And interested in replicating your OU device. Well I tried to replicate it.

Congratulations on you attempt to replicate the promising Yoke STAAAR device.
This is the most unusual device in this thread, if the evidence presented about it was bona fide.

Where do you take your tuning instructions from?

I in fact, connected oscilloscope in series with a 60W Bulb at the two ends of bifilar winding.

The light bulb should be connected in parallel because any load on the bifilar winding affects the frequencies of the device.

The oscilloscope showed me sinus but it was similar to AM signal . In which the carrier was 2.55MHz and enveloping was done by 51.5 Khz.

AM signal is the result of two waveforms multiplication. What the STAAAR team showed on their scopeshots was waveform addition (the HF waveform riding on top of the LF waveform)

* Please help me and tell me is there any thing wrong in my procedure. Am I making some mistake in no of windings or connection method. My toroid yoke is 90% similar to yours.

Yes, Wesley's tuning procedure is imprecise and ambiguous.  I attempted to clarify it with him for the benefit of everyone trying to replicate the Yoke device, but Wesley did not care about clarifying it.

Also, please note that even if the conical core has similar dimensions the molecular arrangement, composition and permeability of the core can be very different.  You can compare the latter by comparing the inductance your windings with Osiakosia's results who measured windings on exactly the same core as the STAAAR team's. 
I am puzzled why the STAAAR team did not perform these crucial permeability/inductance measurements themselves.

* What I have to do now? and where I have to apply 50 Hz 9V AC ? Is  that to be applied when Gen 1 and Gen 2 or also connected and powered on at 15 T and 50 T windings?

The instructions where to connect the ~50Hz signal are listed here: Reply #9510
Please do not ignore the safety instructions. If you ignore them you may damage your signal generators.

* Is the number of turns on bifilar ok? coz I am confused that in your schematic at lithanian site you have shown 21T each in bifilar (so these make total of 42 turns) but in some forums I have seen u talking about 100 or 105 Turns ? Please clear me and guide me as I am very much serious in making this device to run.

Apparently the number of turns in the bifilar winding is not critical.

* I cannot give more than + / - 3.5 V  as it is the limitation of hardware.

If you need more current and voltage out of your signal generators you may use the attached Half Bridge circuit to amplify rectangular waveforms.  This circuit will also protect your signal generators from damage.

  I congratulate  NEW 2012 .....

- I connected the coil via a 100 Ohm resistor to my Wavetek function generator
- I set up the generator to deliver a 1Vpp sweeping frequency from 500KHz to 3.6MHz
- I connected the scope to caduceus having an initial tank cap of 500pf
what obtained and freezed on my storage scope is the trumpet wave.

This would suggest that the envelope of the oscillations is a result of the frequency sweep.
Concretely a frequency dependent impedance of the LC circuit.

Apparently, you are measuring voltage oscillations and are optimizing the device for the maximum voltage.
Did you consider optimizing for the maximum In/Out power ratio?

Where are your voltage nodes and antinodes of the standing wave on your long thick coil ?

It is also interesting to note that in the same condition I moved the scope to monitor the output coil and there I found one main resonance at 3.6MHz and a second resonance (about halph amplitude) at 4.5MHz: that's not expected. First resonance is lower than caduceus resonace probably due to additional losses on the output coil & load components.

It is possible that you are dealing with 2 different resonance frequencies.
1) A lumped LC resonance at the frequency equal to 1/(LC)^0.5
2) A reflected wave resonance (standing wave) inversely proportional to the length of the coil. See: http://www.overunity.com/10517/standing-wave-coil-frequency/

@verpies,

This would suggest that the envelope of the oscillations is a result of the frequency sweep.
Concretely a frequency dependent impedance of the LC circuit.
Apparently, you are measuring voltage oscillations and are optimizing the device for the maximum voltage.
Did you consider optimizing for the maximum In/Out power ratio?

Exactly.
It is impossible with the trumpet test setup to have anything to be seen on the output: no way to optimize in that way.
Just for doing the I/O output optimization I re-enabled my low power HV pulser and tried in every way to optimize the output. Please consider that after the second SG (SG-2) and in parallel with the lamp I see only 1.5KV very thin positive pulses (<0.5usec pulse width) with a repetition rate of 100Hz - 2KHz depending on SG 1 in use, SG 1 tank cap, Caduceus tank cap, SG 2 in use and SG 2 tank cap...so you see many variables. These thin positive pulses due to the low duty cycle are not able to light the lamp. Of course before SG 2 it is possible to see very well that the voltage on the cap rise until 600-800V in one step or in a staircase like...until the SG 2 fires., then the cycle restart with the upmentioned repetition rate.
Roberto

Thank you for all your efforts.   I am posting these links just as food for thought and though they are off topic they also have merit:

Howard Johnson final communication to the world concerning his findings,  DISCOVERING QUANTUM MECHANICAL MOLECULAR ENERGY .

The Disclosure Conference showing many creditable peoples testimonies about suppressed technologies,  The Disclosure Project


Thank you Wattsup for the link on those HV components,  what a great source it is.   

Happy New Year my brothers and sisters and may God bless us everyone. 

One thing is certain and a bright spot:  Everyday that passes is a day closer to learning to use free energy if we don't quit.

Of course, the trumpet shape you showed was not the one we desire.

I got lost.
What is the evidence that the SAAAR Team's trumpet envelope is caused by something else then in Roberto's case?
Refresh my memory please.

@ronotte

Thanks for your explanation. So I will have to do all the variables as well.

Regarding your set-up, what are you using for C3 which in the diagram prescribes the use a variable capacitor?

@verpies

Just looked at your last post. I am still waiting for parts to make that last circuit. I am curious if you know of anything available that is just ready made that I could buy and use. Something reliable and robust and high enough freq range.

The TPS2833D that is received (I ordered 10 of them) from DigiKey are so small, about 1/4" by 1/8" that I don't even know if I can actually solder those small legs.
http://search.digikey.com/ca/en/products/TPS2833D/296-2393-5-ND/306266

I instinctively then ordered from Futurlec the following 8PINSOIC adapter so I could solder the TPS2833D to this small board so I can have half a chance in working with it.
http://www.futurlec.com/SMD_Adapters.shtml

But now that I have the TPS2833 in my hand, or finger tips, and am waiting to receive the adapters, I am scared to try and solder this because I know I will screw it up mainly by either overheating these things. And even worst, I am very skeptical that this little do-dad will last more then a minute on such a board. How the hell can this little itty bitty part do both receive the pulse from my FG and then action the driver to pulse the feed supply to primary. I never worked with things so small so please understand my apprehensions may be wrong.

I once had a nice HP 214B that went up to 100vdc and 10MHz. It blew while I was pulsing a TPU mock-up. In one second, zap, it was gone and it is not repairable. The zap went in too deep. That baby was the best and the problem now with getting another one is that it is a noisy beast and big and unfortunately space is prime these days around my work area and office.

wattsup