Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

It suggests that there is no need for a security (differential) circuit breaker between the capacitors and the transformer box. A simple circuit breaker would have done it also (like that one connected below the two black power meters).

No problem here as this will protect against a fault condition caused by any one of the caps and it might just have been what he had available. The very fact that the caps can be manually switched in or out suggests that these capacitors are important. Have another think about how PF affects performance and how they can affect power meters 

What do you think a simple circuit breaker hidden in TK's tin can could possibly be important for in terms of device performance? I think you are now clutching at straws   

What do you think a simple circuit breaker hidden in TK's tin can could possibly be important for in terms of device performance?

There could be something inside this earth-leakage circuit-breaker (FI-Schutzschalter) that makes it easy (a simple method according to TK) to keep resonance (with whatsoever, maybe two coils).

Investigating ...

Hello Hoppy and Zeitmaschine,

You have both sparked a memory for me.... Back in the 80's during the construction of Electric mountain in North Wales the CEGB (central electricity generating board) were carrying out tests on the large earth mat that they had placed under the bottom lake. BTW this was a pump storage system. Our team was involved in looking at how effective the earthing was. The test was done by injecting 3KV @ 49 HZ into the mat and groups of engineers with earth rods and volmeters were sent off to different locations. 49 Hz was chosen so that we could see the the 1Hz Beat frequency. What amazed me was that metal objects in the viscinity were charged up to quite high voltage. But more to the point the in and outgoing cables to the local telephone exchange completely melted, it took more than two weeks to sort out!!

My point. What would be the outcome of having two matching transformers looking at each other one sitting at 50HZ and one at 49HZ? My own thinking it would be like trying to join 2 unsyncronized generators together. Massive circulating current. Could this be a way of creating energy by tapping into the beat?

Just a thought, Cheers Grum.

In my working days as a Telecom Design Engineer for British Rail, I worked on supervisory control systems that transmitted data from track side electric sub stations to control rooms over telecom cables.
During storms the overheads at the sub-stations would sometimes arc to ground and induce into the nearby non-earthed telecom cables. this potential weighting caused high currents to surge down the telecom cables to find an earthing point in the nearest telecom apparatus room with devastating effect! I was sitting in one of the control room apparatus rooms when the data receiving equipment caught fire. The estimated flash-over on the cable termination blocks was calculated to have been around 3KV! The data systems control equipment at that time were not isolated from the cables. Needless to say this soon changed after a few of these disasters!

excuse me can the someone to write the exactly what he says for the material indispensable for conducting of the experiment?, thanks in advance!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hYUa5U_cpH0, I read somewhere that in the alien military industrial complex "Dulce" using electricity for producing of water and maybe this is the principle

Hello x_name41.

Tis an April 1st GAG. All fools day But wasn't it good?

Cheers Grum.

excuse me can the someone to write the exactly what he says for the material indispensable for conducting of the experiment?, thanks in advance!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hYUa5U_cpH0, I read somewhere that in the alien military industrial complex "Dulce" using electricity for producing of water and maybe this is the principle

The video was published on 1 April 

Nice TC
 

aaaaa no no no no, then and the glowing of the lamp an April joke, prove your that the no so and then I'll believe!

Oh dear! 

No , I'm only relating and reporting "possible" presence of this particular factor now
(Blood suckers safety measure)

Those damned bloodsuckers!  I can't even have a straightforward conversation because of them.

The device does not live any trace of  activity after zeroed
No trace can you believe  it?

Yeah, I can believe it.  I have seen stimulated beta decay before.
Contemporary science acknowledges the stimulation of light emission but not the stimulation of beta decay.
 
Also, it is important to notice, that experiments do not detect free neutrons in beta decay.  They only detect electrons/positrons and deduce neutrinos/antineutrinos.  Free neutrons are synthesized only in reverse-beta reactions and are easily absorbed by Cadmium atoms (e.g.: in CdCl₂) with subsequent emission of a gamma ray. See the Cowan experiment.

Neutrinos/antineutrinos are only deduced since they are near impossible to detect directly. 
...and according to Miles Mathis those extra neutrinos are not really emitted in beta decay but they are the result of bad accounting:

Quote from: Miles Mathis, Source: http://milesmathis.com/quark.html

But we still must explain the neutron’s actual decay. Why does it decay into a proton and an electron, with a bit of energy left over? Well, study the composition of the neutron and proton: all you have to do is switch the z-spin to make one into the other. So the neutron does not decay at all.
No, it gets hit. It doesn’t emit the electron, it gets hit by a positron in a glancing blow, reversing the z-spin of the neutron. The collision also reverses the z-spin of the positron, turning it into an electron.

Beta decay has been misread. The detectors have failed to detect the incoming particle, and so they think it has been created. This may be because the outgoing electron follows the same path as the incoming positron, simply reversing direction. As the spin is reversed, so is the linear direction. This would "overwrite" the incoming track, making it invisible in any bubble, ionization, or other detection chamber.

It is like there was nothing  right  a second ago

When I wrote "ZERO" in my previous message I did not mean the Radiac meter indicating zero after the RF stimulation has ended a second ago.
I meant the Radiac meter indicating zero, DURING the correct RF stimulation while the beta-shield is covering the probe.

So what reading do you get with the beta-shield over the probe DURING the proper RF stimulation/activation?