comparing to output load.At the 21:39 minute: he proposes
schematic of power station that does not need any power supply at all.
Yes in initial impulse is required.
The data from that Russian video is only visual assumption.There is lack of empirical data based on true measurement analysis
yet strong enough to really pay attention to this concept
playing with magnetic part of electromagnetic field does NOT need core made of metal nor ferrite.
Well sound strange?
At first where is the energy stored in capacitor?
The answer is:
The energy is stored in dielectric.
1.You take plates of capacitor and glass container ( glass cup)
the plates in this example look like inner cylinder and outer cylinder
2.You charge capacitor
3. You remove plates with non insulated long nose pliers, leaving glass container empty
3a.You touch dielectric with your hands !!!!
4. than you take the two plates into your hands and short them out
6. Move or do not move dielectric to another location ( say 10 cm forward) .You touch dielectric with your hands !!!!
7. put plates back to its original place
8. short the plates
9. spark will indicate about 90-99% of original charge.
[size=1.8333em]
MIT Physics Demo -- Dissectible Capacitor
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ckpQW9sdUg There are two ways to charge capacitor
1. by displacement
2. by external charge
ad1 Displacement when you change the volume between the plates
that includes volume of nothing in perfect vacuum
The effect is the same.
ad2
external charge = energy from any power source.
conclusion:
- when you remove plates as described above than by removing you create displacement that is origination of additional charge.
- when you short plates than you discharging only part of charge that comes from displacement but the one that happened because of you bringing plates one next to the other.
But if you have been holding plates in your hands than there is presumably no potential discharge ( resistance of the hands)
So what this has to do with video from above?
Well in capacitor we have presence of magnetic flux at 90 degrees to electrical line of charge
got the picture?
?
General conclusion:
If than dielectric is the storage of charge than vacuum as dielectric is storage of charge...
sounds strange?
??
If you can change position of dielectric after was charged with no plates on it from point A to point B
and than apply plates or new set of plates and discharge it than
than interesting is if you take in space part of vacuum and partition it with metal plates
The whole structure than is put in motion at vector V and speed delta T
But after charge you remove plates and try to apply that plates to that part of vacuum at 1 million miles away from that point . Yes it would be new set of plates.
So what.
Train of charged space once charged.
That is what falsification of Mendeleev periodic table was for....
first row of his table belongs to Ether that is expressed in NUTONII
WESLEY
train of energy.. Ps Reading what is above:I
was not as radical to that point ever in my life.I do not make any statements.But what if.... what if.... some of this is taking place.Second subject:
I try to keep to basis of physics but physic can lie as well.
Yesterday I was discussing subject of dust-ification of towers at 9/11
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZWjktDuIhR8 brought to court by Dr Judy Wood
She pointed at patent of Piggott as origination to John Hutchinson transmutation and anti-gravity
Than she was comparing Hutchinson effect to 9/11
http://www.freepatentsonline.com/pdfb/documents/uspt/patent_pdf/1006/US1006786/pdf/US1006786.pdf[/font]
It was very disappointing that 3 major brains within that small scientific community without analyzing any data of Dr Judy Wood have been supporting official version of 9/11
I supported my questions based on historical data
1911 patent for Piggott was issued but only after 10 years of waiting... filing day 1901 and that is because of
JP Morgan and/or his power( Chase bank) activity to stop that from happening.( the same man who finished progress of Nicola Tesla
In 70s [size=78%] [/size]
Eric Dollard Peter Lindemann Tesla's Longitudinal Electricity
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=endscreen&NR=1&v=Y4m82cvThd8[/color]
later DR Lidemann show video about longitudinal waves standing that 1000V per square mm creates environment for power transmitting at DC
kind of tunnel for one to imagine.....
Piggott patent contains transmitter that due to pressurization air is increasing dielectric constant of the air so that level could be achieved.
In 1980's John Hutchison experimented with anti-gravity and transmutation that has basic principals taken from Piggott patent. She also says that she witnessed demonstration of transmutation effect.
Based on available statements:
In roughly 1983 John had visitors from Pentagon for period of 4 months.
In 1989 Forth Mammoth in NJ US Army[size=78%]
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0022369771900369was very much advanced in transmutation effects than document was declasified in may 2004 that means long after 9/11 when there was no fear od conclusion any longer.. .............. dead wrong...................
also another patent below is related to transmutation
[size=78%]
http://www.rexresearch.com/meyernmr/meyer.htm[/size]
Was that that army was just starting with transmutation only after John Hutchison experiment?
Was that than only perceptive similarity between dustification of vertical beams of towers and destructive pattern
of that event to the one pointed by Dr Judy Wood in John experiments?
I do not expect from anyone to agree with me. But I expect fair data and fair discussion based on scientific facts and hypothesis.
There was none...........
What they are afraid of?
??
Or they just show their true faces............
F.....................................k that ugly world of servants of the big brother..
http://www.freepatentsonline.com/pdfb/documents/uspt/patent_pdf/1006/US1006786/pdf/US1006786.pdf how about if
TK was using similar arrangement's but using different material to redirect magnetic flux?
